PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

slbsn said:
Name one City fan (I assume you mean me but put me to one side for this question), "happy to sell their club down the river in furtherance of their media prospects and bulging wallets."

So name a single person
Click to expand...
I mean all the people who fall into that category, and yes, I would include you in that. Where in all your media appearances do you countenance that City might be vindicated and explain why? You dismiss that it's a witch-hunt is conspiracy theory, but are very happy to go along with what City are accused of isn't conspiracy theory.

I saw you in a Football Insider (?) cast a week or so ago, and one of the first things you did was to stop yourself in your tracks and reconsider what you had been going to say. Or more correctly, to invert the clauses of the conditional sentence you had started. So that it would make a bigger impact, you moved a worst case City hypothetical clause, that you had volunteered without prompting, from the end of the sentence to the front. You were giving your interviewer the soundbite he was looking for. You did something similar on Talksport. Similar to Kieran Maguire in a podcast a few days earlier, you used 'wills' rather than 'woulds' to mismatch conceivable 'if' clauses with low likelihood subjunctives.

He may be right or he may be wrong, but the only person I can think of in the mainstream media who has expounded the City case is Martin Samuel, and 'apparently' that's only because his son works for City. Jamie Carragher stood on the pitch at the Etihad and accused City of cheating and Micah Richards took it up the ass. Simon Jordan did similar with his Lee Harvey Oswald James Earl Ray 'Nation State' rants and you let him do it. Paul Dickov's on Sky for 2 minutes and pulls up Kaveh Solhekol. Mike Summerbee didn't get invited back for telling it as it was. Those are the kinds of City pundits we need more of.
 
A friend works at the dept of the Environment creating defences against flooding. He tells me they have had a meeting to forecast the amount of piss our exoneration will create and how to combat it. They decided there was no possible defence without help from 3m beavers. Accordingly they have forged some ‘evidence’ against us and sent it to Masters. They expect us to be found guilty on all charges with the verdict announced by Spitty on Friday.
 
Nephin Man said:
I mean all the people who fall into that category, and yes, I would include you in that. Where in all your media appearances do you countenance that City might be vindicated and explain why? You dismiss that it's a witch-hunt is conspiracy theory, but are very happy to go along with what City are accused of isn't conspiracy theory.

I saw you in a Football Insider (?) cast a week or so ago, and one of the first things you did was to stop yourself in your tracks and reconsider what you had been going to say. Or more correctly, to invert the clauses of the conditional sentence you had started. So that it would make a bigger impact, you moved a worst case City hypothetical clause, that you had volunteered without prompting, from the end of the sentence to the front. You were giving your interviewer the soundbite he was looking for. You did something similar on Talksport. Similar to Kieran Maguire in a podcast a few days earlier, you used 'wills' rather than 'woulds' to mismatch conceivable 'if' clauses with low likelihood subjunctives.

He may be right or he may be wrong, but the only person I can think of in the mainstream media who has expounded the City case is Martin Samuel, and 'apparently' that's only because his son works for City. Jamie Carragher stood on the pitch at the Etihad and accused City of cheating and Micah Richards took it up the ass. Simon Jordan did similar with his Lee Harvey Oswald James Earl Ray 'Nation State' rants and you let him do it. Paul Dickov's on Sky for 2 minutes and pulls up Kaveh Solhekol. Mike Summerbee didn't get invited back for telling it as it was. Those are the kinds of City pundits we need more of.
Click to expand...
Crikey! You are mad.
PS I missed the name of the person Stefan asked you for. You could have mentioned Conn artist.
 
Nephin Man said:
I mean all the people who fall into that category, and yes, I would include you in that. Where in all your media appearances do you countenance that City might be vindicated and explain why? You dismiss that it's a witch-hunt is conspiracy theory, but are very happy to go along with what City are accused of isn't conspiracy theory.

I saw you in a Football Insider (?) cast a week or so ago, and one of the first things you did was to stop yourself in your tracks and reconsider what you had been going to say. Or more correctly, to invert the clauses of the conditional sentence you had started. So that it would make a bigger impact, you moved a worst case City hypothetical clause, that you had volunteered without prompting, from the end of the sentence to the front. You were giving your interviewer the soundbite he was looking for. You did something similar on Talksport. Similar to Kieran Maguire in a podcast a few days earlier, you used 'wills' rather than 'woulds' to mismatch conceivable 'if' clauses with low likelihood subjunctives.

He may be right or he may be wrong, but the only person I can think of in the mainstream media who has expounded the City case is Martin Samuel, and 'apparently' that's only because his son works for City. Jamie Carragher stood on the pitch at the Etihad and accused City of cheating and Micah Richards took it up the ass. Simon Jordan did similar with his Lee Harvey Oswald James Earl Ray 'Nation State' rants and you let him do it. Paul Dickov's on Sky for 2 minutes and pulls up Kaveh Solhekol. Mike Summerbee didn't get invited back for telling it as it was. Those are the kinds of City pundits we need more of.
Click to expand...
What a load of total shite. “Invert the clauses of the conditional” blah blah. Get a grip. Clown
 
KS55 said:
A friend works at the dept of the Environment creating defences against flooding. He tells me they have had a meeting to forecast the amount of piss our exoneration will create and how to combat it. They decided there was no possible defence without help from 3m beavers. Accordingly they have forged some ‘evidence’ against us and sent it to Masters. They expect us to be found guilty on all charges with the verdict announced by Spitty on Friday.
Click to expand...
3 m beavers ? Where do I sign up hopefully I can find fit ones
 
Nephin Man said:
I saw you in a Football Insider (?) cast a week or so ago, and one of the first things you did was to stop yourself in your tracks and reconsider what you had been going to say. Or more correctly, to invert the clauses of the conditional sentence you had started. So that it would make a bigger impact, you moved a worst case City hypothetical clause, that you had volunteered without prompting, from the end of the sentence to the front. You were giving your interviewer the soundbite he was looking for. You did something similar on Talksport. Similar to Kieran Maguire in a podcast a few days earlier, you used 'wills' rather than 'woulds' to mismatch conceivable 'if' clauses with low likelihood subjunctives.
Click to expand...

This seems somewhat far fetched, unless Borson is the smartest linguist in the history of the world, to have considered and thought about all of this with that level of depth and judgement while briefly pausing for half a second
 
Damocles said:
I don't think anybody in the world is saying to people "come here and we'll give you money to insult your football club".

It's like QI. People might be shocked to hear this but after 20-odd seasons now, Alan Davies has probably worked out that the answer that first comes to his head is going to set off the alarms. But he says it, he understands his role in the show. It's a work.

Similarly, Roy Keane probably doesn't really hold really passionate views on whether Justin Kluivert dived or not. But its a show and he's worked out his role.

If I was invited onto a rivals podcast, I don't know, let's just say a Real Madrid one, and they all started laughing about how Madrid are the biggest and best team ever and City are small then I understand that if I wanted to be invited back for future appearances then pointing to viewing figures and revenue growths and recent results isn't going to get me that. Playing the fool, the humble but accepting fan is. Alan Colmes sat next to Sean Hannity for decades doing exactly this.

People are naturally agreeable and friendly. In a group of 10 people, where they are the 1 newly invited guest, they are going to want to make good impressions and come across well so the compulsion to correct errors and fight the corner is lessened and even more so when you have a financial stake in not doing that. So while you wont agree that Haaland is a BTEC Solanke, you might chip in that he's disappointing and focus on the negative to be part of the group. Rather than saying "hes literally the best goalscorer in the history of the PL you plebs".

You're a wealthy guy who is esteemed. TalkSport need you more than you need them so you can figuratively tell Simon Jordan thats he's a plank and its fine. You do this for fun and to educate. People who need the few quid that these shitehawks will throw at them are much more agreeable with the negativity and the outright bullshit they come out with and it turns them into the Uncle Tom's I mentioned earlier. They understand their role in the show going in, and it isn't to be a bastion of truth and knowledge.
Click to expand...

Chomsky explains it well.

 
bobbyowenquiff said:
There is no doubt it has been a smear campaign. Khaldoon has publically stated this. You can go back to the two emails being pasted together, the relentless leaks from the UEFA case of information directly from the investigations team itself, the negative media briefings and whispers, the hateful 8 letter, even the press releases from the PL comms team have been distorted and biased to show City in a bad light. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is just a fact.
Click to expand...
Always surprised me that no rep in the media / TV punditry ever mentioned at the time or now to this day the Scouse cunts hacking us every game they play in..
You know like they do to us..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top