PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

“Defences are split” over a YouTube video of Elbow.

People have lost their mind.

My personal opinion is that Tolmie doesn't currently have any real knowledge of the inside workings of City at all, and he drops hints for apparently no reason other than he likes winding people up. I think that he moved to X because he thought it would get him more attention than he was getting here, and he moved back here because the people on X were far far quicker to catch on to him than he expected.

To be clear, that's purely my opinion of his footballing knowledge. It is pretty much undeniable that he is a very decent person in real life and has dedicated a huge amount of his life to helping children from challenging circumstances - if I was not in exactly the same boat, having worked with young people for my entire adult life, I probably wouldn't bother calling him out whatsoever.

But some people will say he's just doing it for fun and isn't claiming to be a real source of knowledge, and some people will say he does it out of the goodness of his heart and it's not his fault that he's usually incorrect. By definition, that means defences are split.
 
It’s no problem anyway. It’s a football forum ffs, it’s not life or death.

Sure, but then people shouldn't get so defensive about him every time he gets called out for making a claim that doesn't come to fruition. If it's not life or death why are quite a few people genuinely angry whenever he's criticsed?
 
Posters still yapping on about TH.

Why do people feel the need to ramble on about his info and how that information is delivered?

Put him on ignore and everyone will be a lot better off.
 
Last edited:
Posters still yapping on about TH.

Why do people feel the need to ramble on about his info and how that information is delivered.

Put him on ignore and everyone will be a lot better off.

The main issue is that criticising him is treated as a cardinal sin on this forum.

But it's embarassingly sycophantic that anyone could dare to suggest that 'all he did was post an Elbow music video, you all imagined the rest'. He is the only person who has ever tried to create the image of 'If Tolmie posts a music video, we should assume that he is posting a direct clue about concrete inside news'. We didn't make that up, we're not schizophrenic. That's the reputation he has because that's exactly what he wanted and he actively cultivated it.

The 'he's just doing it to entertain us' image comes entirely from other people. He presents himself as an inside source of information who should be listened to and respected. I've never once seen him say 'guys don't take me seriously, I'm purely here for your entertainment and don't have any information'. That's purely an image that other users projected onto him because it is easier than accepting that they were wrong to trust him. All the information from the horse's mouth suggests that he does not want to be viewed as entertainment at all, but as a serious journalist. He wrote an essay about it on X.
 
Last edited:
Ok so funny that would have done something wrong and be punished do you want us to suffer who do you support ?

If we had been lied to for years and years by our board, the only way through that would be to laugh at the absurdity of it. I think I have been clear enough that I don't believe this is the case whatsoever.
 
The main issue is that criticising him is treated as a cardinal sin on this forum.

But it's embarassingly sycophantic that anyone could dare to suggest that 'all he did was post an Elbow music video, you all imagined the rest'. He is the only person who has ever tried to create the image of 'If Tolmie posts a music video, we should assume that he is posting a direct clue about concrete inside news'. We didn't make that up, we're not schizophrenic. That's the reputation he has because that's exactly what he wanted and he actively cultivated it.

The 'he's just doing it to entertain us' image comes entirely from other people. He presents himself as an inside source of information who should be listened to and respected. I've never once seen him say 'guys don't take me seriously, I'm purely here for your entertainment and don't have any information'. That's purely an image that other users projected onto him. All the information from the horse's mouth suggests that he does not want to be viewed as entertainment at all, but as a serious journalist. He wrote an essay about it on X.
The pile on to any criticism is unwarranted. You see it in plenty of threads. The herd mentality takes over and the few outspoken voices soon get run over and put down.

I am not here to answer for TH.

Still maintain that his reasons are his own and if you don’t agree, ignore. Posting a few music videos that may or may not give a clue won’t have any bearing on the 115 result.

Either way it’s not worth getting worked up about.
 
Last edited:
My personal opinion is that Tolmie doesn't currently have any real knowledge of the inside workings of City at all, and he drops hints for apparently no reason other than he likes winding people up. I think that he moved to X because he thought it would get him more attention than he was getting here, and he moved back here because the people on X were far far quicker to catch on to him than he expected.

To be clear, that's purely my opinion of his footballing knowledge. It is pretty much undeniable that he is a very decent person in real life and has dedicated a huge amount of his life to helping children from challenging circumstances - if I was not in exactly the same boat, having worked with young people for my entire adult life, I probably wouldn't bother calling him out whatsoever.

But some people will say he's just doing it for fun and isn't claiming to be a real source of knowledge, and some people will say he does it out of the goodness of his heart and it's not his fault that he's usually incorrect. By definition, that means defences are split.

You’re taking yourself way too seriously.
 
My personal opinion is that Tolmie doesn't currently have any real knowledge of the inside workings of City at all, and he drops hints for apparently no reason other than he likes winding people up. I think that he moved to X because he thought it would get him more attention than he was getting here, and he moved back here because the people on X were far far quicker to catch on to him than he expected.

To be clear, that's purely my opinion of his footballing knowledge. It is pretty much undeniable that he is a very decent person in real life and has dedicated a huge amount of his life to helping children from challenging circumstances - if I was not in exactly the same boat, having worked with young people for my entire adult life, I probably wouldn't bother calling him out whatsoever.

But some people will say he's just doing it for fun and isn't claiming to be a real source of knowledge, and some people will say he does it out of the goodness of his heart and it's not his fault that he's usually incorrect. By definition, that means defences are split.
Then you must have missed Tolmie's explanation...

Apologies, TGIF!!

Some kind person tipped me off about certain agents asking City for assurances re the current case.

I've done some asking and stood it up.

City, as they did in January, and are now doing in current negotiations for players this summer, are insisting to their clients that there is nothing to be concerned about.

To be honest, I don't know why I didn't think before that agents would be asking those questions.

I was put on to it by a fellow Blue with a contact not far from UEFA HQ.

Not a home run, but a very decent one at this late stage in the game!!
I'd say that's inside information or relevant research.
 
Then you must have missed Tolmie's explanation...


I'd say that's inside information or relevant research.
Sounds like it. I’m not sure it’s a huge revelation though as many fans have deduced the same thing over recent months (without the inside info of course).

I fully agree with Tolmie that it’s positive news though.
 
Sure, but a few posters get genuinely quite offended and angry if you say that Tolmie doesn't have any info. It's a have cake/eat too situation.

This thread is a good example - a lot of people have come to his defence, and from everything we hear he's a genuinely good guy in real life so I can understand that.

But their defences are split. Half are saying that his posts are harmless fun and shouldn't be taken seriously, and half are saying that his posts are genuine info he is passing on in good faith. If we all committed to the 'he's just trying to entertain us and we shouldn't take his posts as any indication of any real news' then it'd be no problem.
Have you seen how some posters act on here, you've been here long enough to know, we have a very wide spectrum truly knowledgeable ones to complete fanny wipes with all points in-between.

I think the only decent size thread that didn't end up in arguements was when Rik Mayall died.

It's always been a case of sifting through the crap and using the ignore button to keep the board at an acceptable level.
 
No, he expressly stated it was easy to predict to outcome, which surely must invite supporting specifics; otherwise he’s undermining his own argument by failing to.

So it’s fuck all to do with me being a ‘details kinda guy’, but rather the suggestion to necessarily provide details to support the point being advanced.
Mr Grumpy Pants this morning.
 
But it's embarassingly sycophantic that anyone could dare to suggest that 'all he did was post an Elbow music video, you all imagined the rest'.
Its a LITERAL FACT you mean.

The entire idea that something was being announced that day came from another poster who said it, not Tolm, then you all mixed it together. Feel free to look back.

The main issue is that criticising him is treated as a cardinal sin on this forum.
Yes, harassing other users is against the rules you agree to when you sign up.

He posted something vague, YOU interpreted it wrongly and now you're being a mard arse about it. Nobody cares. Take the conversation elsewhere and block him. Simple.
 
This post appears to me to be worthy of more discussion than all these TH posts. Can anyone offer some expert opinion on what this means because I’m not capable?
City reported additional costs of £89 million to uefa under their “reporting perimeter”. This perimeter includes any entity that generates income. So Tebas theory that we dump costs to companies mansour owns is bullshit. City must comply.

The £89 million covers costs both from inside the cfg and outside entities.

Probably some accounting tactic. No doubt masters will be along soon to investigate.

anyway, that probably don’t give much meat on the bones. Need the accounting nerds to explain the nuts and bolts.
 
Last edited:
Its a LITERAL FACT you mean.

The entire idea that something was being announced that day came from another poster who said it, not Tolm, then you all mixed it together. Feel free to look back.


Yes, harassing other users is against the rules you agree to when you sign up.

He posted something vague, YOU interpreted it wrongly and now you're being a mard arse about it. Nobody cares. Take the conversation elsewhere and block him. Simple.

It's like Tolmie isn't allowed a sense of humour when he quite obviously is, some people take this football palaver a bit too seriously.
 
I think anybody else would be banned or warned for consistent wumming no?

No pile on here and I appreciate he posts in good faith, but always in riddles and Friday was a joke, he pulled the pin out and threw the grenade as far as possible, to then come back hours later with an explanation.

There is an element of attention seeking to it otherwise he'd just spit it out. I actually enjoy it around transfers, I think with this though we are all worked up and want to know any crumb of info, not being pissed about
 
The main issue is that criticising him is treated as a cardinal sin on this forum.

But it's embarassingly sycophantic that anyone could dare to suggest that 'all he did was post an Elbow music video, you all imagined the rest'. He is the only person who has ever tried to create the image of 'If Tolmie posts a music video, we should assume that he is posting a direct clue about concrete inside news'. We didn't make that up, we're not schizophrenic. That's the reputation he has because that's exactly what he wanted and he actively cultivated it.

The 'he's just doing it to entertain us' image comes entirely from other people. He presents himself as an inside source of information who should be listened to and respected. I've never once seen him say 'guys don't take me seriously, I'm purely here for your entertainment and don't have any information'. That's purely an image that other users projected onto him because it is easier than accepting that they were wrong to trust him. All the information from the horse's mouth suggests that he does not want to be viewed as entertainment at all, but as a serious journalist. He wrote an essay about it on X.
The outcome will get announced when it gets announced, and we'll all know about it then.

In the meantime people taking anything Tolm says as gospel, and people criticising him for playing up to the weak-minded need to give their heads a wobble. What happened to our supposed sense of humour, and ability to laugh at ourselves?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top