President Trump

I literally saw one post on twitter the other day ( who claimed to be a Dr ) that the Sun doesn't cause skin cancer, Sun block does.
Dear Points of View:

"why, oh why, did the one time that MAGA didn't follow Trump's lead have to be when he suggested that taking disinfectant could fend off COVID?"
- Incredulous of Hampshire
 
Last edited:
Ooooh he's the current potus
he wears a maga hat
which was made in China
now whaddya make of that?

Oooooh, he's the current potus
he wears a maga hat
he's a mate of Putin
now whaddya make of that?
.
Ooooooh he's the current potus.
he wears a maga hat
he's full of lies and bullsh"t
now whaddya think of that?

To the tune of My old man's a dustman.

(please feel free to add verses/amend as you see fit.....)
 
Ooooooh he's the current potus.
he wears a maga hat
he's got a button mushroom
now Stormy Daniels confirmed that?
 
I dont even watch his stuff anymore I’m passed it all, the guy is a **** and the usa deserves everything it’s getting for voting him in, I’ve zero sympathy, 230 million could have stopped this but didn’t.
I also don't have sympathy for those who voted for him, but I have plenty for those in Ukraine and the Middle East suffering as a result of their vote
 
"Chemtrails"?

Now there's concern about contrails contributing to global warming (so better if they could be avoided, technically or by changing altitude or route) but then MAGA don't believe in man-made global warming.

Yeah…no!

I’d love to know the science behind measuring something that often doesn’t exist.

Ever looked up in the sky and noticed not all aircraft leave a contrail?

IMG_1426.jpeg

This shows how it’s virtually impossible to “plan” where this might occur, and, requires specific humidity and temperature to occur.

How do you model that in a highly dynamic air mass that is supposedly being warmed by human actions on the ground and naturally occurring changes in the atmosphere?

IMG_1427.jpeg
In a world where the atmosphere is supposedly heating up, doesn’t the heat LOWER the propensity for contrails, as shown above?

If aircraft fly in the “contrail zone” and temperatures are getting warmer through other human actions, surely the warmer air is creating LESS contrails, no?

IMG_1428.jpeg

And, isn’t it amazing how the EXACT SAME CONTRAIL is shown above as reflecting less solar energy back into the universe while acting as a “blanket” on outgoing energy.

Also, note the “External Factors” and realize that a significant portion of all long haul flights (they always seem to show 4 engines jets that are becoming obsolete, but…) are now not only flown using the most advanced, high bypass (ZERO EMISSIONS from the bypass!) TWO ENGINED turbojets that fly at night.

In short, it’s not only hard to measure, in such a dynamic “laboratory,” but engines are not only being reduced in number, but increased dramatically in efficiency by not only creating significantly more thrust from high bypass effects, but lighter aircraft and not using engine air for things like air conditioning on aircraft, which used to “steal” part of the thrust to not only pressurize the cabin, but keep it at the prescribed temperature. That efficiency is from using electricity instead of engine air.

And, I won’t even go into the biofuel question, as I’m not even sure it has any effect on contrails, per se, but rather the gases that are released into the atmosphere.

Lastly, when I said “Yes” to “Chemtrails,” it was correct, but an absurdity. ANY substance is made up of a chemical composition, thus ANYTHING we see coming from ANY object is, by definition, a trail of chemicals…a chemtrail…even if it is only water vapor made up of hydrogen and oxygen!
 
I have this vision of the phone call being Trump acting like Tony Soprono until Putin made him change his nappy at least twice.
I have a vision of there being no such phone call at all and it all being bullshit again. Just Trump making noise to try and remain legitimate while knowing he is a compromised asset
 
I have a vision of there being no such phone call at all and it all being bullshit again. Just Trump making noise to try and remain legitimate while knowing he is a compromised asset
According to State propagandist RT Putin has only spoken to The Pope today.
 
Yeah…no!

I’d love to know the science behind measuring something that often doesn’t exist.

Ever looked up in the sky and noticed not all aircraft leave a contrail?

View attachment 158967

This shows how it’s virtually impossible to “plan” where this might occur, and, requires specific humidity and temperature to occur.

How do you model that in a highly dynamic air mass that is supposedly being warmed by human actions on the ground and naturally occurring changes in the atmosphere?

View attachment 158968
In a world where the atmosphere is supposedly heating up, doesn’t the heat LOWER the propensity for contrails, as shown above?

If aircraft fly in the “contrail zone” and temperatures are getting warmer through other human actions, surely the warmer air is creating LESS contrails, no?

View attachment 158969

And, isn’t it amazing how the EXACT SAME CONTRAIL is shown above as reflecting less solar energy back into the universe while acting as a “blanket” on outgoing energy.

Also, note the “External Factors” and realize that a significant portion of all long haul flights (they always seem to show 4 engines jets that are becoming obsolete, but…) are now not only flown using the most advanced, high bypass (ZERO EMISSIONS from the bypass!) TWO ENGINED turbojets that fly at night.

In short, it’s not only hard to measure, in such a dynamic “laboratory,” but engines are not only being reduced in number, but increased dramatically in efficiency by not only creating significantly more thrust from high bypass effects, but lighter aircraft and not using engine air for things like air conditioning on aircraft, which used to “steal” part of the thrust to not only pressurize the cabin, but keep it at the prescribed temperature. That efficiency is from using electricity instead of engine air.

And, I won’t even go into the biofuel question, as I’m not even sure it has any effect on contrails, per se, but rather the gases that are released into the atmosphere.

Lastly, when I said “Yes” to “Chemtrails,” it was correct, but an absurdity. ANY substance is made up of a chemical composition, thus ANYTHING we see coming from ANY object is, by definition, a trail of chemicals…a chemtrail…even if it is only water vapor made up of hydrogen and oxygen!
Sorry, I only accept information on contrails from ourgovernemntisgassingus.com, not experienced airline pilots.

Doesn't everyone?
 
Yeah…no!

I’d love to know the science behind measuring something that often doesn’t exist.

Ever looked up in the sky and noticed not all aircraft leave a contrail?

View attachment 158967

This shows how it’s virtually impossible to “plan” where this might occur, and, requires specific humidity and temperature to occur.

How do you model that in a highly dynamic air mass that is supposedly being warmed by human actions on the ground and naturally occurring changes in the atmosphere?

View attachment 158968
In a world where the atmosphere is supposedly heating up, doesn’t the heat LOWER the propensity for contrails, as shown above?

If aircraft fly in the “contrail zone” and temperatures are getting warmer through other human actions, surely the warmer air is creating LESS contrails, no?

View attachment 158969

And, isn’t it amazing how the EXACT SAME CONTRAIL is shown above as reflecting less solar energy back into the universe while acting as a “blanket” on outgoing energy.

Also, note the “External Factors” and realize that a significant portion of all long haul flights (they always seem to show 4 engines jets that are becoming obsolete, but…) are now not only flown using the most advanced, high bypass (ZERO EMISSIONS from the bypass!) TWO ENGINED turbojets that fly at night.

In short, it’s not only hard to measure, in such a dynamic “laboratory,” but engines are not only being reduced in number, but increased dramatically in efficiency by not only creating significantly more thrust from high bypass effects, but lighter aircraft and not using engine air for things like air conditioning on aircraft, which used to “steal” part of the thrust to not only pressurize the cabin, but keep it at the prescribed temperature. That efficiency is from using electricity instead of engine air.

And, I won’t even go into the biofuel question, as I’m not even sure it has any effect on contrails, per se, but rather the gases that are released into the atmosphere.

Lastly, when I said “Yes” to “Chemtrails,” it was correct, but an absurdity. ANY substance is made up of a chemical composition, thus ANYTHING we see coming from ANY object is, by definition, a trail of chemicals…a chemtrail…even if it is only water vapor made up of hydrogen and oxygen!
I'll have to see if I can find the slides from the presentation I saw - part of a general look at how aviation can reduce its environmental impact (even while the industry expands). But the top diagram is surely just a range of outcomes; it doesn't assess how likely each scenario is, so if science can better predict the conditions that create contrails then outcome 1 becomes easier to achieve. Re your last bit, there would be a "chemtrail" from the engines even if you couldn't see a contrail. (Apparently some see a plane making a contrail then hit the place on the curve where it doesn't and think the pilot has switched off the engines...)
 
Had a conversation with the dictator Putin that lasted over an hr. What was said. More than he summed up in three or four sentences that's for sure.

Also his travel ban excludes Egypt, the country when the perpatrator of the latest terrorist attack on US soil comes from, even tho he referenced the Collorado attack in his speech. That's logic for you.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top