The Labour Government

Brewster's millions said:
I’m just interested on your opinion on the matter, because you appear to hold strong views on how much money people should have, as well as unearned income and the ‘idle rich’. Or did yesterday in any case, before this story broke.

If the rental income covers her mortgage on the property, and given the other properties that she has available to her for free, then surely a good compromise would be to cap her other income at say £40k a year.

I mean, how does anyone with no housing costs need an income of £40k?
Click to expand...
It's bad enough another poster making stuff up about my views without your making more stuff up based on his made-up stuff.

I'll give you some a bonus point if you know what Southwark mean in their determination order by "Paragraph 5(f): Exempted tenancies or licences, Selective Licensing of Houses (Specified Exemptions) (England) Order 2006".
 
hilts said:
If it wears a red rosette its kind of like a free pass, think of it as diplomatic immunity in your own country.
Click to expand...
And here's someone else making stuff up based on made-up stuff based on made-up stuff.
 
west didsblue said:
Rental agent has apologised for not applying for licence and for misleading the Chancellor. Don’t they know that BKB and its still her fault and should be sacked.
Click to expand...
Doesn’t actually make any odds.

Being under the impression that your legal requirement has been fulfilled isn’t the same as knowing that it has and actually fulfilling your legal requirements.

It was her responsibility to secure the license and she didn’t do it. As she herself has admitted.
 
Wait a minute, so they didn't know they had to apply for a licence but now they have just remembered the husband had an email saying the estate agent would sort it? Erm wouldn't that mean they did know?
 
Gaz76 said:
Wait a minute, so they didn't know they had to apply for a licence but now they have just remembered the husband had an email saying the estate agent would sort it? Erm wouldn't that mean they did know?
Click to expand...
They didn’t know they had to apply because the agent was going to on their behalf. Not too difficult to understand
 
Gaz76 said:
Wait a minute, so they didn't know they had to apply for a licence but now they have just remembered the husband had an email saying the estate agent would sort it? Erm wouldn't that mean they did know?
Click to expand...
It means that her story has changed completely from what she said in her letter last night.

Last night, she said that ‘Regrettably, we were not aware that a licence was necessary, and so we did not obtain the licence before letting the property out’.

Now she’s saying that they were in fact told a license was required, and that that they were under the impression that this had been done for them.

It’s quite the difference isn’t it? It’s good to see that her customary attention to detail has been deployed to full effect here!
 
It’s all good and well rolling out a statement from another party absolving you and saying they made the mistake but it’s still an issue when it completely blows your own statement made just 24 hours earlier.
 
blueinsa said:
It’s all good and well rolling out a statement from another party absolving you and saying they made the mistake but it’s still an issue when it completely blows your own statement made just 24 hours earlier.
Click to expand...
Just makes her look even more incompetent.

Sending an official letter to the PM and the ethics advisor based on an entirely false version of events, and then having to do a complete 180 on it not even 24 hours later.

Really, really poor.
 
mosssideblue said:
8.5 years
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
mosssideblue said:
Who else is there?
Click to expand...
We’re in weird times. Super-majorities can swing, so there should be no complacency.

At the moment, only Reform seem to be up for the challenge, but they have a ceiling, so as long as this government don’t do utterly crazy things and start making people feel better off by 2029, you are probably right.

A competent Tory that wants to unite the country may appear too. Unlikely, but technically possible.
 
You'd think with Rachel and her husbands combined incomes plus their rental income coming in at north of £400k they could employ someone as a PA to handle all this kind of stuff and avoid any unfortunate "oversights"
 
Ah well, that looks like the latest Labour scandal has been suitably cleared up whitewashed

I wonder what the next one will be before the trial of those two very attractive looking young Ukranian men charged with fire bombing Sir Keirs front door and a car he previously owned.

I'm very curious to know what personal beef the two very attractive young Ukrainian men had with Sir Keir to make them carry out such an act... and how the two attractive young Ukrainian men knew his address and knew which car he used to drive.

I'm sure the truth will all come out and it won't be in any way whatsoever be covered up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top