ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 21,729
Maybe, but you have to pay “finished article” prices for them!None of these players are the finished article though. Haaland was purchased when he was 21 years old
Maybe, but you have to pay “finished article” prices for them!None of these players are the finished article though. Haaland was purchased when he was 21 years old
call me naive here but the costs would be the same or worse(they don't want to sell to bayern apparently) for munichAlways had my doubts once Musiala signed a new deal.
Heard nothing in recent weeks to say Wirtz was seriously coming here.
Suspect Wirtz was doing Leverkusen a favour maximising his price.
Don't believe for a second City haven't known the costs involved.
Spot on it takes two to tango Ultimately Erling doesn’t suit CityAgree with this. If the opposition don't want to play football there isn't much you can do about it. Each game we play I hope we get an early goal to prise the fuckers away from their own 18 yard box and then the game can become more open. Unfortunately this season the exact opposite usually occurs and it's them that's scored first and the very little ambition they had going forward to begin with has almost gone altogether.
It's like those saying we need to play to Haaland's strengths. His strengths are chasing balls in behind. Sides are fully aware of this now so they just sit deep and that alone pretty much neutralises this threat altogether. Often rendering Haaland a passenger for most of the game. He's poor in the air for his size and his touch generally isn't great in and around packed boxes. The only time Erling really becomes effective is in the rare games we've gone a couple ahead and the opposition are forced to throw caution to the wind and spaces open up for him. He'd be more effective in a counter-attacking side and not one that dominates possession, but the build up play is slow and ponderous.
Who is this Rudolph ?
Even if we don't get Wirtz, this shows we're actually ambitious enough to get back to where we were.
This is the standard of player that made us the best team in the world. Many of them have left in recent years. Few have arrived.
I think even if we had offered the money it wouldn’t have mattered. He probably always wanted to go to BayernI dont get why we had to walk to seemingly save face? Is it that bad that we went in big time with huge numbers and the player just chose someone else? Not that bad is it?
I think even if we had offered the money it wouldn’t have mattered. He probably always wanted to go to Bayern
Why are we actually all that arsed? We’ve been priced out of players before and moved on. The lad is good yes, but people here acting as if he’s the second coming of Christ.
There’s a number of good alternatives available for a much better price. If we can save a shed load to reinvest elsewhere then we should.
If he watched Saturday's shit show he'd have made up his mind fairly quickly. Not much attraction in City's style of play now is there. He was never coming here anyway, Pep knew, otherwise he'd have made it his business to be here to meet him.Think it’s fairly obvious that he was genuinely interested in joining us, right up to last week, but has now decided against it.
Obviously no idea as to the exact reasons. But I dare say that, were it the city of two years ago who were knocking on his door, as comfortably the best team in Europe, he’d have been all over us. Perhaps a reminder how quickly things can change and how costly it can be to take your eye off the ball. Disappointing but we move on. Hopefully the signings we make will mean no-one is too arsed about this come August.
Agree with your sentiment by the way, I just think there’s a dearth of available good talent.
It is......one player if they are at the top level, a load of average players fills a squad......with a load of average players ;)150 million on one player or 150 million on Reijnders,Cherki, a keeper and a full back. No brainer.
We walk away when the prospective player doesn't buy in. With us struggling to confirm playing in the CL and failing to score in our ĺast 2 matches, we aren't looking at our most enticing.I dont get why we had to walk to seemingly save face? Is it that bad that we went in big time with huge numbers and the player just chose someone else? Not that bad is it?
.....that 'dearth of talent' is why Wirtz is so hyped up, he's good but a million miles away from 'special'.
We walk away when the prospective player doesn't buy in. With us struggling to confirm playing in the CL and failing to score in our ĺast 2 matches, we aren't looking at our most enticing.
Hopefully we find a good alternative and he goes to BM not the dippers.
Who would you say is an actual good alternative that is available and as talented as wirtz? I don’t know actually any?
A "generational talent" I saw someone describe him as yesterday......that 'dearth of talent' is why Wirtz is so hyped up, he's good but a million miles away from 'special'.