I really dont get this article. If people in their 50s are such a valuable resource to keep in employment, why is there so much ageism that is allowed to persist in the private sector ?
The first people to go if there is a restructure are the older (more expensive) people and very few businesses are keen on employing older people in junior roles.
Nearly everyone I know who have retired in their 50s (except those in the police/fire service) have not done it on their own volition, its because they have been made redundant and then been unable to find a job afterwards. Would they rather people not access their pensions and instead claim benefits ?
If they want people to be employed in their late 50s and beyond there needs to be a step change in how businesses perceive the older workforce.