He makes a fool of himself with virtually everything he writes. It seems clear that he is not in the loop with anyone at the club. He has missed the story.Sam seems to changed his tune. Thought we lost.
Forget Manchester City’s ‘triumph’ the losses outweigh the wins in landmark ruling
Club may frame it as a ‘victory’ but key rule stopping owners using inflated sponsorship deals to disguise equity as revenue surviveswww.telegraph.co.uk
A totally strange article that shows a total lack of understanding of how legal hearings work. As Martin Samuel says it is not a game of tennis where legal points made count towards the outcome. City won on the substantial point that the rules were unlawful. That supercedes all the debates.
Seeing as he was the Telegraph's football reporter based in Manchester in the early noughties, he knows full well what the rags were spending and was, no doubt, loving it.
Difficult to decide if he's the worst Client journalist shill ,or it's Herbert, Delaney,Cross x2,Wilson,Roney,Ducker,McConnell, Jackson, Curtis x2,Winter,Roan,Stone Cunningham,Slot,Sweeney or he's just a Rag ba*****!Sam seems to changed his tune. Thought we lost.
Forget Manchester City’s ‘triumph’ the losses outweigh the wins in landmark ruling
Club may frame it as a ‘victory’ but key rule stopping owners using inflated sponsorship deals to disguise equity as revenue survives
I liked this comment, then un-liked it, just so I could like it again.
So do you believe City are just being vindictive towards the PL or do you believe there is some other reason that neither you nor the rest of us have thought of for why the club are pursuing it?
It could also be (and in my view is likely to be) part of a wider strategic plan in relation to the governance of the game.
I think they are toying with the governance people and the CEO right now without necessarily having a specific point relating to the APT rules. And quite enjoying it
Edut: dont know what went wrong. I am referring to Sam Wallace, a so called reporter for the Racistgraph, aka Telegraph.
I also question your desire to bow, scrape, doth cap & touch forelock in respect to professional authority without question. It's weird & worrying.
An expensive game surely, even for us?
I am delighted with the strategy as long as they are fucking those (the governance people and the CEO) miserable cunts.
I’ve answered that a thousand times on this thread. Try reading, if you can. It is a simplistic suggestion you could dismiss with two seconds thought. Here’s a word you might understand: evidence. Also look up the Fraud squad’s proposed change of policy.
