I don’t think there’s some secret, organised conspiracy against City, but I do think there’s something more subtle and systemic going on. If major media organisations are dominated by people who grew up supporting the old top four, that inevitably shapes the narratives that get repeated. Over time, those narratives turn into “common sense” — who the big clubs are, who is framed as heritage, and who is treated as an outsider or disruptor. That kind of bias doesn’t need coordination or intent, it just emerges from culture, incentives, and repetition.
Refs and VAR officials don’t operate in a vacuum either. They’re human, reputationally exposed, and fully aware of which decisions will dominate headlines and phone-ins for days. On top of that, it’s an open secret that some referees have supported old top-four clubs at various points in their lives, yet still officiate City games. Even if you believe they’re trying to be neutral, the combination of personal background, media pressure, and asymmetrical outrage means marginal calls can drift towards the least controversial outcome without anyone consciously deciding to favour anyone. That’s not the same as institutional bias or fixing, but it is systemic pressure — and for City fans it feels sharper because City disrupted the old hierarchy without the historical goodwill the media still trades in. The frustration isn’t paranoia, it’s the result of watching an inconsistent system that rarely explains itself or holds itself properly to account.