johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
For FA read PLFrom what I gather (and this is only conjecture) is that this has nothing to do with the 115 charges. It's more to do with the APT (Associated Party Transaction) rules. In effect, the FA have agreed that we were perfectly fine in conducting business the way we did, 'however' they will change the rules from now on. We challenged the rules on the basis that we'd done nothing wrong in our past dealings (which the FA accepts) but we also wanted these conditions to continue into the future (which the FA disagrees with). It's a win for us 'restrospectively' but a back-handed win as the FA doesn't want to lose face entirely so will now 'amend' the rules for the forthcoming seasons.

