70 seems a good price to meIf it were the other way round how much do you think they’d be quoting us, certainly alot more than £70m, just don’t think this figure will interest City.
70 seems a good price to meIf it were the other way round how much do you think they’d be quoting us, certainly alot more than £70m, just don’t think this figure will interest City.
I think Tolm hinted as much when he mentioned the pre match canapés....Imagine this gets ironed out the next few days. It's funny it appears that we are doing what Spurs did to us and being completely non responsive, im sure it will be discussed with the powers at be at the game.
Ironed out, West Ham StyalImagine this gets ironed out the next few days. It's funny it appears that we are doing what Spurs did to us and being completely non responsive, im sure it will be discussed with the powers at be at the game.
Haha..that would be gone with a month of Rodrygo’s wages.
It’s tricky..if we sell Sav and then Real Madrid don’t play ball…would you be happy with the money and no replacement?
I often wonder how these things work.
As well as selling Alvarez and now having MarmoushIt’s tricky..if we sell Sav and then Real Madrid don’t play ball…would you be happy with the money and no replacement?
I often wonder how these things work.
If they pay 80m for him, he’s less dangerous than Brennan Johnson so if they want to start Sav over him good luck to themI guess we are better off not selling to a rival.
Brentford Bournemouth Brighton?I guess we are better off not selling to a rival.
Spurs are not rivals. They will be top 4 this season.I guess we are better off not selling to a rival.
just wrong footed?
That’s what we thought with Kane first game of the season and he was even benched for that game and it still didn’t happenImagine this gets ironed out the next few days. It's funny it appears that we are doing what Spurs did to us and being completely non responsive, im sure it will be discussed with the powers at be at the game.
Rodrygo refused them