hampshireblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 2,976
I said:You’re happy to quote the figure as fact, that Brexit has resulted in a conveniently large, round number hit to the fiscal position, but you don’t know anything about the paper, the authors, or the assumptions behind it.
But you still assume it’s correct, and quote it as a fact.
If only we weren't upto £90bn a year worse off.
Upto is not a fact, it's a range. As in you could win upto £10m on the lottery, not £10m exactly (but it could be)-upto.
You really are a pedantic prick sometimes and despite your BKB tag, not always right.
But here's the opening statement. I'll leave you to challenge the assumptions so you can put your fRW spin on it to justify to yourself that you're in now way to blame for the mess we are in:
This paper examines the impact of the UK's decision to leave the European Union (Brexit) in 2016. Using almost a decade of data since the referendum, we combine simulations based on macro data with estimates derived from micro data collected through our Decision Maker Panel survey. These estimates suggest that by 2025, Brexit had reduced UK GDP by 6% to 8%, with the impact accumulating gradually over time. We estimate that investment was reduced by between 12% and 18%, employment by 3% to 4% and productivity by 3% to 4%. These large negative impacts reflect a combination of elevated uncertainty, reduced demand, diverted management time, and increased misallocation of resources from a protracted Brexit process. Comparing these with contemporary forecasts – providing a rare macro example to complement the burgeoning micro-literature of social science predictions – shows that these forecasts were accurate over a 5-year horizon, but they underestimated the impact over a decade.
Last edited:
