United Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Bluesince1979 said:
Its tricky, it was a pen, mount was wrestled to the ground. Problem is, right behind him, fatty shaw was wrestling a fulham defender to the ground.
So which was the ‘worst’ foul?

Still… united were utter gash. So ya know…
Click to expand...
Wrong! Mount was all over Bassey before he brushed him off. Mount knew what he was doing and so did Bassey. There was literally nothing to see apart fromt the usual grappling.
 
Is it too soon to say that the media and pundits have got egg on their face?

I only ask this because, all I've hear from them over the summer is how prolific and lethal the rag's new signings are.

Now mathematics was never my strong point but, I would suggest one goal from two games isn't great.

Add to that, if the build up (foul/push in the back with both hands) was any other team it would have been ruled out by VAR.
 
No mention of the blatant push by Yoro on the Fulham player before the United goal either... I mean, if you're going to give fouls for pushes and grappling at one end, how about the other? No? Ah, ok. After all, this is Manshesh 'nited were talking about...

Also the ref in this new stadium announcement thing says Fulham number 3 fouled the 'Manchester' player. Made my skin crawl.
 
bluetonium said:
No mention of the blatant push by Yoro on the Fulham player before the United goal either... I mean, if you're going to give fouls for pushes and grappling at one end, how about the other? No? Ah, ok. After all, this is Manshesh 'nited were talking about...

Also the ref in this new stadium announcement thing says Fulham number 3 fouled the 'Manchester' player. Made my skin crawl.
Click to expand...
NBC mentioned the push and questioned why the goal was allowed as it was the same argument for the scum penalty.

Who knew the rags would get the first penalty for holding eh..?
 
Bluesince1979 said:
Its tricky, it was a pen, mount was wrestled to the ground. Problem is, right behind him, fatty shaw was wrestling a fulham defender to the ground.
So which was the ‘worst’ foul?

Still… united were utter gash. So ya know…
Click to expand...
Sky said the Shaw foul wasnt looked at as it wasn't a penalty decision because the attacking team committed the foul. Really? So does that mean the attacking teams can foul at will at corners and nothing will be given because its not a penalty decision. What a load of utter shit they spout, they make it up as they go along.

Although the rags did commit a foul whilst attacking and scored from it so who the fuck knows anymore.
 
dadnlad said:
Quite confident of Burnley winning its the team a week later I'm worried about
Click to expand...
Well technically it'll be two weeks later (blasted Internationals) but I take your point.

However, I'm hoping Pep has realised by now that any reverence that shit stain of a club had has dried up like a white dog turd.
 
bluetonium said:
No mention of the blatant push by Yoro on the Fulham player before the United goal either... I mean, if you're going to give fouls for pushes and grappling at one end, how about the other? No? Ah, ok. After all, this is Manshesh 'nited were talking about...

Also the ref in this new stadium announcement thing says Fulham number 3 fouled the 'Manchester' player. Made my skin crawl.
Click to expand...
It's a piss take of the highest order.

Yet, despite all the help they get, the fuckers have still only managed to score one goal in two games and that should have been ruled out by VAR.

So much for their prolific front three.

More media hype....... rince and repeat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top