You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet the £250m return
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
Unrelated and not my figure - see the pic.5 times 25m a year is
Will we ever have what I would call 4 traditional or proper fullbacks ? We have Anti Nouri will surely get a right back but no chance of back up fullbacks. Why ? Will it happen eventually ? Perhaps when older midfielders or CB move on ?
G
G
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Guest
Maybe 3, squad size being what it is.Will we ever have what I would call 4 traditional or proper fullbacks ? We have Anti Nouri will surely get a right back but no chance of back up fullbacks. Why ? Will it happen eventually ? Perhaps when older midfielders or CB move on ?
Blue_Lightsaber
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2022
- Messages
- 4,468
- Team supported
- Man City
It will lead to longer contracts to effectively increase the salary multiplier....do the Chavs know something we don't with all their new recruits on long contracts?????
They definitely know something about salary structure since even Palmer is not on much.
Jack Grealish makes almost triple what Palmer does and is much harder to move despite only having a year left.
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
How is this any different to the Webster rule, article 17 of Fifa transfer regulations?KSA and other non-EU countries will have a field day with this one
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
After Pep is the most probable as he is the master of having players who are capable of playing different positionsWill we ever have what I would call 4 traditional or proper fullbacks ? We have Anti Nouri will surely get a right back but no chance of back up fullbacks. Why ? Will it happen eventually ? Perhaps when older midfielders or CB move on ?
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
Thats great if you want to shift players on but if you want to keep your star players then you are screwed especially if you aren't one of the entitled clubs.They definitely know something about salary structure since even Palmer is not on much.
Jack Grealish makes almost triple what Palmer does and is much harder to move despite only having a year left.
Brentford want £70m for Mbueno but I believe he's on 45k a week so a compensation package for 2 years would be around £5m
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 17,946
Doesn't the Webster ruling only apply if the club haven't played the player in a certain number of games in a season i.e. out of favour, whereas this would impact players who were first choice every week?How is this any different to the Webster rule, article 17 of Fifa transfer regulations?
Thats great if you want to shift players on but if you want to keep your star players then you are screwed especially if you aren't one of the entitled clubs.
Brentford want £70m for Mbueno but I believe he's on 45k a week so a compensation package for 2 years would be around £5m
Sounds like another way to just entrench the biggest teams at the top. Although I include us in that, the biggest beneficiaries would be the failing 'big' clubs, such as Spurs and united.
It makes sense if they did. At first, it appeared that they were handing out long contracts to spread out the amortisation expenses; UEFA then capped that at 5 years, but they continued to hand out these extra long contracts, and we have subsequently done the same with Haaland for no apparent reason. There appears to be something afoot.It will lead to longer contracts to effectively increase the salary multiplier....do the Chavs know something we don't with all their new recruits on long contracts?????
If it is implemented, a wage cap must accompany it. Instead of capping wages at 70% of each individual club's revenue, I'd prefer to see them capped at 70% of the league's average revenue per club, or 70% of your own revenue, whichever is lower.Sounds like another way to just entrench the biggest teams at the top. Although I include us in that, the biggest beneficiaries would be the failing 'big' clubs, such as Spurs and united.
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
In a nutshellSounds like another way to just entrench the biggest teams at the top. Although I include us in that, the biggest beneficiaries would be the failing 'big' clubs, such as Spurs and united.
BlueDejong
Well-Known Member
citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
Shock fucking horror lol
citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
I'd tell Napoli to get fucked anyway. The Jorginho fiasco still pisses me off their owner is a c@@tNo team would. Gonna end up as a loan where we pay half the wages
Pubteam Lomas
Well-Known Member
I would generally but if they gonna give £££££££s then we got make an exception!I'd tell Napoli to get fucked anyway. The Jorginho fiasco still pisses me off their owner is a c@@t
mscenterh750
Well-Known Member
Inflated transfer fee of £50 odd million quid for big Erl. You couldn’t fucking make it up…………..oh wait.Wow - that state of this
View attachment 160226
Yeah but you're ignoring the £200m we also paid Haaland and his Dad "off the books" according to "JFT97Slottsarmy" on Twitter.Inflated transfer fee of £50 odd million quid for big Erl. You couldn’t fucking make it up…………..oh wait.