City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

Fucking hell!

When did this thread descend into petty madness?

Think people need a timeout.

It’s going to be crazy in here and 115 as the date looms closer.
 
Pile-on bullshit in this thread again. Usual attention whores too. Y'all shuold Ignore each other and then we dont all have to read this embarrasing shit.
We did have a half decent run this afternoon tbf, without any of that.
 
He already is. And I did request anyone with negative feedback to DM me yesterday. Strangely nobody has taken me up on the offer.

Just ignore the negativity - keep posting your thoughts & explanations please
 
We have an highly paid highly educated professional that once worked for the Club who is clearly a blue and is the chosen subject matter expert on national radio
Yet people abuse the guy - madness
If and when Stephan has had enough guess what we will all be in the dark
I can’t understand it if you don’t like what he says or disagree just don’t read it
Simple really
Time the pile on people think of others that value his contribution because when he is gone he’s gone
If anyone wants to abuse me for my thoughts go for it here’s my reply
-fuckoff !
 
We have an highly paid highly educated professional that once worked for the Club who is clearly a blue and is the chosen subject matter expert on national radio
Yet people abuse the guy - madness
If and when Stephan has had enough guess what we will all be in the dark
I can’t understand it if you don’t like what he says or disagree just don’t read it
Simple really
Time the pile on people think of others that value his contribution because when he is gone he’s gone
If anyone wants to abuse me for my thoughts go for it here’s my reply
-fuckoff !
Spot on. I don’t read anything I disagree with. It’s a choice I make, like only watching United on TV when they lose!
 
It’s actually embarrassing when some are trying to inform others who are interested in all this,and for a good number of us it gets dumbed down to help us understand the issues at hand,but for some I don’t get it how they want to abuse another blue,maybe it’s a needy thing or attention seeking..
 
It’s not a communication issue. Colin simply believes the case is much less serious for the reasons he’s set out. He’s entitled to that view. I disagree and have pointed out numerous times the indicators to support my view. But honestly I can’t be arsed going over it again and again.

But I think it is a good idea that his view is added to the Q&A which I think, he thought, was me taking the piss.

And btw if people still can’t see that even the lawyers involved in these cases aren’t sure of the right answer I can’t help you. Most of the time people go into hearings thinking they have the better of the arguments but one side loses. There are no certainties and not everything has an answer even less so when we are piecing it together without the key docs.
FWIW I was asked to look again at our prior discussion of these points in early January on the other thread and we already all agreed that broadly RPT was in play in the mix. I think it is only about the emphasis on certain of the range of issues and therefore what that means to seriousness of an adverse outcome. It is around here for anyone that does want to relive that discussion. https://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/...aches-of-financial-rules.358514/post-17823780
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top