It’s not a communication issue. Colin simply believes the case is much less serious for the reasons he’s set out. He’s entitled to that view. I disagree and have pointed out numerous times the indicators to support my view. But honestly I can’t be arsed going over it again and again.
But I think it is a good idea that his view is added to the Q&A which I think, he thought, was me taking the piss.
And btw if people still can’t see that even the lawyers involved in these cases aren’t sure of the right answer I can’t help you. Most of the time people go into hearings thinking they have the better of the arguments but one side loses. There are no certainties and not everything has an answer even less so when we are piecing it together without the key docs.