VAR Discussion Thread

KentBlue said:
I hear Simon (Wanker) Jordan has been giving Rodders some stick on Talk Shit again after he made a few comments. I'm so glad I don't listen or watch that perma-tanned prat, I'd end up smashing my TV.
Click to expand...
If more people stopped listening, they would have to sack him
 
bellsouth said:
If more people stopped listening, they would have to sack him
Click to expand...
We have a blue who sits alongside him from time to time who seems to get on with him fine and dandy.
Wouldn't surprise me if he joins in slagging the club off air.
 
Bluekiwi said:
Just read an article that Villa had a goal disallowed when VAR trawled back 13 seconds of play to find a reason to disallow their goal - the ball supposedly went out of play. Smacks of a concerted ploy by the PL / VAR to make sure that Arsenal win the title.
Click to expand...
Thought exactly that last night.

The lengths they go to for a decision they want.

We are "mico VAR'd" we don't stand a chance this season.
 
RobinHood said:
Going off at a tangent here, that's precisely why workaholic is an 'incorrect' word.
Click to expand...
That sort of stuff has always annoyed the hell out of me.
What's the point in having patterns of prefixes and suffixes and then "they" just make shit up like that which doesn't fit the patterns...

....and EVERYBODY just seems to accept it!?!

AAAAAARRRRGH!
Why?!?
JUST USE THE FUCKING PATTERNS! :)
(Breath into the bag, long deep breaths, slow down, concentrate on your breathing, calm down...etc...etc...:)

Used to get really worked up by shit like that as a kid :)

I've always been a "patterns person" and language ALWAYS fucked around with the patterns too much for my liking.
Numbers work so much more logically for me.
I'm much better now, thanks :)

Maybe there's some sort of "you can't fight the system" analogy in there that's applicable to VAR in what I've written, who knows :)
 
super_city_si said:
Just get fucking rid of it. We get shafted with it and without it. makes no difference. I dont need a 5 minute stoppage for a supposed professional referee to tell me what I'm seeing in numerous replays and slow motions is not what I'm seeing.

And that villa one was a fucking joke too.
Click to expand...
hmmmm City & Villa on the end of bad decisions - the two teams taking up the CL places that were bequeathed to the red shirts from day 1 of the competition.
 
citytill1die84 said:


Tottenham fan Jamie O'hara lol

Unbelievable.
Click to expand...

So he's watched it for 3 whole days now, and has now decided it's a legit goal. Fuck off.
Obviously it's a legit goal because it only took VAR 3 seconds to confirm this (bullshitting cnuts)

It's a foul any any other game not involving City.
It's as bad as all the other decisions against us in the last 4 weeks.
Every time there's a chance of cutting the deficit on Arsenal..... whoosh another controversy against us in 1 of our games.
It's blatant
 
Seems now if your in the middle of the park get a toe poke and kick through a player is now going to be allowed! These cunts are all on the payrol of the yanks who now running all the football
 
We need a sweepstake for Sunday.

How will City be shafted?
  1. Perfectly good goal for City ruled out due to an up until now never used law
  2. Shady goal by Liverpool given due to a rapid rule change
  3. An offside less than 5cm rules out City goal
  4. Liverpool goal more offside than point 3 but OK because within 5cm rule
  5. City player sent off for 2 innocuous tackles
  6. Liverpool player stays on pitch despite 4 studs up challenges in quick succession
  7. Foul in build up to a City goal
  8. Didn't even look at the build up to a Liverpool goal
  9. Get City's DM + 2 CBs on an early booking
  10. Don't book any Liverpool players until 93rd minute despite constant fouling
  11. All of the above.


Edit - Almost forgot - 12. Referee constantly in City's passing lines.
 
Last edited:
Gazza said:
We need a sweepstake for Sunday.

How will City be shafted?
  1. Perfectly good goal for City ruled out due to an up until now never used law
  2. Shady goal by Liverpool given due to a rapid rule change
  3. An offside less than 5cm rules out City goal
  4. Liverpool goal more offside than point 3 but OK because within 5cm rule
  5. City player sent off for 2 innocuous tackles
  6. Liverpool player stays on pitch despite 4 studs up challenges in quick succession
  7. Foul in build up to a City goal
  8. Didn't even look at the build up to a Liverpool goal
  9. Get City's DM + 2 CBs on an early booking
  10. Don't book any Liverpool players until 93rd minute despite constant fouling
  11. All of the above.
Click to expand...

I’ll have ten pounds on 11
 
KentBlue said:
I hear Simon (Wanker) Jordan has been giving Rodders some stick on Talk Shit again after he made a few comments. I'm so glad I don't listen or watch that perma-tanned prat, I'd end up smashing my TV.
Click to expand...
That twat needs laying out.
 
KentBlue said:
I hear Simon (Wanker) Jordan has been giving Rodders some stick on Talk Shit again after he made a few comments. I'm so glad I don't listen or watch that perma-tanned prat, I'd end up smashing my TV.
Click to expand...
It's no wonder the players go to media school to learn how to answer the press.
The media moan about the cliches and yes/no answers they get but when the players do answer with a bit of emotion they're all over them like vultures pecking at a carcase.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top