President Trump

The 1990s marked the peak of American influence, at least in China. People watched pirated American movies and listened to American music. Parents dreamed of their children studying hard, going to the America for education, finding a job, and eventually becoming Americans. All of this began to change slightly after an event in 1999.

By the time of 2001, on the morning after the 9/11 attacks, I was a high school student at the time, our principal gathered all the students on the playground and gave a brief speech, he said: "The 9/11 attacks are a tragedy in human history, but for our country, the America will shift its focus to the Middle East, China will gain a breathing space." History later proved his insight to be quite accurate. But at the time, I found such thinking somewhat shameful. After all, a tragedy is a tragedy, it shouldn’t be viewed as some kind of opportunity. That was a common sentiment among students back then, and it reflected how people’s perception of the US had not yet reached the same level of realism as it has today.

Chinese first began to sense a shift in the situation around 2008, when negative news coverage about China started to increase. However, on the whole, things weren’t drastically different from before. The real turning point came in 2018, when Trump imposed sanctions on Huawei. This was a landmark event, one that made the vast majority of Chinese realize that the America would never accept a competitive China. When China could only exchange 800 million shirts for a single Boeing 737, America was content to call China a friend. But the moment companies like Huawei emerged, everything changed.

I've never considered China a superpower. We are a third world developing country. Even if Chinese astronauts land on the moon five years from now, I wouldn’t even think there is a so called "space race." China’s lunar missions have nothing to do with America. We are simply a nation that remains unaccepted by the world, striving to carve out our own path to progress.
 
Trump hasn’t shred any MAGA support and won’t, ever. All the moaning about any issue is irrelevant. They would vote for him again and again even if he raped their children in front of them before they’d ever vote for a “Demonrat.”
I think there is some evidence in the recent polls that some Maga adherents have deserted. Most likely to not vote at all. But, you’re right, the vast majority are cult convinced.
 
The 1990s marked the peak of American influence, at least in China. People watched pirated American movies and listened to American music. Parents dreamed of their children studying hard, going to the America for education, finding a job, and eventually becoming Americans. All of this began to change slightly after an event in 1999.

By the time of 2001, on the morning after the 9/11 attacks, I was a high school student at the time, our principal gathered all the students on the playground and gave a brief speech, he said: "The 9/11 attacks are a tragedy in human history, but for our country, the America will shift its focus to the Middle East, China will gain a breathing space." History later proved his insight to be quite accurate. But at the time, I found such thinking somewhat shameful. After all, a tragedy is a tragedy, it shouldn’t be viewed as some kind of opportunity. That was a common sentiment among students back then, and it reflected how people’s perception of the US had not yet reached the same level of realism as it has today.

Chinese first began to sense a shift in the situation around 2008, when negative news coverage about China started to increase. However, on the whole, things weren’t drastically different from before. The real turning point came in 2018, when Trump imposed sanctions on Huawei. This was a landmark event, one that made the vast majority of Chinese realize that the America would never accept a competitive China. When China could only exchange 800 million shirts for a single Boeing 737, America was content to call China a friend. But the moment companies like Huawei emerged, everything changed.

I've never considered China a superpower. We are a third world developing country. Even if Chinese astronauts land on the moon five years from now, I wouldn’t even think there is a so called "space race." China’s lunar missions have nothing to do with America. We are simply a nation that remains unaccepted by the world, striving to carve out our own path to progress.
Oh poor you. The ‘Road’ policy would suggest otherwise on acceptance.
China’s big problem is its bonkers financial mess, led by the property market collapse.
 
Ever heard of King Leopold?

You mean Leopold II? I didnt adress it because it was not relevant in the slightest to my reply. I could make a long post here about the atroccities and the details of the story that is how Leopold II got his private colony, it is neither correct to fully assign to Belgium as what Leopold II let do in his private colony no'r to completely absolve us as a large part of his staff was Belgian, but certainly not exclusivly so.

This topic was never about Belgium anyway, the example served only to illustrate the experiences of another country and when and why it was regarded as "brave" by others.
In the end its a sort of knee jerk reaction of him to try to blacken Belgium's reputation in response to when he feels the US its reputation is blackened, and this when we didnt make the claims that Trump did and when my posts were reflecting on Trump's boasts by giving another perspective on the matter of "bravery". irregardless if Belgium wasnt always brave, it doesnt make Trumps boasts any more true right? You would think WT86 misunderstood the gist of my posts completely but i'm more of the impression that he's willingly using fallacious arguments as he seemingly wants to push the view that America were the saviours of WW2 aswell withought much nuance to it.
 
Last edited:
You mean Leopold II? I didnt adress it because it was not relevant in the slightest to my reply. I could make a long post here about the atroccities and the details of the story that is how Leopold II got his private colony, it is neither correct to fully pas blame to Belgium as what Leopold II did in his private colony no'r completely absolve us as a large part of his staff was Belgian, but certainly not exclusivly so.

his topic was never about Belgium anyway, the example served only to illustrate the experiences of another country and when and why it was regarded as "brave".
In the end its a sort of knee jerk reaction of him to try to blacken Belgium's reputation in response to when he feels the US its reputation is blackened, and this when we didnt make the claims that Trump did and when my posts were reflecting on Trump's boasts by giving another perspective on the matter of "bravery". irregardless if Belgium wasnt always brave, it doesnt make Trumps boasts any more true right? You would think WT86 misunderstood the gist of my posts completely but i'm more of the impression that he's willingly using fallacious arguments as he seemingly wants to push the view that America were the saviours of WW2 aswell withought much nuance to it.
WT 86 is largely wumming. My remark was meant to be directed at him. Sorry.
 
The interviewer missed a couple of tricks here.
Q. So you don’t remember taking an oath to uphold the constitution?
Q. So you will make war on a NATO ally?
both very obvious questions, but if asked would just result in further insane ramblings from a man who has lost any grip on reality he may have had and is now just reduced to ever more bizarre random executive orders to stay in the headlines. I mean ffs apparently the death of the american film industry is a national security issue???
 
I've never considered China a superpower. We are a third world developing country. Even if Chinese astronauts land on the moon five years from now, I wouldn’t even think there is a so called "space race." China’s lunar missions have nothing to do with America. We are simply a nation that remains unaccepted by the world, striving to carve out our own path to progress.

It would likely be easier for China to find acceptance in the west if its politics were different. As recent events has shown, we have reason to be weary of deepening ties with undemocratic regimes. I'm willing to treat China with far more nuance in respect to its own particular history compared to the more blatantly silly western-centered impressions of China, it is true that not all westeners sufficiently know China to have a non western-centered view of it and hence sometimes anti-China bias is just ridiculous. But matters like the Great firewall of China, the amount of hacking coming from China or China's various territorial claims are not to be ignored for their significance in geopolitics imho.
 
Last edited:
Oh poor you. The ‘Road’ policy would suggest otherwise on acceptance.
China’s big problem is its bonkers financial mess, led by the property market collapse.
But as an ordinary person, you barely feel the impact of the real estate crisis. Prices remain so low, with all goods in abundant supply. The quality of domestically produced products has improved significantly compared to before.

In the end, this crisis may simply become a crisis on paper—something you read about in the newspapers. Every day, people see headlines about how dire things are, yet countless goods continue to be produced and sold. People drive cheaper and better cars, pack every tourist destination during holidays, and life goes on as usual. Nothing has really changed. Of course, those who once splurged in European luxury boutiques might have gone bankrupt along the way. But who really cares?
 
This would be impossible to police.
I assume it is aimed at local councils/states/universities. If they declare a boycott, presumably Trumps goons go after the individuals who voted for it.
The problem is then the courts get involved as it illegal. He then withdraws funding from them, they go to court as that's illegal and the whole circus continues.
 
But as an ordinary person, you barely feel the impact of the real estate crisis. Prices remain so low, with all goods in abundant supply. The quality of domestically produced products has improved significantly compared to before.

In the end, this crisis may simply become a crisis on paper—something you read about in the newspapers. Every day, people see headlines about how dire things are, yet countless goods continue to be produced and sold. People drive cheaper and better cars, pack every tourist destination during holidays, and life goes on as usual. Nothing has really changed. Of course, those who once splurged in European luxury boutiques might have gone bankrupt along the way. But who really cares?
Interesting. What about those people who have paid for apartments that will never be built?
 
both very obvious questions, but if asked would just result in further insane ramblings from a man who has lost any grip on reality he may have had and is now just reduced to ever more bizarre random executive orders to stay in the headlines. I mean ffs apparently the death of the american film industry is a national security issue???
Further insane ramblings is just what we need. The more he demonstrates his madness, the more he is deserted. Roll on the mid terms. Dax will be the only one left.
 
This would be impossible to police.

I'm rather looking at it as people in Israel panicking over losing support in the US. I would think afterall this move is "AIPAC approved". Israëls existance and success has historically been very dependant on its ties with western powers, Israël doesnt mind to have a little bit of a pariah reputation as long as its backed by the global hegemon but it might loose either that backing or alternatively even having a hegemonic partner in the US, which could push Israël in a very isolated position in the future i would think.
 
Interesting. What about those people who have paid for apartments that will never be built?
The government has allocated substantial funds to complete those residential buildings. The number of people who have purchased apartments but cannot move in is actually very small. Rather than worrying about them, you should be more concerned about those who are eager to own new homes. Due to financial constraints on real estate developers, many original building plans have been put on hold. Yet there remains massive demand for housing upgrades—people still want newer and larger homes.
 
I'm rather looking at it as people in Israel panicking over losing support in the US. I would think afterall this move is "AIPAC approved". Israëls existance and success has historically been very dependant on its ties with western powers, Israël doesnt mind to have a little bit of a pariah reputation as long as its backed by the global hegemon but it might loose either that backing or alternatively even having a hegemonic partner in the US, which could push Israël in a very isolated position in the future i would think.
Yes. Israel’s popular support in the West is fast ebbing away. Netanyahu has a lot to answer for. I’m looking for the UK to change its stance officially but not with any great expectation. I just can’t accept with equanimity that we are supporting what is effectively genocide.
 
View attachment 155033

LOL.. well that's the new tariff on Netflix and Amazon Prime which will just end up in higher prices!

Hope it was worth it to you MAGA looking to say Whites only here, immigrants go home!
He's employed Mel Gibson, John Voight and Sylvester Stallone as "America's Movie Ambassadors" to go round the studio telling them to make movies in America
 
Do you remember the governor of Maine and her verbal spat with Trump at the White House? Trump threatened to withhold funding from Maine and the governor replied: “See you in court”
Well, last Friday she did meet the administration in court and………….she won.
 
It would likely be easier for China to find acceptance in the west if its politics were different. As recent events has shown, we have reason to be weary of deepening ties with undemocratic regimes. I'm willing to treat China with far more nuance in respect to its own particular history compared to the more blatantly silly western-centered impressions of China, it is true that not all westeners sufficiently know China to have a non western-centered view of it and hence sometimes anti-China bias is just ridiculous. But matters like the Great firewall of China, the amount of hacking coming from China or China's various territorial claims are not to be ignored for their significance in geopolitics imho.
The great firewall is an interesting topic. Yes it's a symbol of censorship often linked to authoritarianism. But it's also a protection of domestic internet industry. And not all contents are blocked out. Websites like CNN, skynews, and this forum of course are accessible. And it's quite easy to get a vpn. It's illegal, but 99.99% possibility the police won't do anything to you. It's a "gray zone", even to some extend tacitly approved by government.

It's inconvenient. But if you ask me it's good or not to keep it. I'd prefer to keep it. I don't have the confidence to shut it down. I mean look at the Americans they can't deal with all the shits on internet. Chinese people better than American people? I don't think so. Just keep the wall, have some kind of censorship is good.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top