As I've said on a number of occasions, usually to a chorus of wailing and gnashing of teeth from the usual suspects, if reasonable people's reasonable demands are not dealt with reasonably, they'll be dealt with unreasonably.
So now they're going to be dealt with unreasonably.
The gap between what was said and what was done has grown too wide, so a sizeable number of Brits have given up on the talking heads in the establishment parties, particularly as the party in power is still talking absolute bollocks. Combating ethno nationalism does not start well when a British Citizen, our Home Secretary, a woman who celebrates her proud Asian origins, declares herself English or with David Lammy who calls himself English while in parallel has campaigned for reparation for "his" people. That way English ethnicity becomes so broad, so all encompassing, that Friday's attack in Manchester can only be described as English on English violence.
Ethnicity can, but does not necessarily lead to ethno nationalism. But the way to combat ethno nationalism does not start with the selective eradication of English ethnicity, the majority ethnicity, or its redefinition so broad as to render it meaningless, while simultaneously ring fencing and celebrating ethnic minority identities. This cunning wheeze dreamt up around an Islington dinner table has run its course.
It is not racist to declare that English ethnicity exists, or French ethnicity, or German or Spanish ethnicity for that matter, and that these categories include some people and exclude others, that is the truth that dare not speak its name in liberal left circles, hence....
I repeat....We live in a multi ethic country, but that phrase becomes meaningless if the majority ethnicity is redefined by the powers that be into meaninglessness. Coz when you do that you leave the field open to the two fuckers above to define it for us.