Media discussion - 2025/26

4 separate links to Fish Fingers articles on BBC Football today, and not one of them critiquing how someone with supposedley so much talent has now burnt bridges at his boyhood club, wasted his 'talent' etc..

Nip over to the Daily Heil and there are 4 separate links to a fucking Mason Mount non-story!!

This is how it is, click driven football 'news'
 
Mikejl said:
4 separate links to Fish Fingers articles on BBC Football today, and not one of them critiquing how someone with supposedley so much talent has now burnt bridges at his boyhood club, wasted his 'talent' etc..

Nip over to the Daily Heil and there are 4 separate links to a fucking Mason Mount non-story!!

This is how it is, click driven football 'news'
Click to expand...
Mason Mount, now there's a forgotten name. Does he still play or has he retired?
 
Mikejl said:
4 separate links to Fish Fingers articles on BBC Football today, and not one of them critiquing how someone with supposedley so much talent has now burnt bridges at his boyhood club, wasted his 'talent' etc..

Nip over to the Daily Heil and there are 4 separate links to a fucking Mason Mount non-story!!

This is how it is, click driven football 'news'
Click to expand...
Nothing 'new' about it - same old RDAHMeedya shite! No matter how much they sugar it, it is still 24ct shite!
 
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
Nothing 'new' about it - same old RDAHMeedya shite! No matter how much they sugar it, it is still 24ct shite!
Click to expand...
The majority of it is by design,especially regarding the rags as it gives the impression they are still relevant and challenging,constant articles on them keeps them in the public’s minds,I’ve mentioned it before I wouldn’t be surprised that utd are paying for a good percentage of this coverage regardless what context it’s in..
 
Some belters on The HYS regatrds City signing a Trafford back great sport to be had
Sounniestash (Think thats him )
Is a complete knob
 
Interesting that Talksport have had at least 3 debates in the last month comparing the rapidly increasing kids-in-the-playground-wearing-City-shirts demographic (or indigenous support as Simon Jordan described them yesterday).with United's fading brand of perpetual failure

The fact they're even discussing it is a step in the right direction, and even better, it irritates the paranoid BIGGEST CLUB IN THE WORLD armchair rags.
 
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Anything in the media people about Liverpools splurge of circa 250 million and how it is distorting the market, ruining football? Asking for a friend.






Cunts
Click to expand...
Yes, this article, NOT. Funny how there is not a whiff of negativity about Liverpool and other clubs spending money. And yet, we've bought the league previously

www.bbc.co.uk

Premier League transfers: Major clubs dominate summer spending

The biggest sides in the top flight are all at the top of the list for spending in the summer transfer window.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
I can honestly say I cannot remember the PL prize money once being deployed in the MSM as any sort of rationale for our spending in six of the seven summers from 2018 to 2024. Not once.

It’s a perfectly reasonable rationale btw. Mathematically sound and founded upon facts. It provides a logical and evidence based reasoning and justification to explain, at least in part, Liverpool’s spending this summer.

It’s so telling that it wasn’t deployed in the same way to explain ours.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
I can honestly say I cannot remember the PL prize money once being deployed in the MSM as any sort of rationale for our spending in six of the seven summers from 2018 to 2024. Not once.

It’s a perfectly reasonable rationale btw. Mathematically sound and founded upon facts. It provides a logical and evidence based reasoning and justification to explain, at least in part, Liverpool’s spending this summer.

It’s so telling that it wasn’t deployed in the same way to explain ours.
Click to expand...

It used to make me piss when Sky question how we can afford a transfer fee especially when they’ll pay a major share of it.
 
jrb said:
The whole of the Red Shirt Cartel media is pushing the Isak transfer to Liverpool. It's fucking unreal.

If that was City, City would get absolutely slaughtered for spending £150mill on Isak, and for spending £400mill in this transfer window.
Click to expand...
Just proves the bias the red shirts have.
Stone on a jolly again with the Rags in the USA and their entire pre season are against poor opposition, doing pointless daily articles. He actually went to Asia with them for their pointless post season friendly instead of reporting on the CWC final. Chief football reporter lol.
Then the BBC suddenly don't highlight poor crowds ie the 22k only for Arsenal v Milan in Singapore, seems its only the CWC they had daily articles on it.
And everyone trying to defend/justify the Dippers spending, Spitty quiet on it despite criticising others previously.
 
jrb said:
The whole of the Red Shirt Cartel media is pushing the Isak transfer to Liverpool. It's fucking unreal.

If that was City, City would get absolutely slaughtered for spending £150mill on Isak, and for spending £400mill in this transfer window.
Click to expand...
Like the BBC's 'Hey big spenders' headline for them. Whereas ours would be more like 'State owned Manchester City spend yet again whilst facing looming charges'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top