United Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
BlueHammer85 said:
Fair enough, I don’t see it personally, I watch loads of prem games and see some teams get some slight favourable decisions go there way at times but I don’t see any conspiracy.
Click to expand...

Slightly

1000028784.jpg


Only one way Rashford isn't interfering with play a bent ref or bent var. I can't remember var reason for allowing this goal.

Rashford was a yard off side, ran after the ball blocking the defender and allowing Eddy to set himself for a Rashford shot. How the fuck can Rashford not be interfering ?
 
give it to gordon said:
Slightly

View attachment 171747


Only one way Rashford isn't interfering with play a bent ref or bent var. I can't remember var reason for allowing this goal.

Rashford was a yard off side, ran after the ball blocking the defender and allowing Eddy to set himself for a Rashford shot. How the fuck can Rashford not be interfering ?
Click to expand...

Yes , that was farcical , ridiculous decision and a cock up from officials.

I can point to loads of farcical decisions that have gone in favour or against pretty much every PL team in recent years - especially West Ham , clearly a agenda against us.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
Yes , that was farcical , ridiculous decision and a cock up from officials.

I can point to loads of farcical decisions that have gone in favour or against pretty much every PL team in recent years - especially West Ham , clearly a agenda against us.
Click to expand...

But var is to stop farcical decisions. He was clearly interfering there is absolutely no legal way it could be ruled not to be interfering.
 
give it to gordon said:
But var is to stop farcical decisions. He was clearly interfering there is absolutely no legal way it could be ruled not to be interfering.
Click to expand...

It has and will reduce farcical decisions but they will still happen and my god we won’t hear the end when it’s against someone’s own team. It will never eradicate bad decisions , I’ve always said that.

What it has done is highlighted how many blatant offside goals would have stood without var , how many red card offences would have been unpunished, how many goals should not have stood. But of course, highlighting any positives is a no go.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
It has and will reduce farcical decisions but they will still happen and my god we won’t hear the end when it’s against someone’s own team. It will never eradicate bad decisions , I’ve always said that.

What it has done is highlighted how many blatant offside goals would have stood without var , how many red card offences would have been unpunished, how many goals should not have stood. But of course, highlighting any positives is a no go.
Click to expand...

In my mind they is absolutely no reason to allow that Rashford off side decision. It is impossible not to rule it off side nothing. Impossible to say he wasn't interfering.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
Yes , that was farcical , ridiculous decision and a cock up from officials.

I can point to loads of farcical decisions that have gone in favour or against pretty much every PL team in recent years - especially West Ham , clearly a agenda against us.
Click to expand...
Fine, then please provide an example of an equally "farcical and ridiculous" decision that has gone against united.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
Fair enough, I don’t see it personally, I watch loads of prem games and see some teams get some slight favourable decisions go there way at times but I don’t see any conspiracy.
Click to expand...
You'll notice it when you watch the rags, Liverpool or Arsenal games.

You will never see a player of one of the above clubs getting booked in the opponents eighteen yard box for simulation.

The VAR team may overturn a penalty shout for them but the player won't pick up a booking for being the cheating bastard they are.

Watch how many defenders give away free kicks for marking the striker too tight while he's trying to hold the ball up, then watch how Haaland gets marked almost every game and nothing is given.
 
give it to gordon said:
Slightly

View attachment 171747


Only one way Rashford isn't interfering with play a bent ref or bent var. I can't remember var reason for allowing this goal.

Rashford was a yard off side, ran after the ball blocking the defender and allowing Eddy to set himself for a Rashford shot. How the fuck can Rashford not be interfering ?
Click to expand...
The main isue with this is that Attwell overuled his linesman who correctly flagged offside after Rashford shielded the ball for 30 yards. And then he didn't even bother looking at the screen. Of course the tape of the conversations has never been revealed.
 
Paul lakes knee said:
Rejoice!
View attachment 171769
Click to expand...
Sky Sports are currently doing a “special” on this complete with wheeling out Louis not seen the **** for 20 years Saha to give his “expert insight”.

Sky saying the rags are 1.2 billion in debt. The financial rules they invented to nobble us, biting them on the arse.

And now the rags think 3 more years of Ruben Neverwins is a good shout.

This is the best news we’ve had for fucking years.
 
Stoned Rose said:
Sky Sports are currently doing a “special” on this complete with wheeling out Louis not seen the **** for 20 years Saha to give his “expert insight”.

Sky saying the rags are 1.2 billion in debt. The financial rules they invented to nobble us, biting them on the arse.

And now the rags think 3 more years of Ruben Neverwins is a good shout.

This is the best news we’ve had for fucking years.
Click to expand...
Is it because scruffy Jim can’t afford to sack AMoron?
 
Stoned Rose said:
Sky Sports are currently doing a “special” on this complete with wheeling out Louis not seen the **** for 20 years Saha to give his “expert insight”.

Sky saying the rags are 1.2 billion in debt. The financial rules they invented to nobble us, biting them on the arse.

And now the rags think 3 more years of Ruben Neverwins is a good shout.

This is the best news we’ve had for fucking years.
Click to expand...
Great to see Ratcliffe citing Arteta as a reason to stick with Amorim - United fans must love hearing that that's the standard they're hoping to emulate :-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top