City extend their partnership with Puma to 2034/2035

Me too. And in the 80s, on a similar note but involves politics, I refused to buy any biscuits made by McVities because they gave coffers to Maggie and Co.

Re Sharp, I still won't buy anything either!
Agree about sharp, threw away a cassette player i had, as it was made by them, p.s, not that it matters but what the fuck is snapdragon!!
 
Agree about sharp, threw away a cassette player i had, as it was made by them, p.s, not that it matters but what the fuck is snapdragon!!
Re Snapdragon, I wondered too. But you know those interminable, very annoying ads that are on Amazon Prime TV?. Well there are so many that spring to mind, numerous times hubby have looked at each other with a shrug of ' no me neither' as to what is actually being advertised....!!). Anyway I think Snapdragon might be some sort of hardware/ software in pcs. But I could have made that up, because none of the ads ever seem to relate to the product that is being flogged to captured viewers ( speaking of which isn't Teamviewer some form of Zoom)? Or maybe not.

Anyway anything Rag, Saka, or Bellingham related, I ain't buying!!
 
Most on here seem to think so. They're expressing opinions and preferences.

Yep.

A landslide for Puma and their deal.

In terms of quality, the Puma shirts have been well ahead of the templates we often had from Nike, and you only have to look at the new NYC home shirt from Adidas to know the grass isn’t always greener.
 
Agree about sharp, threw away a cassette player i had, as it was made by them, p.s, not that it matters but what the fuck is snapdragon!!
Snapdragon mostly make computer processors for mobile devices. So if you have a mobile, laptop, tablet or smartwatch there's a high chance it's powered by Snapdragon technology
 
Happy with the amount of money it has made for City but I'm just not a Puma fan. For every decent kit they have given us, they've given us two shite ones.
As much as I love adidas, it wouldn't be right to see City wearing it. They tend to only produce kits for teams they have a history with. City should be in Umbro kits.
 
Happy with the amount of money it has made for City but I'm just not a Puma fan. For every decent kit they have given us, they've given us two shite ones.
As much as I love adidas, it wouldn't be right to see City wearing it. They tend to only produce kits for teams they have a history with. City should be in Umbro kits.
I agree that Puma's kits aren't great and Umbro's were better, but £1 billion over 10 years suggests we ought to wear Puma.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top