Media discussion - 2025/26
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
Longdarnit Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 May 2024
- Messages
- 386
- Team supported
- City
I think we can all agree however that the sports media has been colonised by cnuts.
Blueboy73
Well-Known Member
Winter made one glaring omission, he forgot to mention that the Rags don't need Ratcliffe's help to be an embarrassment.
No game for the Rags this weekend because they weren't good enough to qualify for Europe and were out of both domestic cups by mid January.
No game means no press conference to see whether Roan, Slimy Stone, Shamoon the Rag or any of their other paid shills ask Carrick about Ratcliffe's comments.
We all know they wouldn't have but would have if Pep was in the same position.
Ratcliffe's comments will be chip paper by the time they play next and the media shills will be back to blowing smoke up Carrick's arse.
Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 6,109
To be fair, messrs Duck and Pig probably have at least as good as, if not a better than, insight on the game as any other bbc pundit.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
You can’t justify spending £4bn on the a BBC when most of what it does is duplicated by other broadcasters. We can’t afford it.
BBC to make hundreds of millions of pounds of cuts
The outgoing director general told staff about the savings during an internal call on Thursday.www.bbc.co.uk
I could help them with this - I can think of three people in BBC Sport who represent significant savings and won’t be missed.
leithblue
Well-Known Member
I’m fairly sure it’s not just Arsenal that are in this position, Guardian editors…
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2011
- Messages
- 6,271
Plus, why would any government be interested in providing entertainment for the general public other than to have the ability to infuse the programs with propaganda?
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 20,541
- Team supported
- Manchester City
And BBC Sports wastes so much public funding in their shameless arselicking of the rags and dippers, when so many of their "supporters" don't contribute anyway.
Platt Lane 59
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 3,317
Yes, all 3 are egotistical exes who are yesterday's news.
WInter's career path is spiralling downwards so fast, he will soon be popping up in the Metro free paper - available at Rail & Metro/Tube/Tram stations...
He'll be writing for the Echo soon "If goals by VVD counted triple Liverpool would be top of the league and here's why......"
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
Listening to yourself after 15 years is a salutary experience but just come across my early encounter with the BBC cockroaches from May 2010 which shows they set their stall out against us from the off.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
dropping points is what City do lol
asahartford1
Well-Known Member
He is busy attending the Swamp where he has several Season Tickets.
Bert Swift
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Sep 2023
- Messages
- 80
- Location
- Sat on a Kippax barrier
- Team supported
- The 21st Century Treble Winners
Club distance themselves from co-owner
The Times reported on 13/12/26 that the hierarchy of the club had distanced themselves from their co-owner, Jim Ratcliffe, and those involved in utd`s new stadium ideas were also concerned about the effects of his words.
It is the case though that the regeneration proposals in Trafford do not require a new stadium. The proposals can be developed independently of utd speculatively riding on the coattails of others.
The absent billionaire owners in America and Monaco are not putting in any of their own money nor are the club. They do not own the required land and do not have the resources themselves. Utd. want others to pay including from the public purse for land acquisition and relocation of a freight rail terminal.
Utd. executives started last year, pitching at MIPIM and trying to get others interested in paying, but utd. did mot have a plan, the necessary land or a budget. Just sketches and impressions quickly put together with the publicity hungry Mayor jumping on a potential good news story for political gain.
The new Mayoral Corporation, fronted by southerner Coe who is no friend of Manchester after his negative approach to the Commonwealth Games and previous Manchester bids for the Olympics, has no connection or affinity with the North.
Stockport`s Mayoral Corporation is a success with less hyperbole, wise investment and value for money.
There is much smoke and many mirrors out of town across in Trafford.
The Times reported on 13/12/26 that the hierarchy of the club had distanced themselves from their co-owner, Jim Ratcliffe, and those involved in utd`s new stadium ideas were also concerned about the effects of his words.
It is the case though that the regeneration proposals in Trafford do not require a new stadium. The proposals can be developed independently of utd speculatively riding on the coattails of others.
The absent billionaire owners in America and Monaco are not putting in any of their own money nor are the club. They do not own the required land and do not have the resources themselves. Utd. want others to pay including from the public purse for land acquisition and relocation of a freight rail terminal.
Utd. executives started last year, pitching at MIPIM and trying to get others interested in paying, but utd. did mot have a plan, the necessary land or a budget. Just sketches and impressions quickly put together with the publicity hungry Mayor jumping on a potential good news story for political gain.
The new Mayoral Corporation, fronted by southerner Coe who is no friend of Manchester after his negative approach to the Commonwealth Games and previous Manchester bids for the Olympics, has no connection or affinity with the North.
Stockport`s Mayoral Corporation is a success with less hyperbole, wise investment and value for money.
There is much smoke and many mirrors out of town across in Trafford.