Liverpool Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
bitterblue78 said:
Their crying. Goal should of stood etc etc
Click to expand...
If I were them I'd be more concerned about that performance and their inconsistencies this season, especially with the money they spent in the summer.

However, it's the dippers we're talking about here and they've never been known for their honest and balanced assessments.
 
Poor effort for reigning champions. Theyve got virtually a fully fit squad too. Said elsewhwre already but Salah looked woeful, I likened him to walker in his last months, seems like a liability, vvd isnt much further behind him either. Wirtz's anonymity is almost impressive. He has to play centrally but the dippers have to play a workman 3 man midfield to stand a chance. There probably is a way of getting him in the team and performing but he looks like a total mismatch signing right now. Ekitike is their only signing who has made a decent Impact and slot takes him off, they'll end up losing him trying to force Isak and Wirtz to work.
 
alexmcity said:
They shouldn't be written off. Liverpool were poor in the first half of 21/22 but then won 51 from 57 points in the 2nd half of the season and we needed wonders from Gundo to win the title.

We are better, though :)
Click to expand...
That was a Klopp's Liverpool team in 21/22 season.

This is a very different proposition for Slot. Slot won the title last season with Klopp's team and with very little challenges from MCFC or anyone else, I might add.

What we're seeing with this new Liverpool team is Slot doesn't trust his new signings and the players don't seem to like each other.

VVD is supposed to be their captain and leader but he spends most of his games pointing at other players and scowling at them.

The whole balance is fucked up at that club. If Slot doesn't get his shit together quickly they'll finish below the rags this season and that will be a piss poor way to defend your title.
 


People will probably need this to send to any scousers they have the misfortune of knowing.

Subjective offside, given as offside onfield. VAR then looked and applied the law and the call could be deemed to be correct.

As with all subjective calls, they can be viewed differently and different people can come to what they perceive to be correct.

Had the onfield call been a goal, I doubt it’d have been overturned. Linesman’s a legend.

Unlucky dippers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top