City extend their partnership with Puma to 2034/2035

Puma chief executive Arthur Hoeld added: "Puma's partnership with Manchester City has been a great success both on and off the pitch.

"Trophies, a perfect stage for our performance products and commercial success were exceptional."

www.bbc.co.uk

Man City agree Premier League record £1bn kit deal

Manchester City extend their kit partnership with Puma for at least 10 years, with the contract understood to be worth a minimum of £1bn, making it the largest deal in the Premier League.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
skillman said:
They’ve done some belting kits. Glad we’re staying with them. At least they try something out the ordinary each year, compared to Nike’s copy and paste motto.
Click to expand...
It's funny how Adidas get a free pass on this, when every one of their kits is an Identikit just different colour combinations.
They are the original copy and paste sportswear brand.
P s. Nike are shit at it also.
 
bluebanana83 said:
It was because he was sponsored by Puma.

As were Pele and Maradona and City…seems to be a theme.
Click to expand...
All three of those players wore Puma kings, Maradona used to remove one of the studs on each boot, something to do with balance and/or grip
 
IrishBlueSince92 said:
Piss boiling everywhere today as I ask every rag and dipper why Puma are agreeing to a record shirt deal and I thought that City didn’t sell any shirts and invented the figures just for inflated income

This and Pep attending a concert has angered many
Click to expand...
Only Surprise was no HYS on BBC on it, but then again its a positive City story so they buried it half way down the page to start with.
Comments and crying on X was a joy to read though from cooking the books to our owner paid Puma to not market value ( despite the shit Rags having one for 90 million) to the charges.
Just a shame we couldn't get 115 million a year for it
 
The task tonight is for anyone to find a rag or a victim who understands what a related party transaction is and crucially is not, and why therefore their mates at the EPL can’t challenge the value of the PUMA deal. A deal which must obviously be bent, because it dwarfs what either of them receive.
 
jimharri said:

City and Financial Doping | Charged by PL with 130 FFP breaches | Hearing concluded | Awaiting outcome

£100m per season for a club that has a significantly smaller fanbase than peers bringing in £50-75m isn’t strange at all…
www.redcafe.net www.redcafe.net


Do they not understand that our deal will be subjected to the most thorough inspection of any deal? Every tiny detail will be looked at through the most powerful magnifying glass out there.
Click to expand...
Bizarre that some actually think they adhere to the rules?? Do they live under a rock ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top