righty oh,I think @slbsn has got his forensic hat on and has posed an unanswerable question with razor sharp logic. I agree, PB has a world exclusive.
Is there any chance I can have the slbsn shirt in blue please :)
nope.Just read the last page and not the previous couple of weeks posts as the thread became a joke. Can someone update me where we’re up to?
hereJust read the last page and not the previous couple of weeks posts as the thread became a joke. Can someone update me where we’re up to?
I’m not sure you should read too much into the story about the PL putting the feelers out for a new senior position.Stefan doesn't have a story, he just thinks all options are still open and some a little more likely than others. PB's info chimes more with common sense. The headhunter story was openly reported although not specifying which senior PL position was being recruited. It defies belief that the panel's ruling is not also known by the parties after a period of 8 months since the hearing was completed last year. The delay in making the outcome public is clearly for a reason and the most likely is the account given by PB. Agree that the reasons for Stefan spinning out both possibilities are also pretty clear.
You misunderstood my point. What I am saying is that in these sort of cases it is not unusual for political influence on all sides to play a role. The official release could be delayed for numerous reasons. I don’t know what motivation the PL had for bringing this case in the first place. But you can’t rule out old-fashioned malice, corruption, and politics like we have seen in cases like the Post Office scandal.That isn't what he said but the idea that the PL go to all the trouble of a huge trial and formal serious allegations over 12 weeks with hundreds of lawyers and millions of pounds and then want to get all careful about being political is not very unlikely unless you believe that the Panel have absolutely thrown the book at City. And even then I can't see it and nor would that fit with PB's suggestion that the PL want the delay. So, in fact, this is not the way the world works.
We've only got Plato's word he said anything at all, slippery character that Plato.righty oh,
unanswerable questions time.
i cannot help myself now...
socrates (not the footy player) said,
"the only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
he also said,
"i know that i know nothing."
clearly he didn't say them in english.
you think the thread is a joke.Just read the last page and not the previous couple of weeks posts as the thread became a joke. Can someone update me where we’re up to?
Ah, Socrates was echoed by Manuel in Fawlty Towers who said: “I know nothing”righty oh,
unanswerable questions time.
i cannot help myself now...
socrates (not the footy player) said,
"the only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
he also said,
"i know that i know nothing."
clearly he didn't say them in english.
You can all chew up the original PB story into different versions if you like but none of this is what he said. And furthermore, City may well have confidence in some parts of the case but they don't know the outcome save for the parts that were obvious within the hearing - either by being obviously dismissed or, more commonly, formally dropped at some point in the hearing and/or in closing by the other side. But that is not PBs suggestion.You are referring to the judgement i.e., justification of the outcome but City might have very good confidence on the outcome of sections of the case purely by being party to the case and knowing what was contested and what was not, and knowing what was presented and what was not.
i think he was named plato because it meant broad-shouldered.We've only got Plato's word he said anything at all, slippery character that Plato.
It doesn't chime with common sense at all. And I don't think all options are open whatever that means.Stefan doesn't have a story, he just thinks all options are still open and some a little more likely than others. PB's info chimes more with common sense. The headhunter story was openly reported although not specifying which senior PL position was being recruited. It defies belief that the panel's ruling is not also known by the parties after a period of 8 months since the hearing was completed last year. The delay in making the outcome public is clearly for a reason and the most likely is the account given by PB. Agree that the reasons for Stefan spinning out both possibilities are also pretty clear.
I'm not the one speculating.All this is speculation. The absence of any leaks suggests that the PANEL have NOT released the result to either party. HOWEVER, there is NO WAY that Khaldoon will not have sat down with his highly paid KC for a full breakdown of how the trial went & to find out his opinion of how the evidence from both sides was presented to the panel - and how they reacted to the evidence we presented.
Other than that - the only speculation that IS true is that of Pannick’s as given privately to Khaldoon.
All IMHO of course.
And he had an animal named after him…….the Duck Billed Plato Puss.i think he was named plato because it meant broad-shouldered.
were he alive today he'd definitely be a blue :)
yep,Ah, Socrates was echoed by Manuel in Fawlty Towers who said: “I know nothing”
His good friend Donald Rumsfeld provided an american-english translation.righty oh,
unanswerable questions time.
i cannot help myself now...
socrates (not the footy player) said,
"the only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
he also said,
"i know that i know nothing."
clearly he didn't say them in english.
I hoped we'd agree for once, ah well ;-)It doesn't chime with common sense at all. And I don't think all options are open whatever that means.
It is quite unusual actually in England and the time for that has passed. Which is why the government are in the dark about the case and why there is a potential diplomatic issue if City lose. If displomacy/influence had played out, there wouldn't have been a 12 week trial where the PL alleged City's owners to have committed wholesale false accounting and nor would UEFA have done the same earlier.You misunderstood my point. What I am saying is that in these sort of cases it is not unusual for political influence on all sides to play a role. The official release could be delayed for numerous reasons. I don’t know what motivation the PL had for bringing this case in the first place. But you can’t rule out old-fashioned malice, corruption, and politics like we have seen in cases like the Post Office scandal.