Politicians are incompetent... aren't they?

I believe j gave you a reason why people may do it not that they necessarily should. Anyhow if it means dodgy fuckers get in tte gamble failed, if it means the current big two worry and maybe change then it worked. And that's if you believe the current lot aren't dodgy.

Arguing about which of the two main parties are the worse when there are so close together doesnf seem worth the effort.

We have risk averse politicians and voters unfortunately.
I get where you're coming from, voting as a way to shake things up makes sense on the surface, especially when the major parties feel indistinguishable. But pushing support toward the far edges just to force change can be a dangerous gamble.

If that protest vote ends up shifting the Overton Window and dragging mainstream politics further toward extremism then even if the big two do respond, it's in a direction that will not serve the UKs best interests. It’s not worked, merely trading one set of problems for another worse set of problems.

I agree with you that there is risk aversion in both politicians and voters, but the best way to bring about real, lasting change is to get involved. Join one of the main parties and push from within. It’s not as easy as protest voting, but it's far more effective long term.

If immigration is genuinely in the top three concerns for the average voter, then the country must be doing reasonably well overall for it to even register. So what is driving it as a hot-button issue that would have people vote for extreme parties, especially for the working class? Is it deeper economic anxiety being redirected by unscrupulous politicians with help from the media, playing on prejudices and resentment within communities? That’s where the real conversation should be not just punishing the status quo for the sake of it.
 
I get where you're coming from, voting as a way to shake things up makes sense on the surface, especially when the major parties feel indistinguishable. But pushing support toward the far edges just to force change can be a dangerous gamble.

If that protest vote ends up shifting the Overton Window and dragging mainstream politics further toward extremism then even if the big two do respond, it's in a direction that will not serve the UKs best interests. It’s not worked, merely trading one set of problems for another worse set of problems.

I agree with you that there is risk aversion in both politicians and voters, but the best way to bring about real, lasting change is to get involved. Join one of the main parties and push from within. It’s not as easy as protest voting, but it's far more effective long term.

If immigration is genuinely in the top three concerns for the average voter, then the country must be doing reasonably well overall for it to even register. So what is driving it as a hot-button issue that would have people vote for extreme parties, especially for the working class? Is it deeper economic anxiety being redirected by unscrupulous politicians with help from the media, playing on prejudices and resentment within communities? That’s where the real conversation should be not just punishing the status quo for the sake of it.
Change from within isn't really an option at this time imho, for instance I believe Labour members voted on our voting system. It was ignored by those in charge, why? Because once they get in those in the trough aren't having their shit taken away from them.

Lib dems agreed to a coalition based on a vote on PR, the main two actively campaigned against it, why? Who are the parties that gain most from fptp? Nothing to do with whats right.

Let's look at our old favorite immigration decades of promises of reduction, up and up it went, free movement of people. Any negatives ignored. What eventually happened? Ukip started getting more and more popular and the status quo gambled on doing nothing, this time they lost big time. Some are still crying nine years later, lessons learnt? Zip.

A wake up call for them maybe? Not a chance. They're the adults you see, the smart ones, only they ain't. Their supporters have just voted in a Labour Party to get rid of the Tories and they have ended up with the Tory party very clever. And the Govt themselves? Well they finally got in and they are lost in a sea of desperation.

Anyhow we have to hope the left can get their act together and start putting pressure on this current lot. One day we may have an actual choice again.

Maybe then some posters on here will stop pretending they agree with who they voted for all the time and discuss in good faith.

Easier just to pretend that those with a different view are stupid, racist or wums though and they will all just vanish. We won't though. Clever lot.

Anyhow must stop moaning as we've never had it so good:-)

I do genuinely appreciate the reply and I hope you have a least seen where im at even if you don't agree.

Interesting times.
 
Part of the problem is that a significant section of society feels insecure.

I believe it was a deliberate Tory policy to make people feel insecure as insecure people tend to accept lower wages and be more compliant. They may also work harder in an attempt to prove their value.

Many jobs are very insecure these days and the job-for-life (once commonplace) is now rare. You have less chance of buying a house (on a normal wage) and even less of being given a secure tenancy. (Council houses used to be yours for life except in the most extreme of circumstances.)

Add in competition from unskilled immigrants for low-paid jobs and the slashing of the welfare state and NHS, and you can see that a fair proportion of us are not that far away from the park bench. So a lot of the anger - not all - is understandable.

Yet I see many angry pensioners to whom none of this insecurity applies. They often have their own homes, and all have a secure income for life—maybe not enough, but secure.

So insecurity, as such, cannot be the whole problem, can it?
 
Change from within isn't really an option at this time imho, for instance I believe Labour members voted on our voting system. It was ignored by those in charge, why? Because once they get in those in the trough aren't having their shit taken away from them.

Lib dems agreed to a coalition based on a vote on PR, the main two actively campaigned against it, why? Who are the parties that gain most from fptp? Nothing to do with whats right.

Let's look at our old favorite immigration decades of promises of reduction, up and up it went, free movement of people. Any negatives ignored. What eventually happened? Ukip started getting more and more popular and the status quo gambled on doing nothing, this time they lost big time. Some are still crying nine years later, lessons learnt? Zip.

A wake up call for them maybe? Not a chance. They're the adults you see, the smart ones, only they ain't. Their supporters have just voted in a Labour Party to get rid of the Tories and they have ended up with the Tory party very clever. And the Govt themselves? Well they finally got in and they are lost in a sea of desperation.

Anyhow we have to hope the left can get their act together and start putting pressure on this current lot. One day we may have an actual choice again.

Maybe then some posters on here will stop pretending they agree with who they voted for all the time and discuss in good faith.

Easier just to pretend that those with a different view are stupid, racist or wums though and they will all just vanish. We won't though. Clever lot.

Anyhow must stop moaning as we've never had it so good:-)

I do genuinely appreciate the reply and I hope you have a least seen where im at even if you don't agree.

Interesting times.

Being right, which is a curse and a blessing, is not dependant on votes or the number of people agreeing with you. Has Brexit reduced immigration? No. Has it improved the trading conditions for the UK? No. Did the Northern Ireland border prove to be a problem which could only be fixed by imposing a customs border within our own Union? Yes.

I was right on Brexit and it wasn’t even hard. The EU’s primary function is to facilitate trade between member states. If you are outside of this facilitation then, obviously, trade becomes more onerous and more expensive. This is not hard to grasp. Yet, many refuse to grasp it, vote accordingly and I am the one who failed to learn the lesson? What lesson was I meant to learn? That I lack the blind faith of those who argued we were far too important and we would get a better deal than membership? Yeah, I do lack blind faith. I prefer reality. Probably why I’m an atheist.

Freedom of movement is the removal of Government interference in where you live and work. And this is a bad thing? Getting Government out of our business? You want Governments telling you where you can work and live? Weird, but no accounting for taste. Any why would removing freedom of movement reduce immigration? Does it stop people coming here? No. Does it encourage people to settle here permanently and make immigration ‘stickier’? Yes, because you have removed choice from a group of people - except we didn’t. They still had choice. They still had 28 countries to choose from. They choose not to come here. Hurrah! Say Brexiteers. Great, and say hello to people from elsewhere who fill the gaps and put down roots because that is the only option. They don’t have the freedom to flit between respective countries because of geography or they had the right to do so.

A Labour Govt was the only choice mainly because it would actually govern rather than cooking up bizarre schemes like an incompetent Bond villain. Things have to work. The State needs to be administered. And that the current Govt is doing with varying degrees of competence. Having voted for them I am not suddenly bound to support everything they do. I largely agreed with the budget and I largely disagree with the Spring statement. I do know that they have to satisfy the markets with their fiscal competence. That is the world we live in - hello Liz Truss, but I disagree with the way they addressed the issue. And that is it.

I have no interest in trying to understand Reform, Brexit voters or whatever hobby horse of outrage they are currently rocking. I treat them as I would people who believe in a flat earth. It makes no sense and they are patently wrong. I have no idea if it’s stupidity, a desire to be different or a need to be contrary. I don’t regard it as my problem that they are unable to grasp, or won’t grasp, how the world works. I cannot make people see reality or the bleeding obvious, but I can and do take great pleasure in pointing it out and mocking them when reality, like Brexit, doesn’t meet their deluded expectations.

Will they continue to vote to wreck things or leave things? Of course they will. It’s pretty much all they have. Maybe it’s an addiction. Oh look I broke it, people are upset! Yay! I’ve got no cure for that and have no interest in finding one. The world is complex. A lot of people are too dumb to understand it and they break things. The end.
 
Being right, which is a curse and a blessing, is not dependant on votes or the number of people agreeing with you. Has Brexit reduced immigration? No. Has it improved the trading conditions for the UK? No. Did the Northern Ireland border prove to be a problem which could only be fixed by imposing a customs border within our own Union? Yes.

I was right on Brexit and it wasn’t even hard. The EU’s primary function is to facilitate trade between member states. If you are outside of this facilitation then, obviously, trade becomes more onerous and more expensive. This is not hard to grasp. Yet, many refuse to grasp it, vote accordingly and I am the one who failed to learn the lesson? What lesson was I meant to learn? That I lack the blind faith of those who argued we were far too important and we would get a better deal than membership? Yeah, I do lack blind faith. I prefer reality. Probably why I’m an atheist.

Freedom of movement is the removal of Government interference in where you live and work. And this is a bad thing? Getting Government out of our business? You want Governments telling you where you can work and live? Weird, but no accounting for taste. Any why would removing freedom of movement reduce immigration? Does it stop people coming here? No. Does it encourage people to settle here permanently and make immigration ‘stickier’? Yes, because you have removed choice from a group of people - except we didn’t. They still had choice. They still had 28 countries to choose from. They choose not to come here. Hurrah! Say Brexiteers. Great, and say hello to people from elsewhere who fill the gaps and put down roots because that is the only option. They don’t have the freedom to flit between respective countries because of geography or they had the right to do so.

A Labour Govt was the only choice mainly because it would actually govern rather than cooking up bizarre schemes like an incompetent Bond villain. Things have to work. The State needs to be administered. And that the current Govt is doing with varying degrees of competence. Having voted for them I am not suddenly bound to support everything they do. I largely agreed with the budget and I largely disagree with the Spring statement. I do know that they have to satisfy the markets with their fiscal competence. That is the world we live in - hello Liz Truss, but I disagree with the way they addressed the issue. And that is it.

I have no interest in trying to understand Reform, Brexit voters or whatever hobby horse of outrage they are currently rocking. I treat them as I would people who believe in a flat earth. It makes no sense and they are patently wrong. I have no idea if it’s stupidity, a desire to be different or a need to be contrary. I don’t regard it as my problem that they are unable to grasp, or won’t grasp, how the world works. I cannot make people see reality or the bleeding obvious, but I can and do take great pleasure in pointing it out and mocking them when reality, like Brexit, doesn’t meet their deluded expectations.

Will they continue to vote to wreck things or leave things? Of course they will. It’s pretty much all they have. Maybe it’s an addiction. Oh look I broke it, people are upset! Yay! I’ve got no cure for that and have no interest in finding one. The world is complex. A lot of people are too dumb to understand it and they break things. The end.

I didn't get past the first time you posted brexit, you have bored people with it for a decade.

50,000 kids in poverty thru these latest cuts, well done centrists, so clever, so right, so smug. So good at hiding from the Labour thread when they implement another Tory like policy that would have previously outraged them.
 
Being right, which is a curse and a blessing, is not dependant on votes or the number of people agreeing with you. Has Brexit reduced immigration? No. Has it improved the trading conditions for the UK? No. Did the Northern Ireland border prove to be a problem which could only be fixed by imposing a customs border within our own Union? Yes.

I was right on Brexit and it wasn’t even hard. The EU’s primary function is to facilitate trade between member states. If you are outside of this facilitation then, obviously, trade becomes more onerous and more expensive. This is not hard to grasp. Yet, many refuse to grasp it, vote accordingly and I am the one who failed to learn the lesson? What lesson was I meant to learn? That I lack the blind faith of those who argued we were far too important and we would get a better deal than membership? Yeah, I do lack blind faith. I prefer reality. Probably why I’m an atheist.

Freedom of movement is the removal of Government interference in where you live and work. And this is a bad thing? Getting Government out of our business? You want Governments telling you where you can work and live? Weird, but no accounting for taste. Any why would removing freedom of movement reduce immigration? Does it stop people coming here? No. Does it encourage people to settle here permanently and make immigration ‘stickier’? Yes, because you have removed choice from a group of people - except we didn’t. They still had choice. They still had 28 countries to choose from. They choose not to come here. Hurrah! Say Brexiteers. Great, and say hello to people from elsewhere who fill the gaps and put down roots because that is the only option. They don’t have the freedom to flit between respective countries because of geography or they had the right to do so.

A Labour Govt was the only choice mainly because it would actually govern rather than cooking up bizarre schemes like an incompetent Bond villain. Things have to work. The State needs to be administered. And that the current Govt is doing with varying degrees of competence. Having voted for them I am not suddenly bound to support everything they do. I largely agreed with the budget and I largely disagree with the Spring statement. I do know that they have to satisfy the markets with their fiscal competence. That is the world we live in - hello Liz Truss, but I disagree with the way they addressed the issue. And that is it.

I have no interest in trying to understand Reform, Brexit voters or whatever hobby horse of outrage they are currently rocking. I treat them as I would people who believe in a flat earth. It makes no sense and they are patently wrong. I have no idea if it’s stupidity, a desire to be different or a need to be contrary. I don’t regard it as my problem that they are unable to grasp, or won’t grasp, how the world works. I cannot make people see reality or the bleeding obvious, but I can and do take great pleasure in pointing it out and mocking them when reality, like Brexit, doesn’t meet their deluded expectations.

Will they continue to vote to wreck things or leave things? Of course they will. It’s pretty much all they have. Maybe it’s an addiction. Oh look I broke it, people are upset! Yay! I’ve got no cure for that and have no interest in finding one. The world is complex. A lot of people are too dumb to understand it and they break things. The end.
And your point is?
 
I didn't get past the first time you posted brexit, you have bored people with it for a decade.

50,000 kids in poverty thru these latest cuts, well done centrists, so clever, so right, so smug. So good at hiding from the Labour thread when they implement another Tory like policy that would have previously outraged them.
50,000 EXTRA kids in poverty from a government terrified of its own shadow.
Overall, it is estimated that in 2029/30 there will be 3.2 million families ... who will financially lose…[an average] of £1,720 per year.

Can’t tax the rich they’ll all run off (where they think they’re going, god knows).
Can’t tax the tax and pray on the poor as they’ve definitely got nowhere to go.

So the plan is growth?

In the last quarter of 2024, the UK experienced its highest number of business closures in 20 years… 198,046 companies… exceeding figures from the financial crisis in 2009 and 2021.
Companies House, have increased registration fees from £12 to £50… there’s been a 20% drop in new business registrations… the first decline since 2012.

All this to meet ‘fiscal rules’ she’s just made up. They’ve had 14 years to see what doesn’t work and seemingly they’ve learned nothing.
What a disappointment but what an opportunity for another bunch of absolute nutters to get elected….
 
50,000 EXTRA kids in poverty from a government terrified of its own shadow.
Overall, it is estimated that in 2029/30 there will be 3.2 million families ... who will financially lose…[an average] of £1,720 per year.

Can’t tax the rich they’ll all run off (where they think they’re going, god knows).
Can’t tax the tax and pray on the poor as they’ve definitely got nowhere to go.

So the plan is growth?

In the last quarter of 2024, the UK experienced its highest number of business closures in 20 years… 198,046 companies… exceeding figures from the financial crisis in 2009 and 2021.
Companies House, have increased registration fees from £12 to £50… there’s been a 20% drop in new business registrations… the first decline since 2012.

All this to meet ‘fiscal rules’ she’s just made up. They’ve had 14 years to see what doesn’t work and seemingly they’ve learned nothing.
What a disappointment but what an opportunity for another bunch of absolute nutters to get elected….

Although I agree with your sentiment about growth, I’d take the number of business closures with a pinch of salt given what you’ve said yourself there, companies house effectively did a big clean up and a lot of those wouldn’t have been viable businesses in the first place.

I get why politicians don’t do it and particularly after the last decade we’ve had already, but personally I just want to see more honesty. I don’t think we’re going to get growth for a long while, i think it will get worse and potentially a lot worse before it gets better.
 
I didn't get past the first time you posted brexit, you have bored people with it for a decade.

50,000 kids in poverty thru these latest cuts, well done centrists, so clever, so right, so smug. So good at hiding from the Labour thread when they implement another Tory like policy that would have previously outraged them.

Sirs. Your post above refers. Whether you read my post or not is your prerogative, but to tell me you didn’t read it implies that I care whether you read it or not. Please rest assured that this is not the case. Indeed, I assume that no response at all is a better indication of whether my post is of sufficient interest to you, or indeed any member of this forum.

Yours faithfully,

Bob.
 
This post should be framed in a monument somewhere. Or nailed to the wall of every classroom. Of course those who fail to read it (or understand it) are the ones who end up fucking us up in these periodic "pesky" cycles.

Of course that said . . . I do understand their emotional, visceral reactions. I have a thing for farmers, for example. I get that city folk often look down on them, yet if said urbanites were immersed in the agricultural world, many would be as useless as tits on a boar.

The question is what solutions we turn to to solve division and compromise to achieve maximum social benefit for as many people as possible, which should always be the goal of civiliz(s)ed democratic societies as designed.

If that's what's kept in mind, Reform or MAGA are INSTANT, IMMEDIATE rejects to any thoughtful good-hearted person ON THEIR FACE no matter the alternatives. It should be a reflex reaction -- you shouldn't even have to consider it -- because you KNOW "maximum social benefit for all" is NOT the aim.
He's a good un is Kowalski
 
Sirs. Your post above refers. Whether you read my post or not is your prerogative, but to tell me you didn’t read it implies that I care whether you read it or not. Please rest assured that this is not the case. Indeed, I assume that no response at all is a better indication of whether my post is of sufficient interest to you, or indeed any member of this forum.

Yours faithfully,

Bob.

Then why reply to me especially as i was talking to someone else, bright you:-)
 
Change from within isn't really an option at this time imho, for instance I believe Labour members voted on our voting system. It was ignored by those in charge, why? Because once they get in those in the trough aren't having their shit taken away from them.

Lib dems agreed to a coalition based on a vote on PR, the main two actively campaigned against it, why? Who are the parties that gain most from fptp? Nothing to do with whats right.
You're right Labour members overwhelmingly backed PR, yet the leadership shelved it. Nothing to do with what’s right just what protects power. The irony is Labour would likely have been in government more often since 1980 under PR, thanks to consistent anti-Tory majorities across the left and centre.

IMO parties are more open to internal influence when they're in power. When governing, they need to keep MPs onside to pass legislation and avoid leadership challenges makes them more likely to bend to internal pressure. In opposition, it's all posturing and purity tests. The Tories have understood this for years, win the election first, then let the infighting commence. Grab power then argue about which flavour of Thatcherism to reheat. Ruthless, but effective
Let's look at our old favorite immigration decades of promises of reduction, up and up it went, free movement of people. Any negatives ignored. What eventually happened? Ukip started getting more and more popular and the status quo gambled on doing nothing, this time they lost big time. Some are still crying nine years later, lessons learnt? Zip.
Immigration became a pressure valve the establishment ignored for too long, but let’s not pretend the conversation was one-sided. For decades, the UK debate was dominated by negative messaging, not silence.

The real issue wasn’t that no one talked about immigration it’s that the main parties failed to lead an honest conversation about why it happens, what levels are sustainable, and what the country needs. They dodged the hard questions and let the narrative drift and UKIP/Reform filled that vacuum with anger and simplicity.
A wake up call for them maybe? Not a chance. They're the adults you see, the smart ones, only they ain't. Their supporters have just voted in a Labour Party to get rid of the Tories and they have ended up with the Tory party very clever. And the Govt themselves? Well they finally got in and they are lost in a sea of desperation.

Anyhow we have to hope the left can get their act together and start putting pressure on this current lot. One day we may have an actual choice again.

Maybe then some posters on here will stop pretending they agree with who they voted for all the time and discuss in good faith.
Most people didn’t vote for Labour, they just wanted the Tories out. I was willing to give Starmer the benefit of the doubt, play it safe, don’t scare the media, get into No.10 and then deliver real change once inside. So far, it feels like we just swapped blue suits for red ties, with a bit more competence and a lot less culture war noise. That’s something, but it’s not transformation.

I’m with you, the left does need to get its act together. The problem is, Corbyn burned a lot of political capital, he led the left with all the tactical brilliance of a man trying to storm a castle armed with a spoon and a copy of The Morning Star, he made Boris look like Churchill in a hi-vis vest. We need ambition, clarity, and some actual courage not just “we’re not them.
Easier just to pretend that those with a different view are stupid, racist or wums though and they will all just vanish. We won't though. Clever lot.

Anyhow must stop moaning as we've never had it so good:-)

I do genuinely appreciate the reply and I hope you have a least seen where im at even if you don't agree.

Interesting times.
Comments like these don’t help the debate they just entrench division. That said, I get the frustration behind it.
Many people drawn to Reform/MAGA are, for want of a better term, people who feel left behind. They’re not usually politically engaged, and they gravitate toward messages that sound like common sense. That doesn’t mean they’re stupid or racist, it means no one’s earned their trust or spoken to their reality in a meaningful way.

But it’s also on them to engage in return. If you want to be taken seriously in political discussion, it has to go beyond shouting “stop the boats”. Forums like this work best when people are willing to explain their views, be challenged, and actually listen, no matter what party they're leaning toward.

Otherwise, we’re just shouting past each other and nothing changes.
 
You're right Labour members overwhelmingly backed PR, yet the leadership shelved it. Nothing to do with what’s right just what protects power. The irony is Labour would likely have been in government more often since 1980 under PR, thanks to consistent anti-Tory majorities across the left and centre.

IMO parties are more open to internal influence when they're in power. When governing, they need to keep MPs onside to pass legislation and avoid leadership challenges makes them more likely to bend to internal pressure. In opposition, it's all posturing and purity tests. The Tories have understood this for years, win the election first, then let the infighting commence. Grab power then argue about which flavour of Thatcherism to reheat. Ruthless, but effective

Immigration became a pressure valve the establishment ignored for too long, but let’s not pretend the conversation was one-sided. For decades, the UK debate was dominated by negative messaging, not silence.

The real issue wasn’t that no one talked about immigration it’s that the main parties failed to lead an honest conversation about why it happens, what levels are sustainable, and what the country needs. They dodged the hard questions and let the narrative drift and UKIP/Reform filled that vacuum with anger and simplicity.

Most people didn’t vote for Labour, they just wanted the Tories out. I was willing to give Starmer the benefit of the doubt, play it safe, don’t scare the media, get into No.10 and then deliver real change once inside. So far, it feels like we just swapped blue suits for red ties, with a bit more competence and a lot less culture war noise. That’s something, but it’s not transformation.

I’m with you, the left does need to get its act together. The problem is, Corbyn burned a lot of political capital, he led the left with all the tactical brilliance of a man trying to storm a castle armed with a spoon and a copy of The Morning Star, he made Boris look like Churchill in a hi-vis vest. We need ambition, clarity, and some actual courage not just “we’re not them.

Comments like these don’t help the debate they just entrench division. That said, I get the frustration behind it.
Many people drawn to Reform/MAGA are, for want of a better term, people who feel left behind. They’re not usually politically engaged, and they gravitate toward messages that sound like common sense. That doesn’t mean they’re stupid or racist, it means no one’s earned their trust or spoken to their reality in a meaningful way.

But it’s also on them to engage in return. If you want to be taken seriously in political discussion, it has to go beyond shouting “stop the boats”. Forums like this work best when people are willing to explain their views, be challenged, and actually listen, no matter what party they're leaning toward.

Otherwise, we’re just shouting past each other and nothing changes.

Good post mate.

I just wish everyone would vote green like me then we would all be happy ;-)
 
An elected politician may well be incompetent at managing the office to which they were elected, but the fact that he or she was elected in the first place is an indicator of competence (but not a guarantee as perhaps some lackey was installed with a rigged election, or some superfund backed an incompetent whose sole job was to not lose the election).

To wit, Trump is incompetent at running the Executive... but he's undeniably competent at winning election.
 
Last edited:
An elected politician may well be incompetent at managing the office to which they were elected, but the fact that he or she was elected in the first place is an indicator of competence (but not a guarantee as perhaps some lackey was installed with a rigged election, or some superfund backed an incompetent whose sole job was to not lose the election).

To wit, Trump is incompetent at running the Executive... but he's undeniably competent at winning election.
Trump may competent at winning an election but a UK politician winning a seat need not be competent at all. In most seats the colour of the rosette wins it not tte person wearing it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top