west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 34,052
Won’t need it. He’ll probably get a bung from Elon Musk.There will be a Go Fund Me appeal any day now……..
Won’t need it. He’ll probably get a bung from Elon Musk.There will be a Go Fund Me appeal any day now……..
Are there any redeeming features on Barton,
What if those upsetting thoughts resulted in physical harm to those insulted?The man is an enormous bellend but let’s have it right, posting a few upsetting personal thoughts on the internet should not be an issue for Courts. Do they not having anything more important to be doing?
Not sure what you mean mate?What if those upsetting thoughts resulted in physical harm to those insulted?
If you take a step back and view it through the prism of hate speech on the internet, then maybe there should be a clampdown on someone in the public eye that hopefully will make all the keyboard warriors think twice.The man is an enormous bellend but let’s have it right, posting a few upsetting personal thoughts on the internet should not be an issue for Courts. Do they not having anything more important to be doing?
I understand the point you’re making mate but they’ve hardly “clamped down” on him. He’s been given a suspended. Won’t be getting bummed in HMP whilst his liberty is restricted. It’s a “stop being naughty” slap on the wrist.If you take a step back and view it through the prism of hate speech on the internet, then maybe there should be a clampdown on someone in the public eye that hopefully will make all the keyboard warriors think twice.
Also what could be more important than legally kicking Barton in the slats and then again in the head when he dropped to his knees. The bloke is a bully.
Just because one reads a book about philosophy, it really doesn't equate to said person being an actual philosopher.
As we've seen in places like the USA, often what people say on the internet often leads to physical violence against those targeted.The man is an enormous bellend but let’s have it right, posting a few upsetting personal thoughts on the internet should not be an issue for Courts. Do they not have anything more important to be doing?
Whilst it might just be harmful words, it may incite nutters into taking actionNot sure what you mean mate?
“Often”? Not sure that’s the case mate. There are millions of messages posted on the internet every day, not sure they lead to violence “often”.As we've seen in places like the USA, often what people say on the internet often leads to physical violence against those targeted.
It could but we have to be sensible here mate.Whilst it might just be harmful words, it may incite nutters into taking action
No, but if he had half a million followers that read everything he posted and he called you a paedophile, you might think differently.It could but we have to be sensible here mate.
If you called me an idiot on this thread and I got offended and then went out and stabbed someone because I was upset would it be your fault? Would you deserve to go to prison?
More than once is often enough. Barton's conviction sets an example. Hopefully it will have the desired effect, in the UK at least.“Often”? Not sure that’s the case mate. There are millions of messages posted on the internet every day, note sure they lead to violence often.
If I called you a pedo and then a gang decided to kick the shit out of you, should I be blamed?It could but we have to be sensible here mate.
If you called me an idiot on this thread and I got offended and then went out and stabbed someone because I was upset would it be your fault? Would you deserve to go to prison?
Mate you know as well as me it won’t make the slightest bit of difference.More than once is often enough. Barton's conviction sets an example. Hopefully it will have the desired effect, in the UK at least.
![]()
Attack on Paul Pelosi - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
MTG accuses Trump of ‘fueling’ death threats against her son by calling her traitor
Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene tells 60 Minutes she blames President Donald Trump after receiving a pipe bomb threat at her home in first major interview about imminent departure from Congresswww.the-independent.com
That's how Sky news were reporting it.Was a Liverpool Echo article on socials earlier saying ‘ex Manchester City player’!
Yes, but only for passing on a ridiculous and inaccurate message. Let’s be honest here, passing on ridiculous and inaccurate information happens millions of times a day, in person and online, and no one shits their knickers about it.If I called you a pedo and then a gang decided to kick the shit out of you, should I be blamed?