City’s New Kits

[CC1]

IF true - that's horrible and why do we need to add a sash.
History means nothing to the club these days

So for the sake of history, the shirt has to be almost the same every year? What do you suggest?

 

[Cobwebcat]

View attachment 148021

I'm sure this will go down well.

I dont hate it, but I liked the white sleeves in 06/07 so...

Not against the sash but it should just be a clean white rather than tonal.

Don’t like any navy on the home strip particularly the sponsor but then you can’t have shoe on white.

It needs ironing!

 

[CC1]

It's much more than that.....

It's a NATION STATE !!

Definitely means more :-). Ask Trent

 

[mattcity5]

Not against the sash but it should just be a clean white rather than tonal.

I think i prefer it kind of blended as it is, we've never had a straightforward sash on our home shirt and to me it'd stand out too much.

I'm still not convinced either way though tbh.

 

[domalino]

I see it’s the time of year when a shitty leaked photo of a sweatshop knockoff causes everyone to get very worked up about a kit that’s 90% the same as every other City home kit.

And then the legit version is released in July, photographed properly and worn by players and it looks fine.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Not a fan, if that is correct.

 

[Blue_Lightsaber]

Isn't the sash on the wrong way??

But yuck!

 

[iwasthere1968]

Shite

 

[give it to gordon]

View attachment 148021

I'm sure this will go down well.

I dont hate it, but I liked the white sleeves in 06/07 so...

Yuk

 

[CityDE]

Looking back it's great that we won the CL/ treble in our best home kit of the Puma era.
Not a fan of the leaked shirt.

 

[Kippax Street 1880]

View attachment 148021

I'm sure this will go down well.

I dont hate it, but I liked the white sleeves in 06/07 so...

Actually dont hate that, given its a poor photo and will probably look better in person

 

[richards30]

I see it’s the time of year when a shitty leaked photo of a sweatshop knockoff causes everyone to get very worked up about a kit that’s 90% the same as every other City home kit.

And then the legit version is released in July, photographed properly and worn by players and it looks fine.

Exactly!! For a start it will be a much lighter shade of blue! I really like it actually and has a round neck finally!

 

[jimharri]

Isn't the sash on the wrong way??

But yuck!

If you go back to the early 70s, then no.






I loved that kit. It's a shame that it ended up with Palace.

 

[Mancini’s Pastilles]

Just when you think puma cant do worse, they go and top it

 

[samuelyeboah]

looks good to me? who gives a shit

 

[Mike N]

The old bore from Burnage didn’t design that one as well, did he?

 

[jamielowndes]

So for the sake of history, the shirt has to be almost the same every year? What do you suggest?

If it doesn't weigh 30lbs in the rain, take it back.

 

[WesthoughtonJohn]

So for the sake of history, the shirt has to be almost the same every year? What do you suggest?

Didn't say that at all did I???
I'm saying we've NEVER had a sash on home shirts - do what they want with away kits (apart from the club world cup ones) - by all means make it different but the basics should remain the same

 

[urban genie]

View attachment 148021

I'm sure this will go down well.

I dont hate it, but I liked the white sleeves in 06/07 so...

makes me think we have been found guilty so getting a kit worthy of the 2nd division and nowhere else

 

[pbueno16]

View attachment 148021

I'm sure this will go down well.

I dont hate it, but I liked the white sleeves in 06/07 so...

Send that back to whatever depth of hell it came from.