Media discussion - 2025/26

Quite enjoying the pile-on for the tax dodging racist Scruffy Jim, who might just have scuppered any chance of public funding for the New Toilet
Deprressingly predictable too that the very same halfwits on X, who whinged about Pep speaking out against actual genocide/ war crimes in Gaza ("should stay in his lane", "what does a millionaire like him know about suffering?") , are today eagerly cheerleading Manchester United's tax-dodging emigrant billionaire owner, as he punches down to distract them from his own cuntish behaviour.
Hate is a powerful drug.
 
My reaction to the " Get Involved " program today on Sky Sports. I bet it never gets a mention.-----------------------------------
Having listened to the discussion today on the get involved program on Sky Sports, I feel compelled to address what seems to be the default narrative whenever Manchester City is mentioned, the constant reference to money. It is spoken about as though success has simply been purchased, as though that alone explains everything. It does not.

What is consistently overlooked is leadership, vision and execution. Since the takeover, Manchester City has been transformed not just through investment, but through intelligent, disciplined and strategic management. Yes, money has been invested — but it has been invested with purpose, with planning, and with long-term vision.

Our owners didn’t arrive chasing headlines. They arrived with a blueprint. They modernised the club from top to bottom, appointed world-class professionals at every level, built infrastructure that will serve generations, and revitalised the surrounding community. The Etihad Campus stands as physical proof that this has never been about short-term gain; it has been about building something sustainable and lasting.

Pep Guardiola’s brilliance is undeniable, but he operates within a structure that was carefully constructed long before the trophies began to arrive. Recruitment, youth development, facilities, business operations, everything has been aligned. That is not accidental. That is elite ownership and elite governance.

As supporters, we are not just proud of the silverware, though the achievements speak for themselves: domestic dominance, historic milestones, and European success. We are proud of how it has been done. With professionalism. With stability. With a clear philosophy.

There seems to be an implication in some quarters that success backed by investment is somehow less legitimate. That argument ignores a simple truth: many clubs spend heavily. Very few are run as well as Manchester City. The difference is competence. The difference is leadership.

I remember the day of the takeover clearly. My eldest son, who had worked in Dubai and Abu Dhabi for many years, said to me, “Dad, they don’t fail at what they do.” That statement has proved prophetic. The standards set by our ownership are the standards we now see reflected across the club.

Manchester City supporters are deeply grateful for that vision. We are immensely proud of what has been built. We are confident that the success achieved is not just the result of investment, but also of excellence in management, planning, and execution at every level.

That is the part of the story that deserves equal airtime.
That is excellent. However it is well written, there are words of more than one syllable so the thickos at Sky won't be able to read, let alone comprehend. The words Red and Win are all they are able to deal with....
 
My reaction to the " Get Involved " program today on Sky Sports. I bet it never gets a mention.-----------------------------------
Having listened to the discussion today on the get involved program on Sky Sports, I feel compelled to address what seems to be the default narrative whenever Manchester City is mentioned, the constant reference to money. It is spoken about as though success has simply been purchased, as though that alone explains everything. It does not.

What is consistently overlooked is leadership, vision and execution. Since the takeover, Manchester City has been transformed not just through investment, but through intelligent, disciplined and strategic management. Yes, money has been invested — but it has been invested with purpose, with planning, and with long-term vision.

Our owners didn’t arrive chasing headlines. They arrived with a blueprint. They modernised the club from top to bottom, appointed world-class professionals at every level, built infrastructure that will serve generations, and revitalised the surrounding community. The Etihad Campus stands as physical proof that this has never been about short-term gain; it has been about building something sustainable and lasting.

Pep Guardiola’s brilliance is undeniable, but he operates within a structure that was carefully constructed long before the trophies began to arrive. Recruitment, youth development, facilities, business operations, everything has been aligned. That is not accidental. That is elite ownership and elite governance.

As supporters, we are not just proud of the silverware, though the achievements speak for themselves: domestic dominance, historic milestones, and European success. We are proud of how it has been done. With professionalism. With stability. With a clear philosophy.

There seems to be an implication in some quarters that success backed by investment is somehow less legitimate. That argument ignores a simple truth: many clubs spend heavily. Very few are run as well as Manchester City. The difference is competence. The difference is leadership.

I remember the day of the takeover clearly. My eldest son, who had worked in Dubai and Abu Dhabi for many years, said to me, “Dad, they don’t fail at what they do.” That statement has proved prophetic. The standards set by our ownership are the standards we now see reflected across the club.

Manchester City supporters are deeply grateful for that vision. We are immensely proud of what has been built. We are confident that the success achieved is not just the result of investment, but also of excellence in management, planning, and execution at every level.

That is the part of the story that deserves equal airtime.
Well you have totally fucked up any chance you had to get involved. That was a good read and a well deserved like.
 
horrible gutless press bastards we need Andy Morrison welcoming them in a narrow corridor with a strong handshake whispering in their ear "you disrespect Manchester City and I will put you into next week "
Catching up with this thread after a couple of weeks out of it. I am available for said role …
 
My reaction to the " Get Involved " program today on Sky Sports. I bet it never gets a mention.-----------------------------------
Having listened to the discussion today on the get involved program on Sky Sports, I feel compelled to address what seems to be the default narrative whenever Manchester City is mentioned, the constant reference to money. It is spoken about as though success has simply been purchased, as though that alone explains everything. It does not.

What is consistently overlooked is leadership, vision and execution. Since the takeover, Manchester City has been transformed not just through investment, but through intelligent, disciplined and strategic management. Yes, money has been invested — but it has been invested with purpose, with planning, and with long-term vision.

Our owners didn’t arrive chasing headlines. They arrived with a blueprint. They modernised the club from top to bottom, appointed world-class professionals at every level, built infrastructure that will serve generations, and revitalised the surrounding community. The Etihad Campus stands as physical proof that this has never been about short-term gain; it has been about building something sustainable and lasting.

Pep Guardiola’s brilliance is undeniable, but he operates within a structure that was carefully constructed long before the trophies began to arrive. Recruitment, youth development, facilities, business operations, everything has been aligned. That is not accidental. That is elite ownership and elite governance.

As supporters, we are not just proud of the silverware, though the achievements speak for themselves: domestic dominance, historic milestones, and European success. We are proud of how it has been done. With professionalism. With stability. With a clear philosophy.

There seems to be an implication in some quarters that success backed by investment is somehow less legitimate. That argument ignores a simple truth: many clubs spend heavily. Very few are run as well as Manchester City. The difference is competence. The difference is leadership.

I remember the day of the takeover clearly. My eldest son, who had worked in Dubai and Abu Dhabi for many years, said to me, “Dad, they don’t fail at what they do.” That statement has proved prophetic. The standards set by our ownership are the standards we now see reflected across the club.

Manchester City supporters are deeply grateful for that vision. We are immensely proud of what has been built. We are confident that the success achieved is not just the result of investment, but also of excellence in management, planning, and execution at every level.

That is the part of the story that deserves equal airtime.
that Fanalysis or whatever it's called is part owned by gary neville thats why sky bought into it and changed their programming and turned into youtube channel
if you expect any praise or good will you'll be waiting long time

to answer other poster you have to download (ker ching ) to get chance to be involved
 
that Fanalysis or whatever it's called is part owned by gary neville thats why sky bought into it and changed their programming and turned into youtube channel
if you expect any praise or good will you'll be waiting long time

to answer other poster you have to download (ker ching ) to get chance to be involved
I appreciate you sharing your view. From what I understand, Gary Neville being involved in The Overlap (or similar projects) doesn’t automatically mean Sky “bought into it” or changed their programming because of that. Media partnerships and programming decisions are usually influenced by a range of commercial and audience factors, not just one individual’s involvement.


It’s fair to question media ownership and influence — that’s part of healthy debate in a democratic society. But I think it’s important we base our conclusions on clear evidence rather than assumptions about motives.


As for praise or goodwill, I’m not really here for that. I shared my post to have an open discussion and hear different perspectives. Disagreement is fine — that’s how conversations stay balanced and constructive.
 
I appreciate you sharing your view. From what I understand, Gary Neville being involved in The Overlap (or similar projects) doesn’t automatically mean Sky “bought into it” or changed their programming because of that. Media partnerships and programming decisions are usually influenced by a range of commercial and audience factors, not just one individual’s involvement.


It’s fair to question media ownership and influence — that’s part of healthy debate in a democratic society. But I think it’s important we base our conclusions on clear evidence rather than assumptions about motives.


As for praise or goodwill, I’m not really here for that. I shared my post to have an open discussion and hear different perspectives. Disagreement is fine — that’s how conversations stay balanced and constructive.
its no assumption but i'll leave you to it
 
its no assumption but i'll leave you to it
If it’s not an assumption, then I’d genuinely be interested in seeing the evidence behind it. That’s all I’m asking for. Strong claims deserve clear backing.
If you’d rather not expand on it, that’s fine too. I’m comfortable leaving it there. I just prefer discussions where we deal in verifiable facts rather than brief dismissals.
 
Deprressingly predictable too that the very same halfwits on X, who whinged about Pep speaking out against actual genocide/ war crimes in Gaza ("should stay in his lane", "what does a millionaire like him know about suffering?") , are today eagerly cheerleading Manchester United's tax-dodging emigrant billionaire owner, as he punches down to distract them from his own cuntish behaviour.
Hate is a powerful drug.
Well my 2p is he expressed himself very poorly and I don’t think he’s the right man to raise the issue, given who he is, however it’s not unreasonable to be critical of UK government immigration policies. He just did so using poor choice of language in a bizarre interview. But this is for another thread.
 
don’t think Raggie Kaveh on sky sports news is too happy with the beige statement United have come out with talking about inclusivity within the club and glossing over what scruffy Jim said.

He’s been pissed off all day laying into scruffy Jim has been Kaveh, maybe he will now burn his Bryan Griggs duvet set in protest.
 
How many other teams are routinely linked to the word
" ominous " ? A quick Google search reveals plenty of examples for us but very few for anyone else .

Ominous describes something that suggests or indicates that something bad, evil, or unpleasant is about to happen, often creating a sense of dread or foreboding. Common synonyms include threatening, menacing, sinister, foreboding, and inauspicious.
Today's lazy offering from a certain paper

 
Had to laugh, Alan clealry didn't watch the second half last night (or any since Xmas)

1770919736251.png
 
How many other teams are routinely linked to the word
" ominous " ? A quick Google search reveals plenty of examples for us but very few for anyone else .

Ominous describes something that suggests or indicates that something bad, evil, or unpleasant is about to happen, often creating a sense of dread or foreboding. Common synonyms include threatening, menacing, sinister, foreboding, and inauspicious.
Today's lazy offering from a certain paper

I like it when we look ominous!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top