" cheating bastards have got away with it again"BBC have opened the City report to comment? Shock, horror. What a surprise.
there we go blues save you the bother
" cheating bastards have got away with it again"BBC have opened the City report to comment? Shock, horror. What a surprise.
Probably will announce the new deals instead this week, whilst also thanking Levy for all his hard work.I wish City had simply included in their statement that the Etihad sponsorship has now been confirmed as compliant and officially approved by the Premier League.
That addition smacks of a win.
Which you said last time but as we sit here today, we have a very extensive and strong set of APT rules and all the FMV rules that went before them too. So, it couldn't have been that emphatic could it.

The elite rich …
No club in England has ever spent so much in a transfer window as Liverpool have just done. And no club in England has ever spent as much on one player as Liverpool have just done (twice in one window)
But not to our detriment now I assume?They went back (in some regard to 2021 APT rules). Still stringent APT rules.
Thick cunts dont realise that this was an action taken by us against the league." cheating bastards have got away with it again"
there we go blues save you the bother
An official statement of that kind would be an admission of a loss for the PL. They aren't going to *admit* defeat in a public statement as part of a settlement, no matter how many compromises they made.Don't think the club would have kept fighting it of they came to the opinion the rules were lawful and it was a lost cause. That would be irresponsible, particularly with the ongoing 115 and where that is at.
Where does any official statement claim the Etihad deal baing passed is a part of this settlement?
Maybe we have all of this ready for when the 115 bollocks gets dropped too.Disappointed the club agreed not to maje any further comment on this. The PL have dragged our name through mud and now it seems we have won this case v them, we should be calling out their illegal rules
I see it as a significant win. The objective was to get these deals approved. It is being reported that these deals will be approved as part of the settlement. City have never denied the principle of FMV. We challenged APT 1 and APT 2 because we felt that challenging the lawfulness of the rules was our most aggressive option in being able to get our sponsorship deals approved. As it is, we seem to have got the result by reaching a settlement with the PL. This might not set a precedent for future challenges by any club, but it overturns the initial blocking of our 2023 sponsorship deal with Etihad.It’s a significant win. If you don’t see it that way, great, you crack straight on.
BBC dressing it up as a win for the PL…but it really isn’t. They’ve conceded their stance on Etihad deal was unlawful. All we have conceded is accept the amended rules.
Beeb only pick and choose to report what suits them
Ostensibly this is completely separate from the 115 case, but I can't imagine we'd have agreed to drop it if we felt we were about to get fucked over on the 115.
Nah, all expenses trip to UAE and bury the fucker in the desertIf we win the 115 i hope the club hammers him and anyone like him if they continue to call us cheats