For sure that's exactly the way fans of the red cartel will see it! We're just going around in circles at this point.MCFC is biggest threat the premier league as have ever seen.
We have single handedly desecrated the original top four which was "The Brand"
As a result of years of success on and off the field and sweeping up countless trophies the red cartel are in a tale spin.
The rags have become a laughing stock, the dippers have had to resort to spending over £300,000,000.00 in the hope of defending their title and the tarquins are still banging on about their invincibility.
This is just another tactic to slow our progress. The premier league and the red cartel have accepted they can't stop MCFC, but if they can put up the occasional road block it gives them a sense of satisfaction.
From your professional experience and given the general idea that decisions within the realm of sport or even public interest in general seem to be expedited, are we still within a reasonable time frame or is it close to a "what's taking so long?"Nobody (KCs on both sides included) knows (or rather as of the time when I got this information, knew) when the decision will be/would be made. There was an initial expectation (it doesn't seem that was based on anything other than general experience ie not from the IC itself) around March/April but that came and went. This information was from multiple sources earlier in the Summer so it is possible more guidance has now been given but I am minded to think it remains a black box. As you'd imagine, various very senior parties (lawyers and principals) have been on holiday and will be on holiday - they are not simply cancelling everything pending a decision. Obviously, as ever, believe what you like.
"Tonight there's gonna be a jailbreak" !!
'Paying them off' is such a weak argument! It means PL are corrupt and are willing to be bribed. Now, it goes both way though. I mean we can argue that the rival clubs paid the PL off to bring the charges in the first place. And we could have bribed them before they brought the charges to eliminate all the hassle, media scrutiny and massive legal fees.I do love the idea that opposing fans will be convinced we’ve ’paid them off’ should we be largely exonerated. One of those fans even told me we’d likely get found guilty on a couple of minor issues so it ‘wouldn’t look obvious we’d paid someone off’.
And yet, we couldn’t pay them off to make it go away either before it even started or much much sooner than now!!!
Somebody needs to go round and prod them with a stick, just to make sure they’re still alive.From your professional experience and given the general idea that decisions within the realm of sport or even public interest in general seem to be expedited, are we still within a reasonable time frame or is it close to a "what's taking so long?"
Great but, Ric only has about 29 pixels to play with :-)
A prick by the sounds of it.Serious question here , who the Fcuk is Connor Moore .
![]()
Everton sell women's team to parent company in move that helps PSR compliance
Everton sell their women's team to the parent company which owns the club - a move that will improve their compliance with the Premier League's profitability and sustainability rules.www.bbc.co.uk
![]()
Everton sell women's team to parent company in move that helps PSR compliance
Everton sell their women's team to the parent company which owns the club - a move that will improve their compliance with the Premier League's profitability and sustainability rules.www.bbc.co.uk
It’s more than possible. The PL has a track record of making blunders, especially legal ones.& the board, they were all in on it except Matthew Ryder KC who was brought in after.
Alison Brittain, Richard Masters, May Fyfield, Dharmush Mistry must have known but not a fucking chance did they run it past a KC, to compound the charges & get the press release wrong.
So is it possible the board didn’t have the relevant knowledge or experience & got it horrendously wrong?