Richards was trying to defend the weak United keeperPathetic desperate needy rag sycophantic **** that David Jones on Sly Sports main event.
He's actually pressing Roy Keane to say something positive about the rags.
That thick fucker Sturridge saying "the players will go into the dressing room disappointed they lost the game but they'll be pleased to see progress from last season"
Richards is just Richards, a clown for Sly who says whatever the producers tell him to say.
Daily Heil comparative headers
Rags:
Bryan Mbeumo and Matheus Cunha showed just how much Man United have struggled in attack. Ruben Amorim was right... he HAD to rip it up and start over, writes NATHAN SALT - WHY RUBEN WAS RIGHT
City
The huge headache Pep Guardiola has despite Wolves rout - and why there is no easy fix
'Playing well' and losing is a very bad combination.Danny Murphy polishing the turd that is united on the beeb today. Battling defeats at home are now lauded as major victories. That's where they are at.
You may yet be rightHe looks like a fat Henry XIII
My point exactly.He means Khaldoon. Don’t you realise “they are all the same” to racists like Deloony.
‘Financial irregularities’ ffs.The Times - LFC`s Partner Sponsor - Standard Chartered
Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican congresswoman, who asked the US attorney general to probe Standard Chartered bank over alleged terrorist payments has had an impact on LFC`s long term, prominent partner sponsor who Liverpool are "proud" to be associated with.
"Shares in Standard Chartered have fallen in overnight trading in Hong Kong, trading down almost 4 per cent, as they catch up with a sharp sell-off in London on Friday. More than £2 billion was wiped off the value of Standard Chartered’s London-listed shares in late trading on Friday after they fell 8 per cent."
The fall followed comments over alleged terrorist payments.
Standard Chartered has previously been fined record amounts for financial irregularities.
Am surprised that they even mentioned Liverpool! Watch other media though say absolutely nought about it if it was us with that sponsor the whole of the media would be talking about itThe Times - LFC`s Partner Sponsor - Standard Chartered
Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican congresswoman, who asked the US attorney general to probe Standard Chartered bank over alleged terrorist payments has had an impact on LFC`s long term, prominent partner sponsor who Liverpool are "proud" to be associated with.
"Shares in Standard Chartered have fallen in overnight trading in Hong Kong, trading down almost 4 per cent, as they catch up with a sharp sell-off in London on Friday. More than £2 billion was wiped off the value of Standard Chartered’s London-listed shares in late trading on Friday after they fell 8 per cent."
The fall followed comments over alleged terrorist payments.
Standard Chartered has previously been fined record amounts for financial irregularities.
Another useless twat to burst on the scene from what I can gather from yesterday’s performanceRichards was trying to defend the weak United keeper
Sounds like you need to send one of them letters...There must still be a small hard core of fans who like to tune in to BBC1 at 10:20 pm not knowing the scores. They must spend all Saturday evening in a media blackout. No TV news, no radio, no Internet. Daren't go to the pub or out to get a takeaway in case somebody mentions a match result. Then, at 10:15, the half wits on the BBC News report on the main football highlights of the day so that these poor souls have to be reminded to "look away now." If Match of the Day is literally being shown in the next 5 minutes why do they have to report on the days' games in the news? Most fans already know the scores because they have had five hours to check them out, and those who don't know the scores are those who have spent five hours deliberately trying to avoid hearing them.
Yes, that didn't go unnoticed.Richards was trying to defend the weak United keeper
There must still be a small hard core of fans who like to tune in to BBC1 at 10:20 pm not knowing the scores. They must spend all Saturday evening in a media blackout. No TV news, no radio, no Internet. Daren't go to the pub or out to get a takeaway in case somebody mentions a match result. Then, at 10:15, the half wits on the BBC News report on the main football highlights of the day so that these poor souls have to be reminded to "look away now." If Match of the Day is literally being shown in the next 5 minutes why do they have to report on the days' games in the news? Most fans already know the scores because they have had five hours to check them out, and those who don't know the scores are those who have spent five hours deliberately trying to avoid hearing them.
Henry VIII ?He looks like a fat Henry XIII