Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.



"Let me tell you why the 115 case reminds me of Harold Shipman" is a real fucking opinion

Just seen this. This is sick to compare Shipmans trial to City's ffp.

What the fuck has happened to football journalists in this country. And how do the editors and the governing body allow this ?
 
Alex crooks described the Reijnders transfer fee at 55 million pounds euros. Obviously trying to make it sound more expensive as possible but sounded thick as fuck.
Danny Murphy then said he is a nice footballer but nothing more, nothing special but then go on to say how good and clever jadon sancho is.

The talk about our signing lasted 2 sentences then spent next 5 mins talking about Brentford buying Liverpools sub keeper.

It's mind boggling how they underestimate our players and do their best to find faults and that includes observations media have on pep. But then moan like mad when we sweep everything up and so how unfair it is.
 
Alex crooks described the Reijnders transfer fee at 55 million pounds euros. Obviously trying to make it sound more expensive as possible but sounded thick as fuck.
Danny Murphy then said he is a nice footballer but nothing more, nothing special but then go on to say how good and clever jadon sancho is.

The talk about our signing lasted 2 sentences then spent next 5 mins talking about Brentford buying Liverpools sub keeper.

It's mind boggling how they underestimate our players and do their best to find faults and that includes observations media have on pep. But then moan like mad when we sweep everything up and so how unfair it is.
You could easily swap De Bruyne's name for Reijnders' name in that article and it would be like going back 10 years - they never learn.
 
Alex crooks described the Reijnders transfer fee at 55 million pounds euros. Obviously trying to make it sound more expensive as possible but sounded thick as fuck.
Danny Murphy then said he is a nice footballer but nothing more, nothing special but then go on to say how good and clever jadon sancho is.

The talk about our signing lasted 2 sentences then spent next 5 mins talking about Brentford buying Liverpools sub keeper.

It's mind boggling how they underestimate our players and do their best to find faults and that includes observations media have on pep. But then moan like mad when we sweep everything up and so how unfair it is.
First story on Sky News is about the rags new signing, Fernandes! Then about them maybe signing the lad from Brentford, then dippers maybe signing Kerkez, then their reserve keeper going to Brentford, then City making an actual signing…

On the football channel we have: Premier League years 96/97, followed by 2 episodes of Neville interviewing, followed by “prem classics’, Rags v Dippers, followed by 2 x PL 100 clubs, featuring Fowler then Thierry Henry, then 2 x PL I cons, featuring Luiz Suarez, then Van Nistlerooy. After 2 super Sunday highlights, we move to something called ‘PL stories’, featuring Juan Mata, then a documentary about David James, a repeat of the Mata thing and, finally for today, another PL icons episode, featuring Cristiano Ronaldo…….
0030 tomorrow start with PL legends, Gary Neville!!

They don’t seem to realise there are 17 and a half other teams in the PL (Arsenal are the half team as, although they get a fair bit of coverage, compared to the other two, they don’t really.

I’d actually be amazed if anyone bothers with MUTV or LTV, if they’ve already got Sky….
 
Alex crooks described the Reijnders transfer fee at 55 million pounds euros. Obviously trying to make it sound more expensive as possible but sounded thick as fuck.
Danny Murphy then said he is a nice footballer but nothing more, nothing special but then go on to say how good and clever jadon sancho is.

The talk about our signing lasted 2 sentences then spent next 5 mins talking about Brentford buying Liverpools sub keeper.

It's mind boggling how they underestimate our players and do their best to find faults and that includes observations media have on pep. But then moan like mad when we sweep everything up and so how unfair it is.
They can’t use the “we don’t like or respect oil clubs” narrative anymore after waxing lyrically about the Newcastle and PSG cup wins. We get the treatment because we are the biggest rivals to their two cash cows
 
Last edited:
BBC have opened the comments section for the Reijnders transfer.

First post: "What about the 115?"

Absolutely living rent free in other fans head
Yeah, i love the legal and finance experts on there who always have something to say about city.

There’s more brains in a Frey Bentos pie
 
Just seen this. This is sick to compare Shipmans trial to City's ffp.

What the fuck has happened to football journalists in this country. And how do the editors and the governing body allow this ?
Especially sick when you take into account the location of where Shipman’s murders took place and how many city fans live around that area.
I’m originally from that area and my aunts friend was one of his victims, a lot of people from the area have links to the victims.

Imagine being a city fan reading that and being related to one of shipman’s victims.

He’s a rancid, despicable ****.
 
Just seen this. This is sick to compare Shipmans trial to City's ffp.

What the fuck has happened to football journalists in this country. And how do the editors and the governing body allow this ?

It'll be another "opinion" piece based on nothing by a know nothing.
 
Especially sick when you take into account the location of where Shipman’s murders took place and how many city fans live around that area.
I’m originally from that area and my aunts friend was one of his victims, a lot of people from the area have links to the victims.

Imagine being a city fan reading that and being related to one of shipman’s victims.

He’s a rancid, despicable ****.
Inconceivable the **** would have drawn an analogy with a Merseyside murder trial when talking about Liverpool.

Imagine him drawing comparisons with Thomas Cashman’s trial when writing about Liverpool, and yet it’s fair game when bringing England’s most prolific serial killer into the equation because it’s City.

It actually reveals so much that he didn’t stop to pause and think about the geographical sensitivity of the wholly gratuitous and incongruous analogy that he elected to deploy.

It didn’t even add 1% to the (unbelievably shit) points he was floundering about to try and make in his equally unbelievably wank article.
 
First story on Sky News is about the rags new signing, Fernandes! Then about them maybe signing the lad from Brentford, then dippers maybe signing Kerkez, then their reserve keeper going to Brentford, then City making an actual signing…

On the football channel we have: Premier League years 96/97, followed by 2 episodes of Neville interviewing, followed by “prem classics’, Rags v Dippers, followed by 2 x PL 100 clubs, featuring Fowler then Thierry Henry, then 2 x PL I cons, featuring Luiz Suarez, then Van Nistlerooy. After 2 super Sunday highlights, we move to something called ‘PL stories’, featuring Juan Mata, then a documentary about David James, a repeat of the Mata thing and, finally for today, another PL icons episode, featuring Cristiano Ronaldo…….
0030 tomorrow start with PL legends, Gary Neville!!

They don’t seem to realise there are 17 and a half other teams in the PL (Arsenal are the half team as, although they get a fair bit of coverage, compared to the other two, they don’t really.

I’d actually be amazed if anyone bothers with MUTV or LTV, if they’ve already got Sky….

PL legends, Gary Neville!!……seems every rag is a fukin legend…..according to rag pundits/media
 
Started my list with people at work, but surprisingly non of them are Scum or dipper fans with the biggest bullshit opinions ?

Inconceivable the **** would have drawn an analogy with a Merseyside murder trial when talking about Liverpool.

Imagine him drawing comparisons with Thomas Cashman’s trial when writing about Liverpool, and yet it’s fair game when bringing England’s most prolific serial killer into the equation because it’s City.

It actually reveals so much that he didn’t stop to pause and think about the geographical sensitivity of the wholly gratuitous and incongruous analogy that he elected to deploy.

It didn’t even add 1% to the (unbelievably shit) points he was floundering about to try and make in his equally unbelievably wank article.

He did think about the geographical sensitivity, it wasn’t a coincidence. He knows the Dippers sing about Shipman without any criticism at our games & that was exactly why he said it.

The grubby ****?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top