United Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Marvin. said:
That game turned on the early sending off and the injury to Cole Palmer. When the game evened up on numbers, Chelsea didn't have the players available to equalise but they were the better side at 2-1. Utd beat Chelsea because they got all the possible breaks.

Utd are imo a mid-table side, and I don't think Utd fans are going to accept that.
Click to expand...
Deluded cunts, let them think what they want, they’re shite
 
coolcity said:
One thing I can guarantee with Ratcliffe is he won't put in any more than he can possibly avoid doing. Everybody who has ever worked for or with him, and I'm talking about at exec level not just factory floor employees, has said he's a tight arsed git who won't spend.

He's good a raising finance though, usually with other peoples money, like the not insignificant amount he got paid from the government for distributing covid masks, and the nice wedge he got for the Ineos factory which he pocketed and then set up in France instead, similar to what James Dyson did.

Personally I think he'll be looking for a way out when the novelty wears off and he realises how expensive it is to run an ailing football club.
Click to expand...
Margaret Thatcher said something along the lines of socialists are good at spending other people's money.

Capitalists seem to be far better though.
 
Just send the highlights.

Chelsea red card ? Not sure, the keeper wasn't the last man as two Chelsea players were covering. I guess he was sent off for dangerous play which it was.
Rags first goal seemed off side to me, why wasn't there any lines draw to prove it one way or the other ?

I gave up watching the highlights after that seems bent
 
I hate that lot but the video of that coked up bald **** pulling that lad's hair is crazy.

The bald rag c*nt probably wanted some for his own head. The bloke is unhinged, 50 odd year old blokes really need to keep off the coke.
 
ninjamonkey said:
"Won't be winning trophies anymore" they sang about Garnacho who left United after 5 years with a league and fa cup winners medal to his name to join a side who won 2 trophies last season alone. Its especially funny when they still think it's the 90's
Click to expand...
Apparently they sang it at Tevez when he left. That didn’t end well!
 
give it to gordon said:
Just send the highlights.

Chelsea red card ? Not sure, the keeper wasn't the last man as two Chelsea players were covering. I guess he was sent off for dangerous play which it was.
Rags first goal seemed off side to me, why wasn't there any lines draw to prove it one way or the other ?

I gave up watching the highlights after that seems bent
Click to expand...
Who encouraged the Chavs keeper to make such a rash challenge.....?
 
Last edited:
KentBlue said:
Essentially, knighted despite his stupidity? What a wonderful country we have become: rewarded for imbecilic behaviour that causes you to lose your money. On that basis we should have Bodger and Badger running our treasury department.
Click to expand...
The current incumbents give them a good run for their money.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
Apparently they sang it at Tevez when he left. That didn’t end well!
Click to expand...
Yeah they just rehashed the Tevez song. Whilst we can all look back and laugh at that, at the time, it was at least something that made sense to sing. We were on the rise but hadn't won anything as of yet and they were still winning league titles. Whereas now, they're singing it after finishing 14th to a guy that's joined the club world cup champions.
 
What the actual fuck is this? Even by rag standards this is weird. Old school fan meets new social media one I guess.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top