the BBC asked him wear specs to make himself look more intelligent - should have tried a bag
View attachment 177612
the BBC asked him wear specs to make himself look more intelligent - should have tried a bag
View attachment 177612
Keep up the good work. Had a couple taken down alsoIt's bizarre just got another 1 taken down. Strange behaviour from the bbc lol
I thought so at first, but Nico O might have been playing him on on the far sideIt was funny when they made a fuss of the Palace player who hit the bar claiming it was a close chance but they went silent when the replay showed he was clearly well offside so any goal would have been ruled out. In fact City were superb defensively today with their offside trap cutting out the Palace counter attacks all game. And Palace walked straight into the trap.
Too much positivity?What the hell is going on at the bbc ? I have got 11 post taken down on our match report.
Too much positivity?
Maybe, just maybe, City have had a quiet word, along rhe lines of enough is enough.What the hell is going on at the bbc ? I have got 11 post taken down on our match report.
Maybe, just maybe, City have had a quiet word, along rhe lines of enough is enough.
If the bbc print a post that is libelous they can be sued.
Daaa-daa-da-dathe BBC asked him wear specs to make himself look more intelligent - should have tried a gag
View attachment 177612
That's my point. In the past they have ignored complaints and ignored libelous posts. If City have had a word they could perhaps allow a libelous post claiming they hadn't seen it but once it's pointed out, that defence is gone.Bbc are allowing the posts until its pointed out to them ! But the bbc normally leave the post on the site
ditto.The Mother in law gets that rag and I despair at its content.
I'm banned completely twice.What the hell is going on at the bbc ? I have got 11 post taken down on our match report.
Even today it was mentioned that Alfies lad had only touched the ball 9 times. It seemed an after thought to mention that one of them was the goal !Anybody any idea how many touches Isak has been averaging per Liverppol game..?
Or Wirtz, cone to that...?
Funny how the meedja aren't all over those figures.
And not just once, they went on and on and on about it.Even today it was mentioned that Alfies hlad had only touched the ball 9 times. It seemed an after thought to mention that one of them was the goal !
It’s getting out of hand now,trying to justify oh he does nothing only had 9 touches,part of it is jealousy and the desire to see us lose,he could have 6 touches in a game and score 4 goals yet they’d still be complaining its crazy,his job is to put the ball in the net they seem to think if he’s not busting a gut for 90 mins it’s no good..Even today it was mentioned that Alfies hlad had only touched the ball 9 times. It seemed an after thought to mention that one of them was the goal !
he's still no darwinIt’s getting out of hand now,trying to justify oh he does nothing only had 9 touches,part of it is jealousy and the desire to see us lose,he could have 6 touches in a game and score 4 goals yet they’d still be complaining its crazy,his job is to put the ball in the net they seem to think if he’s not busting a gut for 90 mins it’s no good..
Even today it was mentioned that Alfies hlad had only touched the ball 9 times. It seemed an after thought to mention that one of them was the goal !
Yes he did but the point we are all making is no other player has his touches added up as the game progresses and used as a way to attack him.I think Murray said he'd be pretty happy if that was him!