Jack Grealish | Set to join Everton on season-long loan

Status
Not open for further replies.
King Jay said:
Question is you pay him that to play for city. If he turns into a bench player and wants to play somewhere else to get game time then the club doesn’t have to . Do they? He doesnt need to leave.
Click to expand...
We are clearly forcing him out
 
B\connellblue said:
He's had more than enough time to be "great" for us. He hasn't managed it. He wasn't great during the treble Season either. He had a good 3 months. Let's not rewrite history.
Click to expand...
Pep didn’t give him a chance last season by not playing him, I know things might have happened in training we are not aware of but he did ok in the 2 games he played last season.
 
BlueMoonRisin’ said:
Seems like Everton and Spurts are reluctant to fully pay his wages. If so walk they should away. Grealish was told end of last season to find another club. If he can't through greedily holding out for the loan club to fully pay his wages I'd bring him back and having him training with our academy lads and watching games from the the main stand. I don't see why we should be expected to subsidise his wages after loaning him out without a loan fee. We aren't a benevolent fund or charity. Time to get tough in player negotiatings I think.
Click to expand...

I've never been a massive grealish fan but it's not greed to want the wage you have been promised in a contract. That's not on him, it's on us for paying him that much in the first place
 
BlueMoonRisin’ said:
Seems like Everton and Spurts are reluctant to fully pay his wages. If so walk they should away. Grealish was told end of last season to find another club. If he can't through greedily holding out for the loan club to fully pay his wages I'd bring him back and having him training with our academy lads and watching games from the the main stand. I don't see why we should be expected to subsidise his wages after loaning him out without a loan fee. We aren't a benevolent fund or charity. Time to get tough in player negotiatings I think.
Click to expand...
Seems a choice of paying his full wages (he stays) or a portion of them (he goes on loan). I think the latter is probably the more sensible. Both parties agreed the contract and as far as I know Jack hasn't breached the terms. If he has done something in training or any other poor behaviour then the club would be within its rights to censor him. They haven't. Its a sad outcome for the guy. Maybe we will know more when he leaves.
 
mdj0520 said:
I've never been a massive grealish fan but it's not greed to want the wage you have been promised in a contract. That's not on him, it's on us for paying him that much in the first place
Click to expand...
He's been stealing a living most of the time here by half hearted performances. I'm disappointed in him tbh. If we end up subsidising his loan I'll be pissed off.
 
B\connellblue said:
He's had more than enough time to be "great" for us. He hasn't managed it. He wasn't great during the treble Season either. He had a good 3 months. Let's not rewrite history.
Click to expand...

B\connellblue said:
These Grealish threads just go around in endless Circles. The man in charge no longer wants him here so it's the end.
Click to expand...

The man in charge picked Grealish over a period of 3 seasons where we won 3 Premier Leagues, 1 Champions League, 1 FA Cup,1 UEFA Super Cup and 1 FIFA Club World Cup

Puts to bed your bullshit that he only had a good 3 months.
 
Centurions said:
So you're saying he was crap in the other 16 games he started in all comps plus the subbed in games?
Click to expand...

Given Grealish started 1 PL defeat in the past 2 seasons I wouldn't say he was, no - who are you blaming for the other 11 PL defeats in that period?
 
Probably nothing to it but when Alister Mann on commentary was naming players we’d left behind, to emphasise our squad depth he didn’t mention Grealish? Wonder if he’d been told not to mention him or whatever. Like I say probably nothing to it but wondered if anyone else noticed?
 
1dart said:
Probably nothing to it but when Alister Mann on commentary was naming players we’d left behind, to emphasise our squad depth he didn’t mention Grealish? Wonder if he’d been told not to mention him or whatever. Like I say probably nothing to it but wondered if anyone else noticed?
Click to expand...
He was listing those left behind injured, Jack isn't in that category, unfortunately he is just being ostracised as we want rid and don't deem that we have to treat him in a professional way any longer. We're being cunts with him and forcing him out not behaviour I like to see from us to be honest.
 
uwerosler28 said:
He was listing those left behind injured, Jack isn't in that category, unfortunately he is just being ostracised as we want rid and don't deem that we have to treat him in a professional way any longer. We're being cunts with him and forcing him out not behaviour I like to see from us to be honest.
Click to expand...
Ye I agree, not like City though is it, makes you wonder what’s gone on
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top