I can read competently, I simply can't make sense of a nonsensical comment.
For anything to be "dodgy" would require the purchasing club to be in collusion with Chelsea over this alleged dodgy deal.
So what benefit would a broke Everton get from paying more than they could for a bang average midfielder? And the same question applied to the Saudi club buying Felix or Arsenal buying Madueke or Burnley buying two of their forgotten players.
Thats a lot of clubs, some of which are not flush with cash, putting themselves out of pocket to help Chelsea with some kind of underhanded transfer with seemingly no benefit.
If you're still not seeing the flaws in that logic, theres a cult down the road that would love to recruit you.