City 2nd behind United on most followed English teams online

In the premier league era the scouse cunts have a grand total of two titles in 34yrs, they should be a total irrelevance to young modern day fans, but the media portraying them as “ good old Liverpool” who don’t spend money like oil rich city have brainwashed youngsters
It also helps them that some of their (let’s say problematic) past has been airbrushed from history; like how much the Moores spent on buying them a few trophies.
 
From MSN News:

16 Most Followed Football Clubs in England Ranked in New Study​


Surprisingly, Manchester City are one place above Liverpool, with 179.5m social media followers. Pep Guardiola's side became one of the most dominant teams in the history of English football following the former Barcelona manager's arrival and that form has seen them become one of the most followed teams in the country. They've got a long way to go before they catch up to their local rivals, though. Manchester United, despite all their struggles lately, are by far the most followed team in England, with 233.6m social media followers.
And 90% of that is the 115 thread!
 
We all know that the sheikh has a room full of family members and friends each armed with several computers and they spend all day hammering away to get those numbers up.
If they didn’t, we would only have 37 followers and they have all been bought with dirty oil money.
Everyone knows this.
 
It is 'surprising ' considering that practically every Rag and Dipper game is televised. Then Arse on screen and we appear to be way down the picking order for TV showings. (I'm talking Sly and TNT here).

So well done our Blue Boyz considering the obstacles in our way.

Stat can't be correct though. I mean arent the Dips the biggest, bestest, most supported club in derr werrrld, why ders over a million at dem der trophy parades la.....and City get 100!!!!
Rags and Dippers had just as many televised games as us last season (25). Arsenal were 1st with 28 and Spurs 2nd with 26.

 
Just pure jealousy and wankers being very disingenuous. It's the way it'll be for a good while yet. We know the truth and that's all I'm bothered about.
Like all this sarcasm regarding Napoli and KDB finally joining a big club , a one club city of almost a million people who average 3K less than us for home games
 
The first word, 'suprisingly'.
Why is anyone suprised that we have more followers than the dippers?

If the media didn't continually spout shite about them they wouldn't even be third.
Sorry by the law of the land( bluemoon)I can only give you one like.
 
Rags and Dippers had just as many televised games as us last season (25). Arsenal were 1st with 28 and Spurs 2nd with 26.

Thanks. Surprises me, particularly re Dips.

What is the attraction with Arse for TV.

I am somewhat puzzled as I thought all clubs had to have same number televised?
 
From MSN News:

16 Most Followed Football Clubs in England Ranked in New Study​


Surprisingly, Manchester City are one place above Liverpool, with 179.5m social media followers. Pep Guardiola's side became one of the most dominant teams in the history of English football following the former Barcelona manager's arrival and that form has seen them become one of the most followed teams in the country. They've got a long way to go before they catch up to their local rivals, though. Manchester United, despite all their struggles lately, are by far the most followed team in England, with 233.6m social media followers.
Shows the power of the media and culture. ManU has been mediocre for going on 15 years now yet the most popular English team.
 
Thanks. Surprises me, particularly re Dips.

What is the attraction with Arse for TV.

I am somewhat puzzled as I thought all clubs had to have same number televised?
You can't have been under the impression teams in the bottom 3 were shown as much as teams in the top 3? Even less would subscribe than already do. I remember when we were "shit" we were hardy ever on and even when we were it was only to see us get a good hiding from the then "big four".
 
You can't have been under the impression teams in the bottom 3 were shown as much as teams in the top 3? Even less would subscribe than already do. I remember when we were "shit" we were hardy ever on and even when we were it was only to see us get a good hiding from the then "big four".
I'm obviously thick then, because I did think everyone was shown same amount of times..... I wasn't watching as much nineties/ early noughties as bringing up my little folk so not a lot of time for footy.
 
Unfortunately, even after 13 shit seasons of barely wining any trophies of note, the Rags are still the most followed English team online. It's going to take decades of not winning trophies, and the majority of their Fergie era fans dying before the Rags support might start falling in earnest across the UK and around the World.
 
You can't have been under the impression teams in the bottom 3 were shown as much as teams in the top 3? Even less would subscribe than already do. I remember when we were "shit" we were hardy ever on and even when we were it was only to see us get a good hiding from the then "big four".

City were always the last match on MOTD when City were shit. The Fergie era Rags were always the first match on MOTD,
 
City were always the last match on MOTD when City were shit. The Fergie era Rags were always the first match on MOTD,
It's not changed now we are good and Rags are shytee last time I bothered to watch MOTD... SALford BbC Rag infested fanboyz sports department sort out the running order.
 
Unfortunately, even after 13 shit seasons of barely wining any trophies of note, the Rags are still the most followed English team online. It's going to take decades of not winning trophies, and the majority of their Fergie era fans dying before the Rags support might start falling in earnest across the UK and around the World.

Just 1 more decade will do it ;)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top