The BBC | Tim Davie resigns as Director General over Trump documentary edit (p 187)

It's incitement to violence and is likely to stoke antisemitism. I have friends, children of friends and relatives serving in the IDF. I may not agree with what they're doing in Gaza and I suspect many members of the IDF aren't comfortable with it and don't want to be a part of it.

Imagine if he'd called for death to MPs, or Catholics, or any other group. It's no different.

In trying to be all things to all people, the BBC is being nothing to anyone and pissing off everyone. Just shut it down FFS.
Sorry, but if only 1 person in the IDF is killing all those people, then every single one is complicit. It seems that killing innocents is a legal order in Israel, and nobody questions it. In fact, from what I’ve seen, they fucking love doing it.

And, yes, I agree with you that what came out at Glastonbury was disgusting and needs to be dealt with, but what the Israeli government and those that support these actions are doing, calls for condemnation from the whole world.

Nobody, but nobody, wants to see the pictures we’ve seen, but this is reality and what Israel is doing to innocent people.

Absolutely sick bastards, and shitbags to boot.
 
Sorry, but if only 1 person in the IDF is killing all those people, then every single one is complicit. It seems that killing innocents is a legal order in Israel, and nobody questions it. In fact, from what I’ve seen, they fucking love doing it.

And, yes, I agree with you that what came out at Glastonbury was disgusting and needs to be dealt with, but what the Israeli government and those that support these actions are doing, calls for condemnation from the whole world.

Nobody, but nobody, wants to see the pictures we’ve seen, but this is reality and what Israel is doing to innocent people.

Absolutely sick bastards, and shitbags to boot.
So does that mean that if an Islamic terrorist kills someone, all Muslims are complicit? Or were all Irish Catholics complicit in murders committed by the IRA? I don't think you've thought this through.
 
UK police investigate Kneecap, Bob Vylan performances
https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/2025/0630/1521049-bob-vylan-glastonbury/

Seems to me that it’s an Israeli tool. Note how it says Anti-Semitic, not Anti-Zionist or Anti-Israel.
What's to "investigate" FFS? No wonder their productivity and clear up rates are dismal.

Just watch the BBC vide for 2 minutes!

What they should have said is "We have investigated, found that a crime has even committed and are commencing a criminal prosecution". It's not exactly Hercule Poirot material is it.

In practice, we know EXACTLY what is going on. The Chief Constable has said, "Hang on lads, I need to run this by Starmer to see what he wants to do. Just put out a holding statement, saying we're investigating".
 
Last edited:
So does that mean that if an Islamic terrorist kills someone, all Muslims are complicit? Or were all Irish Catholics complicit in murders committed by the IRA? I don't think you've thought this through.
Where did I mention religion?

As always, people take a post out of context and skew opinion to their own narrative.

In my opinion, this has nothing to do with religion, all to do with space to further the population. And the means that it has been done by, killing innocents for the land grab.

I’m sure you do not agree with what Israel are doing in Gaza, so please don’t turn this into some form of religious hatred.
 
So does that mean that if an Islamic terrorist kills someone, all Muslims are complicit? Or were all Irish Catholics complicit in murders committed by the IRA? I don't think you've thought this through.
If someone said death to the Nazi’s would you be arsed? No, me neither. Same thing going on in Gaza through the IDF.

Worst thing about this is right wing wankers like the daily mail are making this headline news. Rather than the constant murdering and oppression that’s happening daily in Gaza.
 
So does that mean that if an Islamic terrorist kills someone, all Muslims are complicit? Or were all Irish Catholics complicit in murders committed by the IRA? I don't think you've thought this through.
If someone had said by the IRA not all Irish Catholics your point might make sense. Just like whats his name said the IDF. Not all Israeli’s like the daily mail plastered across its front page
 
I may not agree with what they're doing in Gaza and I suspect many members of the IDF aren't comfortable with it and don't want to be a part of it.

I'm not entirely comfortable with some of the past and present actions of the IDF too. Here are some of them that I've read about:

‘We go to the Barbir Hospital…Robert [Fisk] has known Dr Amal Shamma since the Israeli invasion, when she showed him babies killed by Israeli phosphorus shells whose bodies burst into flames each time they were taken out of water.’

'There were babies - blackened babies because they had been slaughtered more than 24-hours earlier & their small bodies were already in a state of decomposition - tossed into rubbish heaps alongside discarded....Israeli army equipment & empty bottles of whiskey.'

'There were women lying in houses with their skirts torn up to their waists and their legs wide apart, children with their throats cut, rows of young men shot in the back after being lined up at an execution wall....'

The previous two quotations were taken from Robert Fisk’s eyewitness account of the Sabra and Chatila massacre, an atrocity that was perpetrated by Christian Phalangists but orchestrated by the IDF and former Israeli PM Ariel Sharon in particular.

From Lara Marlowe (the source of my first quotation), one additionally learns that the Phalangists were flown in from the south in Israeli Hercules transport aircraft. They were given weapons, uniforms and US military rations. Then they were sent into the Palestinian camps to perpetrate the slaughter. The Israelis remained in contact while the massacre happened, watching with field glasses and dropping flares from fighter aircraft overnight so the Phalange could see what they were doing.

Now here’s Robert Fisk (again), this time on the Qana massacre: ‘Not since Sabra and Chatila had I seen the innocent slaughtered like this. The Lebanese refugee women and children and men lay in heaps, their hands or arms or legs missing, beheaded or disembowelled.’More on the Qana massacre (a very graphic description) can be found here:


From Tareq Baconi's study Hamas Contained, one additionally learns that 634 Palestinian children were killed by the IDF between the year 2000 & Operation Cast Lead in 2008/9, while 551 died as a result of Operation Protective Edge in 2014.

And according to the Israeli historian Ilan Pappe, Israel’s retribution for October 7th (Operation Swords of Iron) ‘has killed over 30,000 Palestinians so far; roughly a third were children.’ His book was published in October 2024, so more will have died since then.

But I also find the actions of Hamas (and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades) utterly reprehensible and barbaric too. Here's a Hamas leader that was quoted in a Human Rights Watch report:

‘Our stand is not to target children, the elderly, or places of prayer-even though these places of prayer incite the killing of Muslims. Up until now we have not targeted schools.., nor do we target hospitals, even though they are an easy target. That is because we are working in accordance with certain values … we don’t fight Jews because they are Jewish but because they occupy our lands. So if children are killed it is something outside of our hands.‘

These claims are false. Prior to October 7th 2023, Hamas deliberately chose targets for suicide bombings where children were present. Examples include the Sbarro restaurant bombing (2001), the Matza restaurant suicide bombing and Kiryat Menachem bus bombing (2002), the Haifa Bus 37 Suicide Bombing and the Shmuel HaNavi bus bombing (2003), and the Beersheeba Bus Bombings of 2004.

The hypocrisy of Hamas in seeking to provide Islamic justifications for their actions is further explored by Amy Chiang in this excellent article:


Set against the above backdrop, I therefore find Bob Vylan's cheerleading for the above kind of violence offensive and share your concerns about incitement.

When it comes to this intractable conflict, I have no idea how it can be resolved. Maybe reading Shlomo Ben Ami's Scars of War, Wounds of Peace: The Israeli-Arab Tragedy will give me some ideas about that.

So for the moment, I'm on the side of the innocent civilians on all sides who have suffered and died as a result of it.
 
What's to "investigate" FFS? No wonder their productivity and clear up rates are dismal.

Just watch the BBC vide for 2 minutes!

What they should have said is "We have investigated, found that a crime has even committed and are commencing a criminal prosecution". It's not exactly Hercule Poirot material is it.

In practice, we know EXACTLY what is going on. The Chief Constable has said, "Hang on lads, I need to run this by Starmer to see what he wants to do. Just put out a holding statement, saying we're investigating".
What crime has been committed? The chant was crass but was it criminal?
 
What crime has been committed? The chant was crass but was it criminal?
Crass??? It was fucking outrageous. (And I'm very critical of Israel's ongoing war crimes).

But illegal? Probably, yes. Either incitement to violence, and/or hate speech, both of which are illegal.
 
First the damage inflicted on the RAF plane, and now the death chants.
Two-tier? How odd.

If anything I'd say that was consistent. Both are protests against genocide.

The first is almost certainly an offence, now that juries have been refused the "preventing greater harm" defence, but the law is daft to treat "serious criminal damage" as "terrorism" (if certain conditions are fulfilled), so a jury will likely look closely at the wording of the law.

The second may not even even get to court. What is actually wrong with a bit of hate toward an army that targets children? Unless you make the leap to its being "vile Jew hatred" to hate people who are killing children.

(What have you done to try and stop the genocide?)

Anyway, for this thread let's all watch Channel 4 this evening to see whether the BBC is two-tier about its reporting (or not reporting) on what the IDF does.
 
Last edited:
We don't need an adjective to describe the kind of tool the BBC is - they are just a tool, plain and simple.

They can’t win as always, cut them off and they deny free speech, show them and they are promoting hate speech.
The BBC is by far the best service out there, not just TV but News, Radio, Sport, World service - my kids watching CBeebies right now, very much under appreciated.
 
They can’t win as always, cut them off and they deny free speech, show them and they are promoting hate speech.
The BBC is by far the best service out there, not just TV but News, Radio, Sport, World service - my kids watching CBeebies right now, very much under appreciated.
The shambles broadcasting from Glastonbury at the weekend can not be described as the best out there unless every other broadcaster is on a par with the very worst of North Korean TV.
 
The shambles broadcasting from Glastonbury at the weekend can not be described as the best out there unless every other broadcaster is on a par with the very worst of North Korean TV.

All because they didn't cut off Dylan ? in which they'd be outraged complaints saying they are silencing the truth and not giving free speech ?

Aside from that they filmed the stages brilliantly, i was hopping between channels and on red button and caught with alot of the acts from BBC website, the production was perfect.
 
Last edited:
Can someone explain how Bob Vylan’s outburst was antisemitic?

It was directed at the IDF not Jews as a race. And as far as I am aware, that force includes Druze, Bedouin Arab, Christian Arab, and non-Bedouin Muslim Arab recruits.

The only thing I can think of is that saying ‘Death to the IDF’ might be construed as potentially provoking an animus against Jews in general, but am happy to be corrected on this and what I have posted here.
It wasn't. But there are several on here that are as thick as pig mince.
 
It's incitement to violence and is likely to stoke antisemitism. I have friends, children of friends and relatives serving in the IDF. I may not agree with what they're doing in Gaza and I suspect many members of the IDF aren't comfortable with it and don't want to be a part of it.

Imagine if he'd called for death to MPs, or Catholics, or any other group. It's no different.

In trying to be all things to all people, the BBC is being nothing to anyone and pissing off everyone. Just shut it down FFS.
If they didn't want to be a part of it, then they wouldn't be a part of it. If somebody ordered me to kill a child waiting for food, I'd tell them to fuck off.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top