KentBlue
Well-Known Member
Something I have been pissed off about from the off.
If and when are we going to get this 'independent body' I often hear bandied about?
Liverpool Thread | 2025/26
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
If and when are we going to get this 'independent body' I often hear bandied about?
Typical Webb trying to spoil all our fun.
I don't give a shit whether in was offside, onside or even top side, I am just enjoying the dipper and media melt down. Both are showing themselves up and it is hilarious
KentBlue
Well-Known Member
But fucking Sly are are to blame for behaving like they are the aggrieved party. They are so far up the dippers arses it's untrue. If it had been any other club than us, rags, gooners, chavs, there would be nowhere near the outcry Sly are forcing onto the world.No wonder, the media are whipping up the liverpool fans into a frenzy... Quite ridiculous Sky Sports front page right now
Liverpool disallowed goal vs Man City: Howard Webb says 'not unreasonable' to rule out Virgil van Dijk header
Virgil van Dijks header was disallowed for offside on Andy Robertson in Liverpools 3-0 defeat at Manchester City; Liverpool contacted the PGMOL over decision; Arne Slot compared the incident to Man Citys winner at Wolves last season, but Howard Webb says there is a clear differencewww.skysports.com
Manchester City vs Liverpool: Virgil van Dijk goal analysed after release of referee's audio
Listen to the audio of Virgil van Dijks goal against Manchester City being disallowed. Speaking on Match Officials Micd Up, PGMOL chief Howard Webb explains why VAR did not intervene to overturn the decision.
Manchester City vs Liverpool: Ref Watch analyses Virgil van Dijk disallowed goal
Virgil van Dijks header against Manchester City was disallowed for offside but should it have stood? Ref Watch takes a closer look.
Liverpool contact PGMOL over Virgil van Dijk's disallowed goal in Man City defeat to raise significant concerns
Virgil van Dijks header would have brought Liverpool level at Man City but was ruled out with Andy Robertson judged to be impeding goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma from an offside position in the 3-0 defeat at Man City; Liverpool accept the result of the game but feel a mistake was made
That club are embarrassing
And STILL Blues subscribe to that odious fucking broadcasting unit - unbelievable, Jeff.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,769
Thought Webb spoke well. He dangled enough bait for the victims to continue their fume.
The match officials were pretty concise in coming to the decision.
Goal still won’t count, whatever they demand.
No wonder, the media are whipping up the liverpool fans into a frenzy... Quite ridiculous Sky Sports front page right now
Liverpool disallowed goal vs Man City: Howard Webb says 'not unreasonable' to rule out Virgil van Dijk header
Virgil van Dijks header was disallowed for offside on Andy Robertson in Liverpools 3-0 defeat at Manchester City; Liverpool contacted the PGMOL over decision; Arne Slot compared the incident to Man Citys winner at Wolves last season, but Howard Webb says there is a clear difference
Manchester City vs Liverpool: Virgil van Dijk goal analysed after release of referee's audio
Listen to the audio of Virgil van Dijks goal against Manchester City being disallowed. Speaking on Match Officials Micd Up, PGMOL chief Howard Webb explains why VAR did not intervene to overturn the decision.
Manchester City vs Liverpool: Ref Watch analyses Virgil van Dijk disallowed goal
Virgil van Dijks header against Manchester City was disallowed for offside but should it have stood? Ref Watch takes a closer look.
Liverpool contact PGMOL over Virgil van Dijk's disallowed goal in Man City defeat to raise significant concerns
Virgil van Dijks header would have brought Liverpool level at Man City but was ruled out with Andy Robertson judged to be impeding goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma from an offside position in the 3-0 defeat at Man City; Liverpool accept the result of the game but feel a mistake was made
That club are embarrassing
They (Liverpool) 100% know what they are doing, asking all the media outlets to put the pressure on and highlight it to the highest levels so Liverpool will get the rest of this season's close VAR decisions in their favour, 100% they will get every close call going for them, even goals that should be crossed off will stand or not even checked
surprisedbygrass
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2024
- Messages
- 609
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Michael Owen , that well known neutral , asking the questions straight out of the Liverpool appeal to PGMOL .
How can you say a player is not interfering in with play when he has to literally duck to get out of the flight of a ball a yard in front of the goalkeeper ?
TBH I think the post match manager interview is cat nip to the broadcasters . It takes about an hour minimum to calm down after you've lost a game , especially when you've given your team a bollocking which is likely what Slott did . So you' re up for a fight and in defence mode and seething but trying to suppress it . Best tactic is deflection to avoid saying something wreckless ( unless you're Tuchal who just has no filter ). Probably the only effective decision Slott made all afternoon was to gripe about the disallowed goal thus supercharging the debate .
Point is we spanked them . They had one shot on target . One shot. End of .
How can you say a player is not interfering in with play when he has to literally duck to get out of the flight of a ball a yard in front of the goalkeeper ?
TBH I think the post match manager interview is cat nip to the broadcasters . It takes about an hour minimum to calm down after you've lost a game , especially when you've given your team a bollocking which is likely what Slott did . So you' re up for a fight and in defence mode and seething but trying to suppress it . Best tactic is deflection to avoid saying something wreckless ( unless you're Tuchal who just has no filter ). Probably the only effective decision Slott made all afternoon was to gripe about the disallowed goal thus supercharging the debate .
Point is we spanked them . They had one shot on target . One shot. End of .
69FACUPfinal
Well-Known Member
You are so right. I just text my mate who goes regularly and said same to her. They will be planning it now.
Vienna_70
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 45,126
- Location
- 100, 32, 106, +79, 19
- Team supported
- Treble Winners 2022/23.
There’s nothing more enjoyable than a laugh at one (or more) of the red shirt cartel clubs that think they have been done an injustice.
And this is really enjoyable.
Schadenfreude is the perfect word for it.
cleavers
Moderator
Aye, but it's also amusing that webb is pissing on their chips too.
Vienna_70
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 45,126
- Location
- 100, 32, 106, +79, 19
- Team supported
- Treble Winners 2022/23.
Michael "boring" Owen, a former Littlewoods player, thinks the goal should have stood?
Well, there’s a shock!
The main message to the victims is ‘so fucking what’
Fuck off and cry!
I would appeal of course .. parliament, court of human rights, maybe NATO, trump and who ever they want.. they got beaten, battered, shit on and lost.
So dippers.. fuck right off.
Johnnyblue7
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2021
- Messages
- 116
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,769
Best thing is, they’ve got 2 weeks to stew on it.
Have they contacted the Dalai Lama yet?
JRockBlues
Well-Known Member
Djibrilshairdo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2018
- Messages
- 4,001
Another inquest, public enquiry and politicians select committee over a decision that went against the dippers. They never give up and media doesn’t change. Just get on with it you mard cunts.
Calling @Ric to the thread....they are all picking on me....it's not fair!
Whilst I obviously see it slightly differently from many of you, in that I thought the "goal" should have stood. I cannot see any mileage in complaining to PGMOL. It did nothing for us a couple of seasons ago, did nothing for Forest or Wolves and will never do anything to change any game after the fact. So, why bother?
Bottom line is that our "mini revival", was short lived, with the Villa & RM games hiding our deficiencies. As was pointed out Salah has dropped off a cliff form wise and perhaps his soon to be disappearance to AFCON could be the break that he and the team need. City thoroughly deserved the win and its down to Slot to prove his worth now and fix the problems that are obviously there. He has to change something and I hope he isn't as stubborn as Postecoglu or Martin in the past and make the changes needed.
Afraid that an apology won't help my acca that crashed and cost me £300 (possibly) by us not scoring.
Whilst I obviously see it slightly differently from many of you, in that I thought the "goal" should have stood. I cannot see any mileage in complaining to PGMOL. It did nothing for us a couple of seasons ago, did nothing for Forest or Wolves and will never do anything to change any game after the fact. So, why bother?
Bottom line is that our "mini revival", was short lived, with the Villa & RM games hiding our deficiencies. As was pointed out Salah has dropped off a cliff form wise and perhaps his soon to be disappearance to AFCON could be the break that he and the team need. City thoroughly deserved the win and its down to Slot to prove his worth now and fix the problems that are obviously there. He has to change something and I hope he isn't as stubborn as Postecoglu or Martin in the past and make the changes needed.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,217
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Bet your life that there will be no questions raised about this relationship which exists, despite the PL paying the employer of PiGMOL officials.
Conflict of interests ? Convenient if trying to excuse the strange decisions which occur in certain games, some might believe that the relationship could lead to collusion between the two parties ?
Pressure by certain clubs to try and engineer results as a consequence of their complaints perhaps - by using the media to publicly highlight decisions which didn't go in their favour ?
Surely no self-respecting and prominent club would resort to such underhand tactics ?
But, I'm sure the leading officials from the PL and PiGMOL hierarchies will be only too happy to reassure us that there is nothing for us to be concerned about - due to them upholding the strong principles of honesty and integrity.
Please mind the rocking horse shit gentlemen.