City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

The shills are waiting for their official line form arsenal
Come on Rob draper, Miguel Delaney etc
Where’s you thoughts now???????
Oh I forgot you don’t have any, you just copy and paste what your told
 
mcfcphil said:
View attachment 146723

Premier League chief executive Richard Masters made clubs aware of the situation in an email this afternoon.

In it, he acknowledged that the ‘previous rules as a whole are void and unenforceable’ but attempted to play down the development.

‘The previous APT rules are no longer in place,’ he said, ‘and new rules were voted into force’.

‘The league has previously told clubs that this decision was about the legal status of previous APT rules and would not impact the operation of new rules.’

Masters added that the new rules remain in force and that clubs remain required to comply with them.
Click to expand...
But are the new rules legal Richard?
 
Eric Hitchmough said:
Nah it’ll motivate Alexander Isak to score tomorrow (if you listen to some of the crackpots on here)
Click to expand...
Yes I found all that angst about the Rodri flag a bit disappointing. Rodders loved his flag.

The bigger cases, 115/130, will have been decided by now and the panel will be writing up their judgment. Fingers crossed we will be cleared again.

I am bit a bit of an optimist and my main worry is that the Prem will go bust before they can compensate us.
 
Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
Extract from Samuel in his article having seen the report:

The most damning statement in this latest ruling is that the Premier League employed “sleight of hand” in its presentation of the rules after the initial judgment. There should be considerable disquiet among stakeholders about that, considerable disquiet about the tenure of the Premier League’s chief executive, Richard Masters, and its chairwoman, Alison Brittain. Are their positions even tenable now?

The **** has deliberately misled everyone. Total ****.


Link to archived version of Martin Samuel full Times article here:

Click to expand...

When both sides claimed victory after the initial ruling, legal experts advised to wait for the award of costs. With this clarification, it is plain that bill is likely to be handed largely to the Premier League, believed to total in excess of £20million. It is not passed directly to clubs as a £1million invoice but taken off revenue distribution figures. As these also go towards Profitability and Sustainability calculations, this is rather an unfortunate position. A governing body that scrutinises balance sheets and hands down punishments if the sums do not add up is actively costing clubs money. Masters must hope he has credit in the bank; although given his recent track record on litigation and shareholder clubs, how could he?
 
mcfcphil said:
View attachment 146723

Premier League chief executive Richard Masters made clubs aware of the situation in an email this afternoon.

In it, he acknowledged that the ‘previous rules as a whole are void and unenforceable’ but attempted to play down the development.

‘The previous APT rules are no longer in place,’ he said, ‘and new rules were voted into force’.

‘The league has previously told clubs that this decision was about the legal status of previous APT rules and would not impact the operation of new rules.’

Masters added that the new rules remain in force and that clubs remain required to comply with them.
Click to expand...
So they made amendments to illegal rules?

Sounds legit
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top