Exactlysaid before theres no chip in the ball so still use best frame for off or on side
adidas wouldnt sell technology
Hinchcliffe was horrendous as usual, you are the exception if you look at the match day threadYes I agree but there was one moment in the first half when NOR, Savinho and a couple of other blues used some intricate footwork when hemmed in to beat the Brentford press and the commentator did marvel at how it was done.
I actually didn't think Hinchcliffe was too bad!
I missed most of the 1st half he summarised "Man city end the half with JUST 0.2 XG and only lead through a moment of brilliance from Cherki ".....as Im watching the ht highlights I thought wtf he going on about Ive just seen 4 shots on targetHinchcliffe was horrendous as usual, you are the exception if you look at the match day thread
How many times did they mention that Kush should have had a red, the commentators finished his commentary with it.
I know. Also, no mention of a 19-yr old academy player getting a cameo appearance being the 5th first team debutant for City this season from our academy.Why we allow the BBC inside the grounds if baffling. They run the Trafford story often after he plays for us and that headline inc a red, what a laugh. Dont recall should we have had a penalty in the headline when ee got robbed at Newcastle. Even after a win with so many academy players on the pitch, the BBC has to run with negatives.
both of them spent the 2nd half full of what ifs , no other side gets so much negative commentary like we doHinchcliffe was horrendous as usual, you are the exception if you look at the match day thread
How many times did they mention that Kush should have had a red, the commentators finished his commentary with it.
I'd be interested to know why Hinchcliffe, as an ex blue, seems to go out of his way to be totally the opposite of biased towards us. It's not just last night, it's a theme with him. He rarely has a good word to say about the players, team or club. I wonder if he had issues with the club, feels he missed out on some of our success since he left, or actively tries not to be accused of just being an ex biased city player.Hinchcliffe was horrendous as usual, you are the exception if you look at the match day thread
How many times did they mention that Kush should have had a red, the commentators finished his commentary with it.
It's not just city who he's negative about, every game he co comms on he's a right whining negative fucker.I'd be interested to know why Hinchcliffe, as an ex blue, seems to go out of his way to be totally the opposite of biased towards us. It's not just last night, it's a theme with him. He rarely has a good word to say about the players, team or club. I wonder if he had issues with the club, feels he missed out on some of our success since he left, or actively tries not to be accused of just being an ex biased city player.
You would think Hinchcliffe would trot out the number of City FA Youth Cup youngsters who he played with, when stuffing the Trafford Tramps.When the commentator mentioned the 5 academy starters last night there was tumbleweed from Hinchcliffe. It even a peep.
Well his negativity on most city games seems to be focused on us.It's not just city who he's negative about, every game he co comms on he's a right whining negative fucker.
And to think when I first started going in 1988 he was the first player I wanted to be being a left back myself for the local u10s.
I'd be interested to know why Hinchcliffe, as an ex blue, seems to go out of his way to be totally the opposite of biased towards us. It's not just last night, it's a theme with him. He rarely has a good word to say about the players, team or club. I wonder if he had issues with the club, feels he missed out on some of our success since he left, or actively tries not to be accused of just being an ex biased city player.
Said to the missus last night, these commentators really dig a dark hole for themselves these days.It was worth going to the game, just to avoid the commentary....very enjoyable evening despite the cold and wet . Should Have Done Better Hinchliffe is always negative but sounds like he excelled last night . And it really annoys me when commentators ignore the technical finesse of City in possession and tell us some irrelevant stat or overgeneralization All they want is route one and a goal in the counter so they can turn up the volume and exist on a clip on tic toc for generations .
What attack was this? Must have missed itHis attack on Bernie should never be forgiven.
Coz you know, xG is worthless bollocks.I missed most of the 1st half he summarised "Man city end the half with JUST 0.2 XG and only lead through a moment of brilliance from Cherki ".....as Im watching the ht highlights I thought wtf he going on about Ive just seen 4 shots on target
Always negative coverage from the biased BBC.
What attack was this? Must have missed it
Compare and contrast with the handball decision against Bournemouth on Monday. It was even more of a howler and changed the game. The commentators were so swept away with their love of all things Red that they barely mentioned it.Hinchcliffe was horrendous as usual, you are the exception if you look at the match day thread
How many times did they mention that Kush should have had a red, the commentators finished his commentary with it.
Once a Rag always a Rag (although Sky would never dream of putting him on one of their games)He made a big point of condemning Bernardo on live tv for his posting the cartoon to Mendy who found it funny. Without the pile on Bernardo wouldn’t have been banned, fined & required to attend education sessions.
He was fucking silent when Garnacho posted a gorilla to Onana.
Surprised they didn’t use a photo of our kit in their story about expensive football replica kits. The person who wrote it, Jane Dougall , is probably due a telling off for not showing our top.Always negative coverage from the biased BBC.