PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Superace said:
I was told by a few people, but it's not to hard to accept that, that would be the case, whether that's enough to classed as non cooperating remains to be seen, either way if that's all they have on us then it's happy days.
Click to expand...
Bullshit.
 
Eric Hitchmough said:
Morning @slbsn does Billy’s claim about City not being in possession of the verdict tally with what you’ve heard in recent days?
Click to expand...
I lost track of exactly what was said by Billy. But nobody I have heard from/spoken to has heard the parties now have a draft decision. And Billy would not share something here on this that he wasn't sure about.
 
frothy said:
Your the cupcake, it's a fucking Muffin ask for a Chip Barm in Denton and they will think you are a not right
Click to expand...
I grow up in South Manchester. I would say bacon barm but also chip muffin. If I was buying the bread with nothing in it then I'd ask for a barmcake unless it was an oven bottomed muffin
 
Damocles said:
It's not a football channel and I'm not sure if he's alright with linking it. It's a racing game thing. He's really fucking quick. Like absolutely mauling semi professional and professional racing drivers type quick.
Click to expand...



This the one? He's great if so
 
DJBusinesscake said:
So we're definitely fucked?
Click to expand...

This is the ultimate head fuck.

I was working on the basis that no news was good news as it would be leaked if we had lost.

No we're being told the complete opposite.

If Pannick et al pitch up at the hearing centre again then we will know it's gone tits up.
 
Just want a resolution on this now. We can't have this shitshow hanging over us going into the off season.

Didn't Pep suggest a judgement in February?
 
jaiguruKun said:
This is the ultimate head fuck.

I was working on the basis that no news was good news as it would be leaked if we had lost.

No we're being told the complete opposite.

If Pannick et al pitch up at the hearing centre again then we will know it's gone tits up.
Click to expand...
Told by who?
 
slbsn said:
Yes, I think holding back the reasons for the liability decision is more likely to happen if City liable for the serious stuff.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that if we don't hear anything in the foreseeable the likely implication is that the findings of the initial hearing are being held back until the findings of the sanctioning hearing are released?

And by extension, that means we're more likely to have been found against for the more serious charges than the non-cooperation allegations?

Thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top