President Trump

REPORTER: What are you hoping Todd Blanche gets out of his meetings with Ghislaine Maxwell?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Well, I don’t know about the meeting. I know it’s taking place. And he’s a fantastic man. He’s a great attorney.

And people should really focus on how well the country is doing, or they should focus on the fact that Barack Hussein Obama led a coup, or they should focus on the fact that Larry Summers from Harvard, that Bill Clinton, who you know very well, and lots of other friends — really close friends of Jeffrey. Summers should be spoken about, because, you know — Jeffrey Epstein should be spoken about.

And they should speak about them because they don’t talk about them, they talk about me. I have nothing to do with the guy!

www.mediaite.com

Trump Demands Reporters Stop Talking About Him And Epstein In New White House Scrum — Claims ‘I Have Nothing To Do With The Guy!’

Trump demanded that reporters stop talking about him and deceased sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein and offered a list of other topics.
www.mediaite.com www.mediaite.com

It was predicted that one day Trump would say "Jeffrey Epstein? Never heard of him."

We are that close.
 
Username Required said:
Trump has more pictures with Jeffrey Epstein than most people have with their grandparents.

Trump likes to tell people he is a genius, very smart. MAGA like to tell people Trump kicked Epstein out of his life because Epstein was a creep, not because of a real estate disagreement involving two huge egos.

They never really want to tell you what made Epstein a creep in Trump's eyes back then, after years of intimacy.

"Creep" is a pretty vague term in itself, it really invites the reader to fill-in-the-blanks, rather than informing the reader of any specific acts or behaviors.

What did Trump know, and when did he know it?
Click to expand...
Watch this interview from last night's Jen Psaki's show.

www.msnbc.com

Epstein accuser speaks out on Trump: Maria Farmer wants to testify, access her records

Maria Farmer, one of the first women to speak out about the abuses of Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, and her attorney, Jennifer Freeman, talk with Jen Psaki about why she told investigators about Donald Trump, and her desire to testify to Congress and gain access to her...
www.msnbc.com www.msnbc.com
 
"...we have no inflation, we wiped out inflation.”
Donald Trump, July 25th 2025

“It doesn’t sound good, but you make a hell of a lot more money with a weaker dollar—not a weak dollar, but a weaker dollar,” Trump said, claiming that America’s trading partners, including China and Japan, were “fighting” for their own weaker currencies.

“And it’s good psychologically, it makes you feel good,” he added.

 
Username Required said:
"...we have no inflation, we wiped out inflation.”
Donald Trump, July 25th 2025

“It doesn’t sound good, but you make a hell of a lot more money with a weaker dollar—not a weak dollar, but a weaker dollar,” Trump said, claiming that America’s trading partners, including China and Japan, were “fighting” for their own weaker currencies.

“And it’s good psychologically, it makes you feel good,” he added.

Click to expand...
Most of his dumbass base don't even know what inflation is, let alone understand it, buy hey, he's wiped it out. Must be good, right?
 
This is what is known as wiping out inflation.

"...we have no inflation, we wiped out inflation.”
Donald Trump, July 25th 2025

“June 2025 marked the first month since data collection began in the 1980s that ground beef prices rose above $6 per pound,”

“ground beef prices across the U.S. continue to reach new highs, driven by shrinking cattle herds, with looming import restrictions threatening to push costs even higher.”

“According to government data released last week, the average price of a pound of 100 percent ground beef rose to $6.12 last month, up from $5.98 in May and $5.47 in June 2024,”

“According to the Consumer Price Index released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on July 15, steaks saw the largest increase among beef products in June—up 12.4 percent since June 2024 at an unadjusted rate, followed by ground beef at 10.3 percent. This compares to a 0.5 percent increase for pork products and 3.9 percent for chicken.”

“We’re dealing with lower supplies of beef, and that’s what’s really driving up our prices of beef right now,’

[I read a couple of days ago that the bottom line is that there are 87 million beef cattle in the US for a population of 330 million, and 87 million is the lowest number since 1951 when the population was 155million. Cattle only have one young at a time with a 9 month gestation and need for recovery. They aren't sheep, or pigs, or hens. It takes YEARS to increase herd size if you want to keep a steady supply of meat to eat - if you want to increase herd size rapidly you have to withdraw a significant number from slaughter and mark them for breeding only. Of course if ranchers slaughter less they aren't making money now but they have to find money to support breeders. Another issue with decreasing supply / high demand is that some ranchers are actually removing stock from breeding to slaughter to take advantage of record prices now, rather than speculating about prices 3-5 years down the line. Ooops.]

In addition, “in May, the U.S. suspended live cattle imports from Mexico because of the New World Screwworm, a parasitic flesh-eating maggot,” Tyko reported. “Andrew Coppin, CEO and co-founder of Ranchbot, tells Axios the temporary banning of the import of Mexican cattle added to this price pressure.”

Moving forward, “a new 50% U.S. tariff on Brazilian imports starting Aug. 1 could further disrupt global supply chains,” Tyko reported. “Brazil accounts for around 23% of all U.S. beef imports. Brazilian meatpackers are reconsidering future beef shipments to the U.S. because of the tariff, Reuters reported Tuesday.”

farmpolicynews.illinois.edu

Beef Prices Soar to Record Highs in June - Farm Policy News

Ground beef prices across the U.S. continue to reach new highs, driven by shrinking cattle herds, with looming import restrictions threatening to push costs even higher. The average price of a pound of 100% ground beef rose to $6.12 last month, up from $5.98 in May.
farmpolicynews.illinois.edu
 
Teresa Helm, who was abused by Epstein in the early 2000s, was also personally groomed by Maxwell. Maxwell lured Helm to Epstein’s New York apartment, telling the then-22-year-old she was there for a “job interview.”

www.mediaite.com

Epstein Survivor Says Maxwell Pardon Would Be 'Crumbling' of Justice System: 'Upside Down World'

A woman who survived abuse from infamous pedophile Jeffery Epstein told MSNBC on Friday that pardoning his conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell "would mean the complete crumbling of this justice system."
www.mediaite.com www.mediaite.com

Helm served as a key witness in Maxwell’s trial, which resulted in Maxwell being sentenced to 20 years in prison. When asked by Cabrera how she felt about the current meetings between the administration and Maxwell, Helm said she was “deeply concerned.”

“I first and foremost would adamantly state that her credibility is zero.” said Helm. “She has previously been charged with perjury, so we already know that she’s capable and willing and ready to lie under oath.”

"There needs to be the transparency because there are women here– many women that have gone through these lived experiences, that that is something that cannot be taken away or simply shut down. It cannot be shut down. These are experiences that have been had and you don’t have this experience after experience with so many different women and go on to say that there’s actually nothing here, because there have been multiple people to support this perpetual abuse and exploitation for decades.

Again, I cannot stress enough the fact that there are so many people that have, again I’m just repeating myself, perpetuated decades of exploitation. My personal experience I know of three different women that led me down the path to me taking myself to the home of Jeffrey Epstein, where he assaulted me. I know of an additional fourth woman who followed up with an email thanking me for my time there if you could believe that, which is a part of the normalization of the abuse. So just in my experience, I have four women, Jeffrey Epstein, who assaulted me, and I have an additional gentleman, the chef that I met in Jeffrey’s home. I have the driver, I have the place that I stayed, which was Jeffrey Epstein’s brother’s apartment building. You have all the accomplices there. So these are just the people that helped facilitate. What about all the people that these other women were exploited and trafficked to? There are so many people involved, and there have been so many people involved for decades. So there’s zero sense to be made to say that there’s actually nothing here.

MAGA: "Early 2000? This woman is clearly on Obama's payroll. She needs to be investigated herself."
 
is this a fair point?

See, this is what I don't get.
These women are being paraded around making allegations but not once, NOT EVER, do they drop any names.
I'm getting tired of the charade.
Either it happened or it didn't, and if it did, who did it?
It's really that fucking simple.
But no, we have to rely on bureaucrats, files that nobody knows what they say (if anything), and media spots that talk about how horrible the experience was but just don't expect them to recount much else.
The more this goes, the less believable it gets.
Its like having a r*** trial with an empty defense chair.

They probably signed NDA agreements and were paid for their compliance.

Even if that were the case, an NDA is non-binding in the event of a violent crime.
Theres literally no excuse why these women cant drop the names of their assailants.
Theyre on tv all the freaking time so clearly they don't feel they are in jeopardy.

This is becoming an absolute circus. Can Teresa Helm name anyone other than Epstien as an abuser?
 
flook said:
So why would Pam Bondi say there was a client list on her desk? Why would shitgibbons campaign feature the release of said list so prominently?
Click to expand...
1. Lots of Maga folks make this claim. And as a lawyer she should know better. But I think there is a fair claim that she was simply loose with her words. If you watched the interview the guy asks something like
Qst: So when are we going to get the Epstein's list?
Ans: Its on my desk for review right now, and the JFK files, and the So and so file. All on my desk. So very soon.

Its understandable, that the questioner and listeners assumed she was talking about the Epstein list. As that was the question she was asked. But its quite possible her response was referring to the Epstein file as amongst all the other files she claimed was on her desk for review.

Frankly, its possible she presumed before reviewing the file that there would be an Epstein list in there. Only to review and find there wasn't.

Her response can legitimately be read either way.


flook said:
If as Bondi later, back-pedalling furiously claimed, she misspoke and actually meant "Epstein‑related evidence" was such evidence frequently (prior to the Bondi statement) referred to as a client list.
Click to expand...
No it wasn't. But she never actually said Epstein list. The interviewer did. She simply responded that it was on her desk awaiting review. And in the same sentence she included other files that were awaiting review.

She'll get no reprieve but i can genuinely see her point of view.


flook said:
Frankly I think option 3 is the least likely by a margin to be true. It's almost unthinkable that Epstein wouldn't maintain evidence against high profile clients for his own protection at the very least, and thats without falling down the bribery rabbit hole
Click to expand...
You are assuming my saying there are no Epstein list suggests it doesn't exist. No. Its possible it exists but she actually doesn't have it. And now she's stick in a catch 22.
 
Dax777 said:
1. Lots of Maga folks make this claim. And as a lawyer she should know better. But I think there is a fair claim that she was simply loose with her words. If you watched the interview the guy asks something like
Qst: So when are we going to get the Epstein's list?
Ans: Its on my desk for review right now, and the JFK files, and the So and so file. All on my desk. So very soon.

Its understandable, that the questioner and listeners assumed she was talking about the Epstein list. As that was the question she was asked. But its quite possible her response was referring to the Epstein file as amongst all the other files she claimed was on her desk for review.

Frankly, its possible she presumed before reviewing the file that there would be an Epstein list in there. Only to review and find there wasn't.

Her response can legitimately be read either way.



No it wasn't. But she never actually said Epstein list. The interviewer did. She simply responded that it was on her desk awaiting review. And in the same sentence she included other files that were awaiting review.

She'll get no reprieve but i can genuinely see her point of view.



You are assuming my saying there are no Epstein list suggests it doesn't exist. No. Its possible it exists but she actually doesn't have it. And now she's stick in a catch 22.
Click to expand...
Give over mate you are making a fool of yourself, respectfully
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top