City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

SilverFox2 said:
I live in Spain so avocado's are popular on toast and salads.
They actually are recommended by professional nutritionists because of their ability to target dangerous organ and belly fat when on a calorie controlled diet despite being high in calories themselves.

The famous Mediterranean diet would not be the same without them.
Click to expand...
Avocado on a bacon sandwich is brilliant. The avocado absorbs the bacon flavour and turns into super healthy bacon.

What’s not to love?
 
Micky Blue said:
So,City challenge the PL on their illegal rules and were the ones ruining football.

www.telegraph.co.uk

Man City in danger of destroying Premier League as we know it

Club’s legal onslaught on financial rules could allow wealthiest clubs to spend without limits and kill off competition
www.telegraph.co.uk www.telegraph.co.uk
Click to expand...
Sam seems to changed his tune. Thought we lost.

www.telegraph.co.uk

Forget Manchester City’s ‘triumph’ the losses outweigh the wins in landmark ruling

Club may frame it as a ‘victory’ but key rule stopping owners using inflated sponsorship deals to disguise equity as revenue survives
www.telegraph.co.uk www.telegraph.co.uk
 
slbsn said:
i) I suspect there is a good chance that transitional provisions are not lawful - they fundamentally and deliberately treat shareholder loans differently. This appears to be the number 1 issue the PL has.
ii) I don't think so - that also seems pretty clear from the decisions

But I don't think there is certainty here which is why the PL need to negotiate with City and kill APT 2.

The end game either way is surely not adding £20-40m to Everton's PSR losses so they fail by a mile for this year and 25/26? Surely. Because that is the likely consequence of retroactive shareholder loan provisions without mitigation.
Click to expand...

Thanks for that.

Am I wrong that APT 2 won't even be considering the treatment of shareholder loans for FFP/PSR purposes? If anyone wants to challenge that, say Everton or Forest, or City for that matter, then they would have to start a new arbitration?

Then I will stop asking questions :)
 
halfcenturyup said:
Thanks for that.

Am I wrong that APT 2 won't even be considering the treatment of shareholder loans for FFP/PSR purposes? If anyone wants to challenge that, say Everton or Forest, or City for that matter, then they would have to start a new arbitration?

Then I will stop asking questions :)
Click to expand...
Yes that would be another case. I don't think that is likely
 
madloaf said:

"Man City in danger of destroying Premier League as we know it​

Club’s legal onslaught on financial rules could allow wealthiest clubs to spend without limits and kill off competition"

Or to call it it's proper name: The Premier League from 1992 to 2009.
Click to expand...

Well Chelsea have spent without limits when you look at 1.5b spent but it's all fine because it's an American spending that much oh let's sell stuff back go ourselves to not get points deductions!

Just say apt completely goes! Then if a club gets into Europe it has PSR you have to abide to! Also uefa has fair value on sponsors! So if you not in Europe and want to compete you can!
 
MeatnSpudsMCFC said:
Sam seems to changed his tune. Thought we lost.

www.telegraph.co.uk

Forget Manchester City’s ‘triumph’ the losses outweigh the wins in landmark ruling

Club may frame it as a ‘victory’ but key rule stopping owners using inflated sponsorship deals to disguise equity as revenue survives
www.telegraph.co.uk www.telegraph.co.uk
Click to expand...
Funny that, it’s almost like most journalists don’t know what they are talking about when it comes to legal analysis and should stick to pontificating about football.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Funny that, it’s almost like most journalists don’t know what they are talking about when it comes to legal analysis and should stick to pontificating about football.
Click to expand...
I don't consider them to be journalists. I think a more apt job title is 'online football salesman'.

Their primary objective is to bait clicks.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Funny that, it’s almost like most journalists don’t know what they are talking about when it comes to legal analysis and should stick to pontificating about football.
Click to expand...
I'd have more respect for him if he started a small paragraph stating that he was wrong before he wrote his piece. But nope, it's as if he never wrote it.
 
Micky Blue said:
So,City challenge the PL on their illegal rules and were the ones ruining football.

www.telegraph.co.uk

Man City in danger of destroying Premier League as we know it

Club’s legal onslaught on financial rules could allow wealthiest clubs to spend without limits and kill off competition
www.telegraph.co.uk www.telegraph.co.uk
Click to expand...
The irony of that headline, clearly Wallace didn't follow or was aware of football in the 80s, 90s and 00s, when certain clubs could spend what they wanted.
 
Coatigan said:
I would normally not even bother responding to this pish.

But, without being a condescending prick, mate, not only have you completely misunderstood what Stefan has claimed here, but you have concocted some warped reality bubble of it all. At the very least, you are on the wrong fucking thread!

If you can't follow very basic points made, I suggest you don't bother expanding the shit out of it as you have done, and then looking for odd motivation in it.

Look, not that I am or would need to 'defend' Stefan here, I myself have disagreed with his take and argued with him. Sometimes politely, sometimes tersely, sometimes sarcastically, depending on his tone, my mood, the general forum atmosphere at the time.

But I'm sorry, this level of layering that just doesn't exist there, based on things that have not actually been implied, never mind said, I feel needs called the nonsense it is.

Nonsense.

There.
Click to expand...
Well done for calling out the Bloviation. There are few better examples of the Dunning Kruger effect than this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top