PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

supercity88 said:
The PL clubs should stop pressurising the PL to take pointless legal action then. They'd be better spending a lot more money up front to ensure their rules are lawful in the first place. If they're bringing rules to the table that a club with history of winning legal cases suggests are unlawful wouldn't it be prudent to get them checked at that stage and prior to a vote.
Click to expand...
LOL. We know exactly who is pressuring them to take the "pointless legal action". It serves a purpose for those clubs.
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
Charlie Vietch is a leach. I watched him for a while until I realised the shit he is actually doing. I don't like watching homeless, druggies being exploited for clicks. And the taxpayer pays for those police that have to turn up to sort out the trouble he attracts and creates.

He just one of those people that life/ humanity would be better without.

His fans love him, they love that exploitative shit.
Click to expand...
Absolute full on gammon ****.

If you do actions or go somewhere where there is a possibility of your safety being compromised enough for the police to be called out to protect you, you are actually liable for those policing costs.
Mike Ashley came up and had a meal knowing that there would be protestors outside.
Although the protest was peaceful, and no one was going to attack him, he felt the need to phone the police for an escort out.
People were phoning our local police HQ to make sure that he was actually billed for it.
 
Lord Blue said:
any news on the PL 115 case?

struggling to find anything among all this charlie veitch media stuff
Click to expand...
Except for a bus claiming we are the FFP champions, there's nothing new under the Blue Moon—just the same boring tax lawyers and accountants rebranded as football finance experts, enjoying their 115 minutes of fame, guessing what we're accused of, what evidence the PL might have, and what punishment we might get.
 
Did anyone else hear the rumour at the match Sunday of a 20 point deduction ruling?
I only heard it was told to a leading member of one of the supporters branches but I've not seen/heard it anywhere else since so I presume (pray) its just nonsense.
 
Honestly not trying to catch anyone, just something I heard.
If it was true I'd have expected it to be all over this forum by now.
 
feedthegoat said:
Did anyone else hear the rumour at the match Sunday of a 20 point deduction ruling?
I only heard it was told to a leading member of one of the supporters branches but I've not seen/heard it anywhere else since so I presume (pray) its just nonsense.
Click to expand...

Leading positions at the club don't even know what the ruling is yet mate, let alone the supporters clubs.

If anything, as usual, it will be the supporters that are last to know.
 
feedthegoat said:
Honestly not trying to catch anyone, just something I heard.
If it was true I'd have expected it to be all over this forum by now.
Click to expand...
I said you'd catch a few as someone reported exactly the same after the away game at Anfield. That's why I thought you were taking the piss.

It's bollocks, the same as all the rumours that the PL were dropping the charges were bollocks.
 
KS55 said:
Worth remembering that this panel will not specify a punishment for any infraction of the rules. As I understand it, that will be the subject of a later hearing. Am I wrong?
Click to expand...
Fucking hell, " we find you guilty, now it goes to some other **** for the next few years to decide your sentence"
 
feedthegoat said:
Did anyone else hear the rumour at the match Sunday of a 20 point deduction ruling?
I only heard it was told to a leading member of one of the supporters branches but I've not seen/heard it anywhere else since so I presume (pray) its just nonsense.
Click to expand...

Leading member of a supporters branch?

Fuck me, we’re fucked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top