Media discussion - 2025/26

WesthoughtonJohn said:
Wasted time.
Of the 14 listed games Stretford were involved in 6 (one of which was a 5-0 dry bumming by Newcastle - hardly what I'd describe as "one of the best"), Li"var"pool 4, Le Arse 4.
We get mentioned twice - one involving Stretford (unsurprisingly neither the 1-6 or 6-3 - no, no the 4-3 at the swamp when they scored in the added on, added on time)
But NO bias exists whatsoever \O/
Edit: no mention of Stretford v Everton 4-4 in 2012 you'll notice, or our 3-3 v Sunderland that same year
Click to expand...
Had a great day in thr boozer for rhat rag capitulation against Everton
 
TShed said:
Ffs some women other than slime ball is now running feature articles on BBC a load of Fukin shite about how hurt rat face was when he believed the rags would happily off load him ffs whose Fukin interested

I keep forgetting this is supposed to be a national impartial organisation

As a City fan I can kind of laugh at how pathetic they are but I wonder what other fan groups think especially PL whenever they open the app your hit with at least 2 features a day not to mention the “Gossip” area where every Fukin rumour has Manchester Fukin united referenced as an interested party
Click to expand...
That Trump law suit won't pay for itself you know!
 
TShed said:
Ffs some women other than slime ball is now running feature articles on BBC a load of Fukin shite about how hurt rat face was when he believed the rags would happily off load him ffs whose Fukin interested

I keep forgetting this is supposed to be a national impartial organisation

As a City fan I can kind of laugh at how pathetic they are but I wonder what other fan groups think especially PL whenever they open the app your hit with at least 2 features a day not to mention the “Gossip” area where every Fukin rumour has Manchester Fukin united referenced as an interested party
Click to expand...

Always the BBC reporting rags interested in such & such top player….top players want CL football so why would any top player want to go to the rags other than for £££?
 
Wardley Blue said:
I have been saying from the start that unless you can see the line drawn straight across the pitch from the side then it is open to manipulation. Is this why it takes so long to produce the image?
Click to expand...

I don't know. I don't think this is any kind of official image used by VAR, more of something the BBC had knocked up for their highlights show. Probably by the work experience kid by the looks of it. They probably stuck the line in, thought it looked about right and it served a purpose for their 'analysis'.

Really though, if the line angles a bit further right at the bottom, the guy would be shown to be clearly offside im sure.
 
Last edited:
heslops barnet said:
Always the BBC reporting rags interested in such & such top player….top players want CL football so why would any top player want to go to the rags other than for £££?
Click to expand...
Most so called “top players” already there are like beached whales
Found themselves in their own worst nightmares landing at the worlds greatest club to quickly realise it’s a charade and can’t escape

Very similar to holidaying at Portmeirion

You end up being only a number lol
 
Just watching Sky with Dean Ashton wetting himself over Bruno Fernandes. Apparently according to Dean he ranks alongside Kevin de B as one of the Premier League all time greats. No mention of the fact that he disappears in every big game and Bournemouth is the ideal opposition/ level for him
 
Fifa team 9f the year

Liverpool's Virgil van Dijk and Chelsea's Cole Palmer were the only representatives who played in the Premier League last term.

The players selected were Gianluigi Donnarumma (PSG/Man City), Achraf Hakimi (PSG), Willian Pacho (PSG), Virgil van Dijk (Liverpool), Nuno Mendes (PSG), Cole Palmer (Chelsea), Jude Bellingham (Real Madrid), Vitinha (PSG), Pedri (Barcelona), Lamine Yamal (Barcelona) and Ousmane Dembele (PSG).
 
Wardley Blue said:
I have been saying from the start that unless you can see the line drawn straight across the pitch from the side then it is open to manipulation. Is this why it takes so long to produce the image?
Click to expand...
I have heard that the line we see on the TV is done by the TV company, and is not the one the VAR uses, they have their own equipment. Whether there’s is any better I don’t know!
 
mattcity5 said:
I don't know. I don't think this is any kind of official image used by VAR, more of something the BBC had knocked up for their highlights show. Probably by the work experience kid by the looks of it. They probably stuck the line in, thought it looked about right and it served a purpose for their 'analysis'.

Really though, if the line angles a bit further right at the bottom, the guy would be shown to be clearly offside im sure.
Click to expand...
I can never understand why that camera on wires above the pitch is never used for off-sides (or any other decision, for that matter), you'd get a perfect plan view of any incident.
 
Earlyriser said:
Just watching Sky with Dean Ashton wetting himself over Bruno Fernandes. Apparently according to Dean he ranks alongside Kevin de B as one of the Premier League all time greats. No mention of the fact that he disappears in every big game and Bournemouth is the ideal opposition/ level for him
Click to expand...
workaday footballer takes sky cash to tow the line as needs the money, same shit different day. Fernandes doesnt get into the top 20 mfs of all time in the pl never mind rank alongside kev.

Kev, david silva, yaya, gundogan, gareth barry, ferna, foden were/are all better mfs than ratboy and thats only the ones that played for us there is plenty more at other clubs.
 
mancboy said:
workaday footballer takes sky cash to tow the line as needs the money, same shit different day. Fernandes doesnt get into the top 20 mfs of all time in the pl never mind rank alongside kev.

Kev, david silva, yaya, gundogan, gareth barry, ferna, foden were/are all better mfs than ratboy and thats only the ones that played for us there is plenty more at other clubs.
Click to expand...
You've forgotten about the "This is manchester united we are talking about' factor.
(and no need to call them all mother fuckers).
 
WesthoughtonJohn said:
Wasted time.
Of the 14 listed games Stretford were involved in 6 (one of which was a 5-0 dry bumming by Newcastle - hardly what I'd describe as "one of the best"), Li"var"pool 4, Le Arse 4.
We get mentioned twice - one involving Stretford (unsurprisingly neither the 1-6 or 6-3 - no, no the 4-3 at the swamp when they scored in the added on, added on time)
But NO bias exists whatsoever \O/
Edit: no mention of Stretford v Everton 4-4 in 2012 you'll notice, or our 3-3 v Sunderland that same year
Click to expand...
The fools seem to believe that a lot of goals equals the best games. Only a fucking idiot would compile a list of the best ever Premier League matches and not include us beating Liverpool 2-1 in 2019.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top