Media discussion - 2025/26

Definitely a media campaign to undermine Pep and drive him out. It is everyday now listing managers who will replace him. They want him gone because he is the best manager in the world and they are frightened he will build another great team.
 
This is what we are up against every fucking day.



Misinformation, dishonest, immoral liers.

Got to love Pep for being so honest and forthright, also for letting that last question be asked. The main thing I took away wasn’t the question or the answer, it was the framing of it.

‘We know you’ve had some horrendous decisions’ and ‘You could argue that it was a perfectly good goal as the action had started and Guehi fouled Solanke’, or words to that effect. Just think about that for a second.

We know that all these journalists speak to each other and have the same opinions on most matters, and he’s stating that he knows we’ve had some terrible decisions given against us, but how many of them have highlighted this in the media? Then he comes with some abstract rule that now tells you black from white to allow themselves to believe that the goal should have stood. They’re basically twisting themselves inside and out to protect the brand.

Only 30 seconds of footage but this gives a huge understanding how the media are willing to change their opinion to suit a narrative, knowing that the goal should have been disallowed, even admitting that we get ridiculous decisions against us, but not wanting to rock the Sky/PL/PGMOL boat in case they are suddenly flung out and left to swim to shore.
 
And the angle that Jamie Jackson took in the Guardian. Such a cynical twisted view. Pep talked about the horrors of war, and Jackson and the Guardian chose to focus on the UAE and Sudan. That's really not theright angle and it says a lo about JamieJackson and the Guardian that they take that press conference and use it to make a narrow club specific point when the bigger issue is war and its effect on people and how we tolerate this.
 
And whoever it was framed the question as "by the letter of the law it was the right decision" ....was it fuck we all know it was a foul

The "letter of the law" has to be the most stupid expression to have crawled out of the woodwork recently. Used by complete fucking idiots without a mind of their own.
 
And whoever it was framed the question as "by the letter of the law it was the right decision" ....was it fuck we all know it was a foul
Many times we have seen defenders and attackers go for a 50-50 ball in the penalty area and the attacker gets their first and the defender kicks the foot of the forward and a pen. is given.

Spurs got away with one. As Pep says, City must focus on what we can control, but the press are hostile.
 





surprised-sorprendido.gif
 
Wow, I asked chatgpt to write me a short story about how the rise of city to challenge the old cartel (and how the media have been used against us) could be written in a distopian fashion. The outcome was quite good. It seems chatgpt knows! lol


The Ministry of the League

In the beginning, the Reds said football was free and competitive.

They wore history like scripture—United, Liverpool, Arsenal—three banners hanging over the League like watchful eyes. They called themselves tradition. They called themselves stability. And because they had always been there, everyone believed them.

The Premier League's fans: chanting, buying shirts, arguing on radio phone-ins. Every week, the Ministry of Sport—in studios, pundit desks, and headlines—reminded them what football was for. “Competitive balance,” the broadcasters said. “Protecting the game,” echoed the papers.

The Reds nodded solemnly and signed another global sponsorship.

City arrived quietly at first. Blue shirts, new steel, a new (but old) challenger. They rebuilt training grounds where warehouses had been, paid for players no one else had thought worth the risk. They spoke less about history and more about tomorrow. It made the Reds nervous.

When City began to win, the language changed.
“Financial doping,” the screens declared. “Oil money.” “Threat to the pyramid.” Every failure of the League—rising ticket prices, shrinking squads, clubs folding below—was traced back to City’s shadow. The people of all clubs brainwashed to chant it. Cheats. Villains. Crooks.

What the Ministry never showed was the old ledger.

The Reds had written the rules when no one was watching. They had locked broadcast money, global reach, and prestige into place decades earlier, calling it merit while pulling the ladder up behind them. Their hoarded advantages warped competition year after year—but because it was familiar, it was invisible.

Only City tried to speak. They published numbers. Built academies. Pointed at the past.

The screens went dark.

In the League, fans outside the Cartel now argued fiercely against the one club trying to break the spell, never noticing that the game itself was thinning—less hope, fewer challengers, quieter dreams.

And the Reds smiled, because the most powerful trick in football, as in politics, was convincing everyone that damage looked like tradition—and resistance looked like treason.
 
Think you’re mixing her up with Emily Brobyn who is a massive blue and does a great job representing City fans when asked
I have to respectfully disagree with you on that character bud. Any blue that takes coin from the bbc who actively undermine the club and us supporters is not a blue in my opinion. If you have a view that differs her on social media she brands you with the usual throwaway tags so she has full on bbc idiot.

Kippax girl Emily I would wager never stood on the old girl herself.
 
Standing up for the right cause as always. At least when all is said and done, Pep will be on the right side of history.
Not sure there is a right side tbf. Humans will continue to kill humans and justify it by whatever they want to justify it with.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top