We have been here before Marvin and you ignore the question every time. How can stones have been integral when his availability has been less than 50%? That does not mean he hasn't played a part, of course he has and we love him but I could maybe point to a couple of seasons where he was that important to us, out of 9 seasons that is poor. We've won leagues without Stones due to him being injured, believing his presence is as important as Rodri is insulting.
He played a part in a few seasons out of 9.A huge part in 1 or 2. If you are not on the pitch you cannot play a huge part. It is pretty simple. If we are relying on 31 year old John Stones who has started 18 league games in two years to contribute in a change in our fortunes then you are going to be incredibly disappointed.