Media discussion - 2025/26

Tracking back said:
Good!

It's about time one of those media outlets referred to him as a Liverpool fan.

I know it would never happen, but I do sometimes wonder if it was Liverpool or the rags that were being investigating for 115 charges of financial irregularities how the media would frame it?

Would it be a pile on from all corners of the British Press and broadcasting media?

I strongly doubt it. After all if it's taken this long to connect an "alleged" racist to one of the most protected clubs in England, one would think the media would take full control of the narrative surrounding anything as controversial as that.
Click to expand...
They wouldn't be going to court claiming it was in "the public interest" in order to write anything in the first place, that's for damned sure. If you're not aware it was the Daily Mails owners who convinced the courts that it was a good idea in our case.
 
TinFoilHat said:
Neil Ashton briefing his client journalists well.

National gaslighting of how the rags played.

Any other club they'd be saying Rimjob is on borrowed time.
Click to expand...
Don’t think Ashton has been involved there for a while now, he was Woodward’s personal mouthpiece
Meanwhile, looks like Brexit Jim is hiring for a new shill to spin his next round of working-class staff redunancies

Head of Corporate Communications
https://share.google/5SrRFGmJT5difbqgj
 
LongsightM13 said:
Don’t think Ashton has been involved there for a while now, he was Woodward’s personal mouthpiece
Meanwhile, looks like Brexit Jim is hiring for a new shill to spin his next round of working-class staff redunancies

Head of Corporate Communications
https://share.google/5SrRFGmJT5difbqgj
Click to expand...
Hasn’t he already hired Simon Stone for that job?
 
Just had a comment removed from Stone's latest bbc column on United to the effect that he has been downgraded to 'manchester united reporter' and asking who the dedicated correspondents are for other clubs. Apparently it was 'derailing the conversation'. Ah well...
 
Kun!Kun!Kun! said:
Just had a comment removed from Stone's latest bbc column on United to the effect that he has been downgraded to 'manchester united reporter' and asking who the dedicated correspondents are for other clubs. Apparently it was 'derailing the conversation'. Ah well...
Click to expand...
Can’t remember who but i think someone on here sent an FOI about his not one but two two trips abroad as ‘Chief Football Reporter’ to follow a single club
The reply referred to him as their ‘dedicated united reporter’
So they blundered into saying the quiet bit out loud
I imagine the torrent of criticism they’ve subsequently been getting from fans of all but the redshirt clubs this summer over ther united obsession means they tweaked his job title
As an aside they had the execrable Sami Mokbel on Football Focus on Saturday. I can’t believe I’m saying this but if anything, he came across as even thicker than Stone. A masterclass in talking loads but saying nothing, and stating the obvious. Zero insights or anything new
 
The BBC write about the spending this summer and include a graphic for highest amount paid for a player by club. Was Jack £101m or £100m
 

Attachments

  • 1000043884.jpg
    1000043884.jpg
    163.7 KB · Views: 100
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top