Gone for a Burton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2022
- Messages
- 6,398
- Team supported
- City
Pity the MDT & the hysterical, non match attending morons that infest it, don't get carried away.Steady... lets not get carried away
Is it a money maker ??
Pity the MDT & the hysterical, non match attending morons that infest it, don't get carried away.Steady... lets not get carried away
“Defences are split” over a YouTube video of Elbow.
People have lost their mind.
It’s no problem anyway. It’s a football forum ffs, it’s not life or death.
Funny for us to be destroyed ?
Ok so funny that would have done something wrong and be punished do you want us to suffer who do you support ?It's so ridiculous that the idea of it makes me laugh.
Posters still yapping on about TH.
Why do people feel the need to ramble on about his info and how that information is delivered.
Put him on ignore and everyone will be a lot better off.
Ok so funny that would have done something wrong and be punished do you want us to suffer who do you support ?
The pile on to any criticism is unwarranted. You see it in plenty of threads. The herd mentality takes over and the few outspoken voices soon get run over and put down.The main issue is that criticising him is treated as a cardinal sin on this forum.
But it's embarassingly sycophantic that anyone could dare to suggest that 'all he did was post an Elbow music video, you all imagined the rest'. He is the only person who has ever tried to create the image of 'If Tolmie posts a music video, we should assume that he is posting a direct clue about concrete inside news'. We didn't make that up, we're not schizophrenic. That's the reputation he has because that's exactly what he wanted and he actively cultivated it.
The 'he's just doing it to entertain us' image comes entirely from other people. He presents himself as an inside source of information who should be listened to and respected. I've never once seen him say 'guys don't take me seriously, I'm purely here for your entertainment and don't have any information'. That's purely an image that other users projected onto him. All the information from the horse's mouth suggests that he does not want to be viewed as entertainment at all, but as a serious journalist. He wrote an essay about it on X.
My personal opinion is that Tolmie doesn't currently have any real knowledge of the inside workings of City at all, and he drops hints for apparently no reason other than he likes winding people up. I think that he moved to X because he thought it would get him more attention than he was getting here, and he moved back here because the people on X were far far quicker to catch on to him than he expected.
To be clear, that's purely my opinion of his footballing knowledge. It is pretty much undeniable that he is a very decent person in real life and has dedicated a huge amount of his life to helping children from challenging circumstances - if I was not in exactly the same boat, having worked with young people for my entire adult life, I probably wouldn't bother calling him out whatsoever.
But some people will say he's just doing it for fun and isn't claiming to be a real source of knowledge, and some people will say he does it out of the goodness of his heart and it's not his fault that he's usually incorrect. By definition, that means defences are split.
Then you must have missed Tolmie's explanation...My personal opinion is that Tolmie doesn't currently have any real knowledge of the inside workings of City at all, and he drops hints for apparently no reason other than he likes winding people up. I think that he moved to X because he thought it would get him more attention than he was getting here, and he moved back here because the people on X were far far quicker to catch on to him than he expected.
To be clear, that's purely my opinion of his footballing knowledge. It is pretty much undeniable that he is a very decent person in real life and has dedicated a huge amount of his life to helping children from challenging circumstances - if I was not in exactly the same boat, having worked with young people for my entire adult life, I probably wouldn't bother calling him out whatsoever.
But some people will say he's just doing it for fun and isn't claiming to be a real source of knowledge, and some people will say he does it out of the goodness of his heart and it's not his fault that he's usually incorrect. By definition, that means defences are split.
I'd say that's inside information or relevant research.Apologies, TGIF!!
Some kind person tipped me off about certain agents asking City for assurances re the current case.
I've done some asking and stood it up.
City, as they did in January, and are now doing in current negotiations for players this summer, are insisting to their clients that there is nothing to be concerned about.
To be honest, I don't know why I didn't think before that agents would be asking those questions.
I was put on to it by a fellow Blue with a contact not far from UEFA HQ.
Not a home run, but a very decent one at this late stage in the game!!
Sounds like it. I’m not sure it’s a huge revelation though as many fans have deduced the same thing over recent months (without the inside info of course).Then you must have missed Tolmie's explanation...
I'd say that's inside information or relevant research.
Have you seen how some posters act on here, you've been here long enough to know, we have a very wide spectrum truly knowledgeable ones to complete fanny wipes with all points in-between.Sure, but a few posters get genuinely quite offended and angry if you say that Tolmie doesn't have any info. It's a have cake/eat too situation.
This thread is a good example - a lot of people have come to his defence, and from everything we hear he's a genuinely good guy in real life so I can understand that.
But their defences are split. Half are saying that his posts are harmless fun and shouldn't be taken seriously, and half are saying that his posts are genuine info he is passing on in good faith. If we all committed to the 'he's just trying to entertain us and we shouldn't take his posts as any indication of any real news' then it'd be no problem.
ICYMI - an explanation of why many “off book” costs are not “off book” at all
Mr Grumpy Pants this morning.No, he expressly stated it was easy to predict to outcome, which surely must invite supporting specifics; otherwise he’s undermining his own argument by failing to.
So it’s fuck all to do with me being a ‘details kinda guy’, but rather the suggestion to necessarily provide details to support the point being advanced.
Its a LITERAL FACT you mean.But it's embarassingly sycophantic that anyone could dare to suggest that 'all he did was post an Elbow music video, you all imagined the rest'.
Yes, harassing other users is against the rules you agree to when you sign up.The main issue is that criticising him is treated as a cardinal sin on this forum.
City reported additional costs of £89 million to uefa under their “reporting perimeter”. This perimeter includes any entity that generates income. So Tebas theory that we dump costs to companies mansour owns is bullshit. City must comply.This post appears to me to be worthy of more discussion than all these TH posts. Can anyone offer some expert opinion on what this means because I’m not capable?
Its a LITERAL FACT you mean.
The entire idea that something was being announced that day came from another poster who said it, not Tolm, then you all mixed it together. Feel free to look back.
Yes, harassing other users is against the rules you agree to when you sign up.
He posted something vague, YOU interpreted it wrongly and now you're being a mard arse about it. Nobody cares. Take the conversation elsewhere and block him. Simple.
The outcome will get announced when it gets announced, and we'll all know about it then.The main issue is that criticising him is treated as a cardinal sin on this forum.
But it's embarassingly sycophantic that anyone could dare to suggest that 'all he did was post an Elbow music video, you all imagined the rest'. He is the only person who has ever tried to create the image of 'If Tolmie posts a music video, we should assume that he is posting a direct clue about concrete inside news'. We didn't make that up, we're not schizophrenic. That's the reputation he has because that's exactly what he wanted and he actively cultivated it.
The 'he's just doing it to entertain us' image comes entirely from other people. He presents himself as an inside source of information who should be listened to and respected. I've never once seen him say 'guys don't take me seriously, I'm purely here for your entertainment and don't have any information'. That's purely an image that other users projected onto him because it is easier than accepting that they were wrong to trust him. All the information from the horse's mouth suggests that he does not want to be viewed as entertainment at all, but as a serious journalist. He wrote an essay about it on X.